User Controls
I disagree with the entire premise of this western backed article
-
2023-06-27 at 12:18 PM UTCanyone with me on this?
https://www.theguardian.com/society/2000/may/24/childrensservices.guardiansocietysupplement
"The eagerly anticipated guidelines on child prostitution issued by the government last Monday don't change the law, but they do make it clear, for the first time, that children involved in prostitution are victims of abuse and not criminals. Most significantly, the guidelines recognise that "children do not voluntarily enter prostitution: they are coerced, enticed or are utterly desperate".
Safeguarding Children Involved in Prostitution makes it clear that children - under the age of 18 - caught up in prostitution should be given the same help, support and protection as any other child in need. There can now be no doubt that child prostitution is a child protection issue.
It may seem bizarre that there should ever have been any debate about whether children involved in prostitution are being abused. Yet deliberations about child prostitution have a long history."
wrong on every account. even from middle or upper class families many girls under 18 do prostitution or even would join porn due to greed. theyw ant the shiniest bags the best shoes etc. stuff not related to eating or surviving but living beyond their means. this is what that polish movie and phenomenon called galerianki showed. these girls just want materialsitic shit and do what their friends do or follow the herd nothing to do with starving and doing prostitution out of desperation. -
2023-06-27 at 12:18 PM UTCalso one can make an argument some enjoy the attention from adults or adult men they never had at home. another argument one could make some a small eprcentage like the sex.
-
2023-06-27 at 12:20 PM UTC
Originally posted by Wariat anyone with me on this?
https://www.theguardian.com/society/2000/may/24/childrensservices.guardiansocietysupplement
"The eagerly anticipated guidelines on child prostitution issued by the government last Monday don't change the law, but they do make it clear, for the first time, that children involved in prostitution are victims of abuse and not criminals. Most significantly, the guidelines recognise that "children do not voluntarily enter prostitution: they are coerced, enticed or are utterly desperate".
Safeguarding Children Involved in Prostitution makes it clear that children - under the age of 18 - caught up in prostitution should be given the same help, support and protection as any other child in need. There can now be no doubt that child prostitution is a child protection issue.
It may seem bizarre that there should ever have been any debate about whether children involved in prostitution are being abused. Yet deliberations about child prostitution have a long history."
wrong on every account. even from middle or upper class families many girls under 18 do prostitution or even would join porn due to greed. theyw ant the shiniest bags the best shoes etc. stuff not related to eating or surviving but living beyond their means. this is what that polish movie and phenomenon called galerianki showed. these girls just want materialsitic shit and do what their friends do or follow the herd nothing to do with starving and doing prostitution out of desperation.
Originally posted by Wariat also one can make an argument some enjoy the attention from adults or adult men they never had at home. another argument one could make some a small eprcentage like the sex.
do you ever do anything but abuse stims and alcohol, bother teenagers and search different variations of 'child sex' on social media? -
2023-06-27 at 12:50 PM UTCthe premise is totally at fault aldra. for instance look at the phenomenon of onlyspace and even girls lying about their age tojoin and make an extra buck. all the evidence points most prostitutes do it by choice not necessity. compare western countries with so many more porn actresses or willing to do porn vs poland for instance a poorer country. the list foe son aldra.
-
2023-06-27 at 12:57 PM UTCwariat does have a point.
remember how children will mow the lawn or do newspaper delivery for some pocket money ?
well, thats child labor and child exploitation.
but theyre legal because the society approves of it despite the damages these child exploitations can do to these kids.
i dont see how mowing the grass is different from putting mens genitals into your mouth and swallows whatever that come out at the end of that process.
in fact its easier work for more pay, -
2023-06-27 at 12:59 PM UTCwhat i meant is that if you look at the hsitorical record prostitution as a concept alays had them participating no?
-
2023-06-27 at 1 PM UTCoh crimeney
-
2023-06-27 at 1:02 PM UTC
-
2023-06-27 at 1:03 PM UTCbut they enjoyed it in some cases no? i mean i just linked an article to the girl who inspired not whinnie the poo but peter pan.
-
2023-06-27 at 1:04 PM UTCdid you read it vinnie? she flat out admitted not the sex but all aspects of prostitution at age 10 or 11 she liked. brakldye evenc alled her a slut. did you read it vinny?
-
2023-06-27 at 1:04 PM UTCthey had to burn the book because it was so controversial all copies of it but one.
-
2023-06-27 at 1:06 PM UTChere it is for vinny and aldra:
https://niggasin.space/thread/81788?p=1 -
2023-06-27 at 1:06 PM UTCread the entire thread guys its very insightful.
-
2023-06-27 at 1:06 PM UTCit has lots of deep info on the usbject this western white washed article above does not address guys. what say u?
-
2023-06-27 at 1:09 PM UTC"In 1848, it was claimed that almost 2,700 girls in London between the ages of 11 and 16 were hospitalised because of venereal disease, many as a result of prosti tution. In 1875, the age of consent, which had remained at 12 since 1285, was raised to 13, partly as a result of concerns about child prostitution."
damm it should have stayed at 12 dont you guys think?
