Originally posted by WellHung
Guns are not required for a mass casualty attack, but they certainly facilitate it/make it easier. Does that concept resonate with you? As far as knife statistics in the UK ..sure they increased substantially… but still the total volume of people murdered is substantially less than gun related violence. Isn't the end game about saving lives?
It doesn't matter what the numbers or %'s are. You can kill people plenty of ways without knifes, guns, sticks. As long as they are willing to do it, they will find a way
Explosives, Chemical and Biological Weapons, Radiological Weapons, Sound Weapons, Fire, Water, co2, space lasers, poison in the food/water, destroying all sources of food, extreme heat and cold, extreme pressure.
This is the ideology of clandestine drug chemistry, You truly cannot ban or restrict anything.
Hunter stated that he conceived TOTSE as "a place where all types of ideas could be spoken, traded, and exchanged, where no topic was off-limits or forbidden" in the early days of the Internet; and, as demonstrated in the scope of TOTSE text file archive, he felt this was only a part of the community by 2009.
Do you also think certain words should be banned, because they can cause harm and promote and incite hate and violence? What about a computer file for schematics to print a ghost gun, are you against sharing that kind of data if it was illegal to do so?
Originally posted by WellHung
You just like to argue with me and play Devil's Advocate.
I can do that too, what about Child Sex Abuse Materiale? which IS illegal to possess, distribute, copy, share and almost nobody has a problem with this. It's a tree of the poison apple type scenario
You can't say child porn should be legalized, that carries too many implications, first being that these laws actually do anything. Because most people would rather see convicted nonces get murdered than have to be on a sex offender registry their entire life and lay low at a halfway house for nonces
The fact that those exist is disgusting and they should be forced out of their communities and not granted protections from harm. But you aren't allowed to do that or even vote on it, even if you could, you will never get enough support. There is no victory or change, just a worse society overall.
We let the market and innovation solve so many problems but these sacred cow laws are basically a gospel dogma at this point, or at least more relevant to an average persons life than any church.
It's ALL corrupt, there are no good sides. If a community wants to ban guns, they should be able to like New York and California. Which just shows that society can and does solve it's own problems
Top down kneejerk reaction laws don't solve problems, they just make you feel better because TV brainwash.
Originally posted by Ecto the plasm
It doesn't matter what the numbers or %'s are. You can kill people plenty of ways without knifes, guns, sticks. As long as they are willing to do it, they will find a way
Explosives, Chemical and Biological Weapons, Radiological Weapons, Sound Weapons, Fire, Water, co2, space lasers, poison in the food/water, destroying all sources of food, extreme heat and cold, extreme pressure.
This is the ideology of clandestine drug chemistry, You truly cannot ban or restrict anything.
Do you also think certain words should be banned, because they can cause harm and promote and incite hate and violence? What about a computer file for schematics to print a ghost gun, are you against sharing that kind of data if it was illegal to do so?
I can do that too, what about Child Sex Abuse Materiale? which IS illegal to possess, distribute, copy, share and almost nobody has a problem with this. It's a tree of the poison apple type scenario
You can't say child porn should be legalized, that carries too many implications, first being that these laws actually do anything. Because most people would rather see convicted nonces get murdered than have to be on a sex offender registry their entire life and lay low at a halfway house for nonces
The fact that those exist is disgusting and they should be forced out of their communities and not granted protections from harm. But you aren't allowed to do that or even vote on it, even if you could, you will never get enough support. There is no victory or change, just a worse society overall.
We let the market and innovation solve so many problems but these sacred cow laws are basically a gospel dogma at this point, or at least more relevant to an average persons life than any church.
It's ALL corrupt, there are no good sides. If a community wants to ban guns, they should be able to like New York and California. Which just shows that society can and does solve it's own problems
Top down kneejerk reaction laws don't solve problems, they just make you feel better because TV brainwash.
Why does Canada have such a small problem with societal violence?
