User Controls

The butcher's bill in coming in for the vaxx

  1. Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson You can't answer it can you…because you have NO data…only conspiracy nuttiness…

    BILLLLLLLLIOOONS dispensed…

    30 or so DIRECT deaths?

    Lets do the risk calculation shall we?

    Talk about retardedness

    "uh yeah my passenger door window motor doesn't work either…WE HAVE THE PROOF!"

    data will be coming .... soon ...

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-11671587/Massive-spike-excess-deaths-sparks-calls-urgent-investigation.html
  2. aldra JIDF Controlled Opposition
    Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson You can't answer it can you…because you have NO data…only conspiracy nuttiness…

    how would you go about achieving data that is acceptable to you? there's plenty of correlatory and statistical data, but who do you propose to test it and implement procedures? how do you think you could convince doctors to actually investigate whether 'died suddenlies' could be linked to the 'vaccines' when that link could directly affect their livelihoods?

    you're insisting your house isn't on fire because the smoke alarm hasn't gone off yet.
  3. Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson BILLLLLLLLIOOONS dispensed…

    30 or so DIRECT deaths? PROOF!"

    for something that doesnt work even 1 single death is too many.
  4. Originally posted by vindicktive vinny if people who died with covid are considered covid deaths shouldnt people who died with covid vaxxine be considered to be covid vaxxine deaths.

    No.
  5. aldra JIDF Controlled Opposition
    Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson No.

    why, is it a dishonest standard of measurement?
  6. Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson No.

    nice gymnastic move
  7. Originally posted by vindicktive vinny for something that doesnt work even 1 single death is too many.

    Well it's been statistically proven to work simply from the dramatic drop in hospitalizations, death rates and severity of illness in those that have had the vaccine since the vaccine was introduced. That's a measurable amount. 30 odd deaths globally isn't really indicative of anything.

    Not to mention the fact most deaths/hospitalizations are the un-vaccinated.
  8. Originally posted by vindicktive vinny nice gymnastic move

    You feel 1 direct two letter word is gymnastics?
  9. aldra JIDF Controlled Opposition
    Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson Well it's been statistically proven to work simply from the dramatic drop in hospitalizations, death rates and severity of illness in those that have had the vaccine since the vaccine was introduced. That's a measurable amount. 30 odd deaths globally isn't really indicative of anything.

    how can you claim that a drop in hospitalisations and deaths was due to the 'vaccination' drive when they're being measured using an inherently dishonest metric?
  10. Ghost Black Hole
    Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson How many deaths have been DIRECTLY linked to the covid vaccine…and how many covid vaccines have been dispensed?.


    a FEW at least. The notion that it's harmless is false, I mean generally yeah I think the YOULLVE ALL GET BELLS PALSY AND GO STERILE ANY MINUTE NOW is dumb but so is the OMG ITS TOTALLY SAFE YOU LITERALLY NEED THE VACCINE TO BREATHE WTFFFF like nah i'm pretty sure taking it or not taking it pretty much only increases and lowers the numbers by only a few %

    if you are the lucky 1% that dies from a vaccine or a covid than sucks to be you I guess.
  11. Rape Monster Naturally Camouflaged
  12. Ghost Black Hole
    Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson You can't answer it can you…because you have NO data…only conspiracy nuttiness…

    BILLLLLLLLIOOONS dispensed…

    30 or so DIRECT deaths?

    30 would be like 0.0001%

    pretty sure the vax death toll is probably at least a few hundred, usually thats what happens when your OPERATION WARP SPEED and don't FDA test a drug properly, i mean not really but sometimes

    lots of drugs kill people every year it's just part of how modern medicine works. a few hundred dying is WORTH SAVING THE MANY and nobody is saying we should ban tylenol because it kills several hundred people a year (good luck finding that data it's not widely publicized for obvious reasons)

    ASK YOUR DCOTOR TODAY THIS ONLY HAS 1% CHANCE OF KILLING YOU
  13. Ghost Black Hole
    BIG PHARMA IS ALWAYS RIGHT TRUST THE SCIENCE is the same brainwash used by big pharma to keep americans hooked on drugs that make them wig out and do rooty tooties

    http://www.bigskywords.com/montana-blog/does-teen-antidepressant-use-cause-more-school-shootings


  14. Originally posted by aldra how can you claim that a drop in hospitalisations and deaths was due to the 'vaccination' drive when they're being measured using an inherently dishonest metric?

    What's dishonest about hospital admission records and their load capacity??
  15. Originally posted by Ghost 30 would be like 0.0001%

    Um it's MUCH lower than that, again out of billions...add a dozen extra 0s and you'll be looking more realistic.

    ETA: There have been approx 12.7 billion covid vaccines dispensed to date.

    https://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/covid-vaccine-tracker-global-distribution/
  16. 12.7 billion and again..how many directly linked deaths? Anyone have that figure and source or are we just going conspiracy nut theory?
  17. Ghost Black Hole
    Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson Um it's MUCH lower than that

    There is no way anyone can make a drug that fast without killing a few HUNDRED people, it's impossible and has never happened except for maybe synthetic cannabis like marinol or something


    adverse drug reactions kill many people every year

  18. aldra JIDF Controlled Opposition
    Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson What's dishonest about hospital admission records and their load capacity??

    the fact that they're being attributed to COVID? as above, we were just discussing? even aside from (intentional) misattribution of deaths there are studies that show 60% of people who were admitted to hospital for 'COVID' never showed any symptoms associated with a serious infection.

    add to that the fact that hospitals immediately canceled 'elective surgeries' for the next few months, where 'elective' means the patient is not at risk of death in the next seven days, and you have a massive follow-on effect of people dying from a lack of treatment.


    thanks to the media frenzy, paranoiacs and hypochondriacs flooded the hospital the moment they got a cough, and were given priority over people who 'weren't at risk of immediate death', who were essentially turned away until they were at the point of dying
  19. Originally posted by aldra the fact that they're being attributed to COVID?

    No, those hospitalizations were definitely diagnosed covid cases.

    Why do you think the MASSIVE intake numbers has decreased to a little above normal levels here lately...luck?
  20. aldra JIDF Controlled Opposition
    Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson No, those hospitalizations were definitely diagnosed covid cases.

    deaths. but we also know that the PCR tests for at least the first few months were run at such a high sensitivity that they were completely unreliable, so there's that too
Jump to Top