User Controls
In Poland you can be sued or taken to court just for writing bad google or yelp reviews
-
2023-02-27 at 12:22 AM UTChttps://www.rp.pl/prawo-karne/art38022131-oskarzona-za-niepochlebna-opinie-dla-restauracji-na-google-maps
meanwhile in usa so called journalsits are allowed to misrepsresent facts without double checking them or smear peoples names to the ground. -
2023-02-27 at 12:34 AM UTCmore proof you csnnot slander people in poland guys no matter how hard you do here or whatever countries from your from:
https://forumprawne.org/prawo-karne/871845-znislawienie-sprzedawcy-prosba-o-pomoc.html -
2023-02-27 at 12:35 AM UTCWARNING! BE AWARE! If you're a cannabis enthusiast, you might want to think twice before considering Poland as your next destination. This country has a relatively conservative stance on drug use, with cannabis being illegal and possession, sale, or use of the drug can lead to imprisonment and hefty fines. You wouldn't want to end up in a Polish prison, would you?
But wait, there's more! Foreign investment is also highly discouraged in Poland, with the government doing everything it can to keep foreign businesses out. The economy is weak and the workforce is unskilled, so you probably wouldn't want to invest here anyway., but let's not forget that Poland is still a conservative country with a lot of bureaucratic red tape. You may find yourself dealing with a bunch of regulations and restrictions that can hinder your business operations.
Oh, and did we mention the general lack of public support for the legalization of cannabis? Yeah, that's a thing. So if you're someone who likes to partake in a little herb from time to time, you might want to scratch Poland off your list.
Poland might not be the most welcoming place for those who enjoy cannabis or freedom. So think long and hard before packing your bags and moving there.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2023-02-27 at 12:38 AM UTC
Originally posted by Wariat more proof you csnnot slander people in poland guys no matter how hard you do here or whatever countries from your from:
https://forumprawne.org/prawo-karne/871845-znislawienie-sprzedawcy-prosba-o-pomoc.html
Oh really are you a public business with a yelp page or google? Gonna try to sue a website for calling you a pedophile rapist nigger loving faggit? When you are the one that spams said website with your personal info constantly and claimed to make it all up to "troll us" so basically you want to involve the courts in a non crime because you are upset you doxxed yourself
A POLISH COURT LMAO
go right ahead and tell them you aren't Maciej Warsaaw and that we made all that up to slander you and see how that turns out fucking lmao retard nonce loserThe following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2023-02-27 at 12:41 AM UTC
-
2023-02-27 at 12:45 AM UTC
Originally posted by Twinkie the kid Oh really are you a public business with a yelp page or google? Gonna try to sue a website for calling you a pedophile rapist nigger loving faggit? When you are the one that spams said website with your personal info constantly and claimed to make it all up to "troll us" so basically you want to involve the courts in a non crime because you are upset you doxxed yourself
A POLISH COURT LMAO
go right ahead and tell them you aren't Maciej Warsaaw and that we made all that up to slander you and see how that turns out fucking lmao retard nonce loser
it is even worse when you slander someone who is a privste citizen thsn a business. even cslling someone a hooker or prostitute they could tske you to court if they wanted to if you happen to also be in poland. -
2023-02-27 at 12:52 AM UTCNo one gives a fuck about Poland mouth breather
-
2023-02-27 at 12:52 AM UTC
-
2023-02-27 at 12:53 AM UTCalso to add i am not a perophile never hsvr bern. liking or being into girls sbove the polish sge of consent but below 18 isnt pedophilia nor would domeone be even if thry atctuslly fucked whstever you clsim who also fucked adult mpwomen. the drifnition oertisns to people with an exclusive sttrsction toward prepubescentd snd how many times do i have to explain this to you?
-
2023-02-27 at 3:07 AM UTCif you were in my hood talking that way you would get caled that and beat up, just saying.
