User Controls
Opinions on the homeless?
-
2017-05-17 at 8:09 PM UTCVery strange.
He had something about him that attracts people to this day.
He chose a path that lead to his death.. or did he really die on that day Russians invasion into his bunker. or did they take him away? -
2017-05-17 at 8:13 PM UTCHTS is Strickler Propanga
-
2017-05-17 at 8:16 PM UTC
-
2017-05-17 at 8:16 PM UTC
Originally posted by Totse 2001 Very strange.
He had something about him that attracts people to this day.
He chose a path that lead to his death.. or did he really die on that day Russians invasion into his bunker. or did they take him away?
I am pretty sure Der Fuhrer is dead. Sadly. But he will live on forever in our hearts.
-
2017-05-17 at 8:17 PM UTCStifler and Topanga
-
2017-05-17 at 8:19 PM UTCIts gotta be somebody...right?
-
2017-05-17 at 9:07 PM UTC
-
2017-05-17 at 11:46 PM UTCLazy, stupid pieces of shit. Why would they not invoke squatter's rights?
-
2017-05-18 at 2:11 AM UTC
Originally posted by Helladamnleet Lazy, stupid pieces of shit. Why would they not invoke squatter's rights?
Some of them think that "Squatter's Rights" means it gives them the right to squat and take a shit all over the floors of the abandon buildings instead of one designated bucket outside or in the garage. -
2017-05-18 at 3:22 AM UTC
Originally posted by Totse 2001 Some of them think that "Squatter's Rights" means it gives them the right to squat and take a shit all over the floors of the abandon buildings instead of one designated bucket outside or in the garage.
Exactly. They're too dumb to realize they could go live in an abandoned house FOR FREE and have utilities turned on with the change they collect.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2017-05-18 at 3:30 AM UTC
Originally posted by Totse 2001 This is just bored indian kids doing satire or set up by some adult.
India would never praise an occupier especially since Hitler tried to get Britian to come aboard. England refused. England occupied countries in nearly every timezone and Hitler wanted the same.
So why would Indians love Hitler? This is just some weird Indian Satire
India was struggling for independence in the lead up to and during WWII, to a significant degree it was the events in Europe at the time that allowed what was effectively a peasant rebellion to succeed. No amount of civic organization was going to outclass British military and India was too rich a prize to just give up had not it represented a fight on two fronts. There were even factions within Congress who were in talks with with nazi Germany. -
2017-05-18 at 3:33 AM UTC
Originally posted by Lanny India was struggling for independence in the lead up to and during WWII, to a significant degree it was the events in Europe at the time that allowed what was effectively a peasant rebellion to succeed. No amount of civic organization was going to outclass British military and India was too rich a prize to just give up had not it represented a fight on two fronts. There were even factions within Congress who were in talks with with nazi Germany.
today, in India specifically Hitler tends to be seen as a symbol of discipline and hard work; sales of Mein Kampf are high among the white collar/middle class for that reason -
2017-05-19 at 1:41 PM UTC
Originally posted by Lanny India was struggling for independence in the lead up to and during WWII, to a significant degree it was the events in Europe at the time that allowed what was effectively a peasant rebellion to succeed. No amount of civic organization was going to outclass British military and India was too rich a prize to just give up had not it represented a fight on two fronts. There were even factions within Congress who were in talks with with nazi Germany.
Ahh so this is why India has respect for Hitler? -
2017-05-19 at 1:45 PM UTCI want to be a nomadic spaceman
-
2017-05-19 at 1:47 PM UTCI seem to get into trouble when in my youth I would speak about *Why we had to nuke a civilian population* instead of the crippled navy coming back for repair.
They said in saved lives in the longrun, but clearly it was to punish the shit out of Japanese by killing their families. I thought one of the rules of War was not to kill civilians. Of course the Rape of Nanking was known, and could of been used as an argument. But the jedi thing wasn't really known until the end of the war. So it wasn't until recently that I understood what happen to Dresden and Hamburg. US and British came in, bombed the shit out of the two cities, and everyone ran to shelter in their basements (many died). but then they returned a few hours later to get everyone to run to shelter, but instead they dropped incendiary devices which was like fuel being spilled into basement and gutters and bomb shelters then ignite on fire. melting everyone. They said possibly 600,000 German civilians died that way. thats more than 3 times what happened between two nukes on Japan.
I have respect for the VA and that they won the war, but clearly at the top was some sadistic thinking. -
2017-05-19 at 2:05 PM UTC
Originally posted by Lanny What's your point? Yes, war often causes homelessness, yes homelessness exists in countries that don't practice western style capitalism. Neither of theses things seems like a meaningful issue to the assertion that homelessness, especially the homelessness we see in the US, is the product of a capitalistic system with decreasing labor demands relative to the population.
War causes homelessness at a much higher rate than capitalism. So your statement is misleading. The topic was homelessness, not homelessness in the US. And even then it's dubious. Alcoholism and drug addiction cause homelessness. Abject poverty causes homelessness, and capitalism is not the only way poverty comes into existence. A shit load of factors cause homelessness. Pinning it on "capitalism" is as meaningless as saying "being born causes homelessness." -
2017-05-19 at 3:59 PM UTC>muh homes
a home is just a fucking box. get a fucking tent. i'm sick of hearing people cry about this self inflicted imaginary condition called 'homelessness' -
2017-05-19 at 4 PM UTC
-
2017-05-19 at 4:04 PM UTC
Originally posted by snab_snib >muh homes
a home is just a fucking box. get a fucking tent. i'm sick of hearing people cry about this self inflicted imaginary condition called 'homelessness'
*do not get a fucking tent. any tent that isn't exorbitantly expensive is a retarded piece of shit heap of cheap plastic and retarded fucking joints between lash poles and it won't last five minutes and it's utterly impossible to efficiently re-pack and store. rather, just get tarps, paracord, carabiners, spikes, and fashion a shelter from such. it can be logically repacked into a tight bundle with nylon straps, it's cheaper, more durable, etc etc etc. anyone that 'buys a tent' unless it's one of those $1600+ extreme weather rated mountaineering marvels of technology made from bonded goretex composite nanocarbon Silnylon it's just a piece of shit for soccer moms and stupid-dad-TV-trope faggots to get from wal*mart before going on their retarded fucking vacation to some gay ass park so they can sleep by some tree's a 10 minute walk away from vending machines for WHAT purpose i will never fucking know. -
2017-05-19 at 4:09 PM UTC
Originally posted by greenplastic So your statement is misleading.
I'm sorry you were misled, but I don't exactly see where I said or implied capitalism is the, per capita, largest cause of homelessness and diaspora in the world.The topic was homelessness, not homelessness in the US.
So do you think OP, the security guard shooing the homeless away, is dealing with civilians displaced by war or...?
