User Controls

World to hit temperature tipping point 10 years faster than forecast

  1. Originally posted by Obbe

    Right -Spectral?

    And yet the same billionaires have you to push their climate change hoax, to distract from what they're doing to the planet and the populations. How very civic-minded of you.
  2. Obbe Alan What? [annoy my right-angled speediness]
    Originally posted by ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ And yet the same billionaires have you to push their climate change hoax, to distract from what they're doing to the planet and the populations. How very civic-minded of you.

    Keep lying to yourself - I will continue to post the news and laugh at your willful ignorance.
  3. Originally posted by Obbe Actually, mRNA vaccines can help prevent you from getting sick,

    thats what prophylaxises do, not vaccines.

    if something can not vaccinates yiu against something, then it isnt a vaccine.
  4. Obbe Alan What? [annoy my right-angled speediness]
    Originally posted by vindicktive vinny thats what prophylaxises do, not vaccines.

    if something can not vaccinates yiu against something, then it isnt a vaccine.

    No vaccine is 100% effective.
  5. Obbe Alan What? [annoy my right-angled speediness]
    Fruits and vegetables are less nutritious than they used to be | Mounting evidence shows that many of today’s whole foods aren't as packed with vitamins and nutrients as they were 70 years ago, potentially putting people's health at risk.

    Scientists say that the root of the problem lies in modern agricultural processes that increase crop yields but disturb soil health. These include irrigation, fertilisation, and harvesting methods that also disrupt essential interactions between plants and soil fungi, which reduces absorption of nutrients from the soil. These issues are occurring against the backdrop of climate change and rising levels of carbon dioxide, which are also lowering the nutrient contents of fruits, vegetables, and grains.
  6. Originally posted by Obbe No vaccine is 100% effective.

    ok, so how effective is pfizer and modernas covid "vaccine" are.

    respectively.

    in percentage.

    i'll wait.
  7. Originally posted by vindicktive vinny ok, so how effective is pfizer and modernas covid "vaccine" are.

    respectively.

    in percentage.

    i'll wait.

    He'll check with his gods over at CNN and get right back to you.
  8. Obbe Alan What? [annoy my right-angled speediness]
    Originally posted by vindicktive vinny ok, so how effective is pfizer and modernas covid "vaccine" are.

    respectively.

    in percentage.

    i'll wait.

    For the scary science thing vaccines (Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna), clinical trials have shown high efficacy rates. In those trials, the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine demonstrated an efficacy of around 95%, while the Moderna vaccine showed an efficacy of approximately 94%. These efficacy rates indicated a significant reduction in the risk of symptomatic COVID-19 among vaccinated individuals compared to those who received a placebo.
  9. Originally posted by ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ He'll check with his priests and priesteses over at CNN and get right back to you.

    corrected
  10. Originally posted by Obbe For the scary science thing vaccines (Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna), clinical trials have shown high efficacy rates. In those trials, the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine demonstrated an efficacy of around 95%, while the Moderna vaccine showed an efficacy of approximately 94%. These efficacy rates indicated a significant reduction in the risk of symptomatic COVID-19 among vaccinated individuals compared to those who received a placebo.

    numbers from clinical trials were used due to the lack of actual, real life, empirical data in the early days of mass vaccination roll out.

    we have been 3 years into mandatory/mass/multiple-shots vaccination ers already with billions of people vaccinated.

    now lets see data from the real world instead of limited, NDAs restricted, selective clinical trial datas.

    lets see them.
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  11. Obbe Alan What? [annoy my right-angled speediness]
    Originally posted by vindicktive vinny numbers from clinical trials were used due to the lack of actual, real life, empirical data.

    we have been 3 years into mandatory/mass/multiple-shots vaccination ers already with billions of people vaccinated.

    now lets see data from the real world instead of limited, NDAs restricted, selective clinical trial datas.

    lets see them.

    Go find them.
  12. Originally posted by Obbe Go find them.

    i found them already.

    i just want to see you deny their lack of efficacy.
  13. Obbe Alan What? [annoy my right-angled speediness]
    Originally posted by vindicktive vinny i found them already.

    i just want to see you deny their lack of efficacy.

    If they lack efficacy, then that is just another sign of our collapsing civilization.
  14. Originally posted by Obbe For the scary science thing vaccines (Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna), clinical trials have shown high efficacy rates. In those trials, the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine demonstrated an efficacy of around 95%, while the Moderna vaccine showed an efficacy of approximately 94%. These efficacy rates indicated a significant reduction in the risk of symptomatic COVID-19 among vaccinated individuals compared to those who received a placebo.

    More outright lies. You should be ashamed of yourself.
  15. Obbe Alan What? [annoy my right-angled speediness]
    Originally posted by ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ More outright lies. You should be ashamed of yourself.

    Show how that was a lie. Go ahead.

    You never will, because you cannot. Because you are stupid.
  16. Originally posted by Obbe If they lack efficacy, then that is just another sign of our collapsing civilization.

    no, its just a sigh that your stupid.

    https://www.cnn.com/2022/06/30/health/covid-paxlovid-fauci-rebound/index.html

    covid him once, shame on him.

    covid him twice, shame on you.

  17. Obbe Alan What? [annoy my right-angled speediness]
    Originally posted by vindicktive vinny no, its just a sigh that your stupid.

    https://www.cnn.com/2022/06/30/health/covid-paxlovid-fauci-rebound/index.html

    covid him once, shame on him.

    covid him twice, shame on you.


    In any case, it definitely is a sign of further societal collapse.
  18. Originally posted by Obbe Show how that was a lie. Go ahead.

    You never will, because you cannot. Because you are stupid.

    Pfizer already went on the record and openly admitted the gene therapy was never designed to, and does not, prevent transmission of SARS-COV-2. Maybe if you did the actual research, instead of parroting mainstream lies, you'd be aware of that fact.
  19. Obbe Alan What? [annoy my right-angled speediness]
    Originally posted by ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ Pfizer already went on the record and openly admitted the gene therapy was never designed to, and does not, prevent transmission of SARS-COV-2. Maybe if you did the actual research, instead of parroting mainstream lies, you'd be aware of that fact.

    Pfizer has never made such a statement regarding their COVID-19 vaccine. The Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine, along with other authorized vaccines, has been shown to be highly effective in preventing symptomatic COVID-19 infection and reducing the severity of the disease.
Jump to Top