User Controls
The dargo "apology"
-
2017-05-24 at 3:35 AM UTC
Originally posted by Malice Honestly, as I've mentioned before, berating Bill Krozby, which he wholly deserves, is therapeutic and helps alleviate my depression. It really should be a national pastime.
Do you think that's the case with others as well? Do you think Bill Krozby perhaps gains the identical therapy and depression alleviation from doing the same thing? Interesting if that's the actual case. All this is simply therapeutic.. it really must be otherwise we'd discontinue it. Essentially, everyone is winning as long as are they're involved in the exchanges. So it's all very self beneficial in that regard, but in the long run it's probably not a very strong deterrent of diagnosed depression and has little effect on the overall remedying of such. -
2017-05-24 at 3:36 AM UTC
-
2017-05-24 at 3:40 AM UTC
Originally posted by mmQ If he were truly, mentally retarded, unable to understand what he's doing, we would have to conclude at this point that 'making fun of him' or harrassing him would actually benefit him as he clearly enjoys replying and being egged on.
People make fun of people that argue with actual retards because it's essentially like fighting with a toddler. Why do people fight with toddlers?
I'm high on resin and keep thinking about this, who benefits more in one of these scenarios? The oblivious retard, or the people calling him names? I think it's a good question. My scenario is probably similar with Jill; I had to finally acknowledge that my replies were only encouraging her, truly probably making her happy, and that being not my intention Ive like finally learned (right now) that I'm probably done, for the most part anyway.
Arguing for days, weeks, years on end with someone you consider literally mentally retarded, Malice. Do you think you know why you do that? Why anyone does it?
It is supposed to benefit the person getting berated. How you might ask? Well, in our little retarded social group we have some unspoken social rules and norms and shit, yes really. The rules generally provide a net benefit to the group. A simple example would be: "I won't shit up your thread for no good reason if you don't do it to me". Bill Krozby generally doesn't do very well identifying and/or following the social rules and group dynamic. The shit we fling at him is supposed to signal to him: "Cool it dude, this is not the way you behave in our little group". Or, if you want to look at it this way: "You do not belong in our social group". The choice is quite simple here really, you either conform to the social norms or you fuck off. Or if you're Bill Krozby you pick option three: Get assblasted ad infinitum. -
2017-05-24 at 3:46 AM UTCThat makes a lot of sense Sophie and is understandable, but still in lies my question, since we are all mostly to the point of option 3, who is now benefiting and why? Both parties mutually, neither, or the collective of parties involved?
-
2017-05-24 at 3:47 AM UTCLel this fred shur backfird on hot-dougler, fucking bitch ass weenie dreaming pizza slut fag bitch ass child abanding faget, kill ureslf cuckboi
-
2017-05-24 at 3:48 AM UTCNobody benefits. It ain't hard math.
-
2017-05-24 at 3:49 AM UTC
-
2017-05-24 at 4 AM UTC
Originally posted by mmQ That makes a lot of sense Sophie and is understandable, but still in lies my question, since we are all mostly to the point of option 3, who is now benefiting and why? Both parties mutually, neither, or the collective of parties involved?
When you think about it, the group always benefits. Here are the scenarios. 1. Bill Krozby behaves, the group gains a positive member. 2. Bill Krozby leaves, the group loses a negative member. 3. Bill Krozby doesn't leave but the idea of our social norms are constantly being reinforced by and upon the members of our group, strengthening them.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2017-05-24 at 4:07 AM UTC
Originally posted by Captain Falcon Lel this fred shur backfird on hot-dougler, fucking bitch ass weenie dreaming pizza slut fag bitch ass child abanding faget, kill ureslf cuckboi
Hardly.
Time and time again Bill Krozby and I continue to jostle the zimmies of every rat we encounter. Zend us malicious messages, dox us, phone our family, co workers, friends and every police force on the globe you fucking rattox scum.
Sometimes I feel like this is a losing war but then I look and see 7 billion rats building their nest and solving the puzzle of destroying it gets easier every day. Your numbers mean nothing.
-
2017-05-24 at 4:08 AM UTC
Originally posted by Sophie When you think about it, the group always benefits. Here are the scenarios. 1. Bill Krozby behaves, the group gains a positive member. 2. Bill Krozby leaves, the group loses a negative member. 3. Bill Krozby doesn't leave but the idea of our social norms are constantly being reinforced by and upon the members of our group, strengthening them.
What if there is no group? Or each instance is taken as a 1v1 for a lack of a cringier term? Is each individual simply reinforcing and strengthening their idea of social norms? Is it akin to sharpening one's own blade, perfecting what they believe to their own master craft, honing their skills and strengthening their armor? Lol -
2017-05-24 at 4:15 AM UTCHate against a common enemy can be a strong uniter.
-
2017-05-24 at 4:19 AM UTC
-
2017-05-24 at 4:22 AM UTC
-
2017-05-24 at 4:23 AM UTC
Originally posted by mmQ What if there is no group? Or each instance is taken as a 1v1 for a lack of a cringier term? Is each individual simply reinforcing and strengthening their idea of social norms? Is it akin to sharpening one's own blade, perfecting what they believe to their own master craft, honing their skills and strengthening their armor? Lol
There's always a group though, and everyone has individual relations within that group. Something might start as a squabble between two individuals but there sometimes comes a point wherein some people take a side. Everyone has their own sense of the social norms but they generally align well within the group, at least when there is a dominant culture as it were. -
2017-05-24 at 4:24 AM UTC
Originally posted by Captain Falcon Do you saport Bill Krozby
Bill Krozby is a hardcore trianglist and he does not observe zaint zattocks or anything of any kind, he is very much lost also. He is in a reality nobody here can handle, my proof?. A LARGE percent of totse/zoklet was made up of people from states with high population density and large capital cities in certain parts of the USA. California and Texas were a large part of this active user base that made up the totse community and spin offs over the years.
All of those people that made up your old communities, all those people are long gone and never coming back.
Bill Krozby is one of the brave, one of the few. I know what its like also to be an outcast even on the internet and around degenerates.
Lone woof trianglists man, watch out. We spend a lot of our energy trying not to be violent and being chill instead.
Bill Krozby cop is a real life superhero making his community better every day, something you rats would know nothing about.
Bill Krozby is a real life space cowboy, rootin tootin wildest gont in the west. He's billy the kid. he's Bill Krozby the Gont.
Originally posted by Malice Hate against a common enemy can be a strong uniter.
Sacrifice of the pure innocents to geometric shapes is even more powerful.
-
2017-05-24 at 4:26 AM UTCAlso some people like Spectral and Scron just like to identify as underdog for some reason. I think they culturally self-cucked.
-
2017-05-24 at 4:30 AM UTC
-
2017-05-24 at 5:27 AM UTC
-
2017-05-24 at 10:40 AM UTC
Originally posted by Sophie When you think about it, the group always benefits. Here are the scenarios. 1. Bill Krozby behaves, the group gains a positive member. 2. Bill Krozby leaves, the group loses a negative member. 3. Bill Krozby doesn't leave but the idea of our social norms are constantly being reinforced by and upon the members of our group, strengthening them.
Seriously dude, fuck this group.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2017-05-24 at 10:55 AM UTC