I am nothing but a product of my environment -
2023-02-27 at 3:10 AM UTC
Originally posted by Wariat liking or being into girls sbove the polish sge of consent but below 18 isnt pedophilia
If you have to explain your sexual attractions through legal terms and specific terms like "Polish law" than yes, you probably have kinda of sexual mental disorder like pedophilism
I'm a man that likes women. Mature women. Of age females. UGHHM ACTUALLY I AM SEXDUALLY ATTRACTED TO NORTH AMERICANS THAT MEET THE LEGAL DRINKING AGE.... like no thats not a thing lol.
Nobody cares about your snowflake identity terms I'M A HEBEPHILE ACTUALLY!!!! cringeThe following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2023-02-27 at 11:55 AM UTCGuys remember when I had lunch with interpol about wariat? I haven't talked to them in a while maybe I should give them a call again I still have their number. They have to have that giant binder I made with every post wariat ever made up to that point
-
2023-02-27 at 2:25 PM UTCYou can be sued pretty much anywhere in the world for writing bad reviews..doesn't mean the one bringing the lawsuit will win dumbo.
-
2023-02-27 at 2:56 PM UTC
-
2023-02-27 at 2:59 PM UTC
-
2023-02-27 at 3:27 PM UTC
-
2023-02-27 at 4:10 PM UTC
-
2023-02-27 at 4:15 PM UTC
Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson It's nothing to do with science dummy.
science denial in 3 simple steps.
is phillosophy science of thoughts ?Socrates: Hello Katrina, it’s good to see you. I understand that you are a feminist who supports the idea of an age of consent. May I ask why you believe this to be necessary?
Katrina: Yes, Socrates. I believe that it is important to have an age of consent to protect children from sexual predators and ensure that they are not taken advantage of.
Socrates: I see. But do you believe that all individuals under the age of consent are children?
Katrina: Yes, I do. They are not yet adults and therefore cannot fully understand the consequences of their actions.
Socrates: But what do you mean by “fully understand the consequences of their actions”? Are teenagers not sexually mature and able to reproduce?
Katrina: Yes, but that doesn’t mean they are emotionally mature enough to handle the consequences of sexual activity.
Socrates: I understand your point, but is it not a biological fact that human females are sexually mature and able to reproduce during their teenage years?
Katrina: Yes, but that doesn’t mean they should be engaging in sexual activity at such a young age.
Socrates: But why should human females wait beyond the age of sexual maturity to reproduce, while other animals do not?
Katrina: That’s because humans have evolved to have a more complex society where reproduction and sexuality are not just about biological urges, but also involve emotional and social factors.
Socrates: I agree that human society is complex, but does that mean that we should disregard biology altogether? Is it not arbitrary to decide that someone is not ready to engage in sexual activity until they reach a certain age?
Katrina: No, it’s not arbitrary. We have decided on an age of consent based on the understanding that individuals below that age are not yet fully mature and cannot make informed decisions about their sexual behavior.
Socrates: I understand your reasoning, but have we truly considered all of the factors at play here? Is it not possible that our society has constructed the idea of an age of consent as a means of inflating the sexual marketplace value of older women, while simultaneously lowering the birthrate?
Katrina: I don’t see how the age of consent could have anything to do with the birthrate.
Socrates: Consider this: if teenagers are sexually mature and capable of reproducing, why should we discourage them from doing so? Could it be that by forcing individuals to wait until a certain age to engage in sexual activity, we are inadvertently contributing to a declining birthrate?
Katrina: I understand your point, but I still believe that an age of consent is necessary to protect young people from sexual predators.
Socrates: I agree that we should protect young people from harm, but is it not possible to do so without imposing an arbitrary age of consent? Instead of relying on age-based restrictions, why not focus on educating individuals about sexual health and consent, and empowering them to make informed decisions?
Katrina: That’s a good point, Socrates. I see now that the age of consent may not be the most effective way to protect young people.
Socrates: I am glad that we have come to an understanding, Katrina. It is important that we consider all perspectives and weigh the evidence before coming to a conclusion. -
2023-02-27 at 6:13 PM UTC
-
2023-02-27 at 6:30 PM UTC
