User Controls
US Senate report concludes covid probably came from a lab
-
2022-12-16 at 4:54 PM UTCOh and the world leaders are not "taking their orders" from him
-
2022-12-16 at 5:28 PM UTC
Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson Again, simply because someone is in a position of power doesn't mean they are any different from anyone else when it comes to being a fucking nut…your "fact" he met with world leaders has ZERO to do with his nutty nature and is quite irrelevant.
Then why do world leaders keep attending his summits, time after time after time? Because they don't believe his ramblings? Your "logic" is a mess, kid. -
2022-12-16 at 5:50 PM UTC
Originally posted by ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ Then why do world leaders keep attending his summits, time after time after time? Because they don't believe his ramblings? Your "logic" is a mess, kid.
The G20 meetings are not "his summits"...
Just as I demonstrated with the Qaddafi speech...simply because they are there doesn't mean they are there for the nutty speakers. -
2022-12-16 at 5:56 PM UTCDavos 2022 attendees.
World Economic Forum. Ambassador Miller welcomes the opportunity to advance the Biden-Harris Administration’s agenda with world leaders and underscore America’s commitment to building stronger partnerships and promoting economic prosperity. Other U.S. government officials traveling to Davos are as follows:
Secretary of Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo
Special Presidential Envoy for Climate John Kerry
Chair of the Board of Directors of the U.S. Export-Import Bank Reta Jo Lewis
Senator Patrick Leahy
Senator Chris Coons
Senator Deb Fischer
Senator John Hickenlooper
Senator Bob Menendez
Senator Pat Toomey
Senator Sheldon Whitehouse
Senator Roger Wicker
Representative Gregory W. Meeks
Representative Madeleine Dean
Representative Ted Deutch
Representative Darrell Issa
Representative William KeatingRepresentative Ted Lieu
Representative Michael M. McCaul
Representative Dan Meuser
Representative Seth Moulton
Representative Joe Neguse
Representative Dean Phillips
Representative Ann Wagne
...so no actual "world leaders listed"...and again, there for the non nutty meetings. -
2022-12-16 at 5:59 PM UTChttps://www.weforum.org/agenda/2022/06/davos-2022-key-themes-global-cooperation-health-equity-digital-inclusion-economic-outlook/
This year, 2,500 world leaders and experts (ED: scoff) reconvened in Davos to address the most pressing challenges of our time: Ukraine and the future of the global world order, the growing urgency of the climate crisis and its impact on food and poverty, the outlook for the recession and the future of work, and how to end COVID-19 and prepare for the next pandemic when many countries still don’t have access to vaccines.
So nothing about a great reset or NWO... -
2022-12-16 at 9:37 PM UTC
Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2022/06/davos-2022-key-themes-global-cooperation-health-equity-digital-inclusion-economic-outlook/
This year, 2,500 world leaders and experts (ED: scoff) reconvened in Davos to address the most pressing challenges of our time: Ukraine and the future of the global world order, the growing urgency of the climate crisis and its impact on food and poverty, the outlook for the recession and the future of work, and how to end COVID-19 and prepare for the next pandemic when many countries still don’t have access to vaccines.
So nothing about a great reset or NWO…
Wow. You are especially dense. -
2022-12-16 at 9:57 PM UTCGreat comeback kid!
-
2022-12-16 at 11:50 PM UTC
-
2022-12-16 at 11:54 PM UTC
-
2022-12-19 at 5:58 PM UTCI thought you conspiracy nuts said Covid didn't exist???
-
2022-12-19 at 6:01 PM UTC
Originally posted by Donald Trump https://www.help.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/report_an_analysis_of_the_origins_of_covid-19_102722.pdf
Covid was the most expensive science related accident ever. After seeing what has happened we should be asking ourselves if science should be banned forever.
its a bio weapon and so is the vax,, both brought to you by the WEF and the CCP with Fouche's help -
2022-12-19 at 8:02 PM UTC
-
2022-12-19 at 9:33 PM UTC
-
2022-12-19 at 11:31 PM UTC
Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson Well if the pandemic doesn't exist then what does it matter if it was developed in a lab or a monkey's ass? It doesn't
LOGIC…it's whats for afternoon tea.
If someone dropped a fresh turd in your living room, it doesn't stop you from living, but you'd still want to know who dropped it. -
2022-12-20 at 12:24 AM UTC
Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson Well if the pandemic doesn't exist then what does it matter if it was developed in a lab or a monkey's ass? It doesn't
LOGIC…it's whats for afternoon tea.
because its paramount to determine if its either an attempted biological attack or an act of gods.
for insurance and other purposes. -
2022-12-20 at 4:34 AM UTCOr an act of teh Buddha or some shit.
-
2022-12-20 at 4:49 AM UTC
Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson Well if the pandemic doesn't exist then what does it matter if it was developed in a lab or a monkey's ass? It doesn't
LOGIC…it's whats for afternoon tea.
it's not that the 'pandemic didn't exist', though I guess there are some people that believe COVID19 was never a real thing
it's that standard respiratory illnesses like the flu were categorised as a new terrorvirus (perhaps intentionally or perhaps through poor testing/sorting methodologies) and used to justify lockdowns and 'vaccination' campaigns that have done far more damage than the virus ever did -
2022-12-20 at 5 AM UTCAll their bogus numbers came from faulty models, not from real case numbers. No autopsies. No proper testing, as a PCR test is unable to identify viruses. The frauds also claimed people who died with covid died of covid, then retracted, but didn't fix the numbers. Top-down political pressure. Massive financial incentives to "identify" covid cases. 99.97% survival rate. Put it all together and you're left with nothing but a fake pandemic.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2022-12-20 at 9:46 AM UTC
Originally posted by ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ No proper testing, as a PCR test is unable to identify viruses.
I don't know the details of lateral-flow and pcr tests, but they consistently reported my state of infection correctly, and all test results corresponded with events and onset of symptoms. I was testing a lot, because people I was in close contact with caught the rona in sequence, and I was last (nearly avoided it).
The chance of two independent forms of tests repeatedly (e.g. something like 5 times in a row) getting correspondingly correct results seems slim to me. -
2022-12-20 at 9:52 AM UTC
Originally posted by troon I don't know the details of lateral-flow and pcr tests, but they consistently reported my state of infection correctly, and all test results corresponded with events and onset of symptoms. I was testing a lot, because people I was in close contact with caught the rona in sequence, and I was last (nearly avoided it).
The chance of two independent forms of tests repeatedly (e.g. something like 5 times in a row) getting correspondingly correct results seems slim to me.
PCR tests weren't designed to detect viruses and it's dubious how well they work in that regard, even in a general sense, but the testing methodology used has been flawed to say the least
Originally posted by aldra There's nothing to be gained from engaging with MMR and nobody else responded.
1. Initial test kits distributed by the CDC were flawed/contaminated apparently requiring a completely new source for some materials. I noticed articles indicating the issue had been resolved a month or so later but there appears to be very little information available on the flaw or how it was rectified.
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/02/12/health/coronavirus-test-kits-cdc.html
2. The kind of test done essentially looks for viral material in the suspension fluid, not the cells themselves that have been collected. While it's a more economical method especially for mass testing, it's been demonstrated to have significant false-positive and false-negative rates (up to 50% combined).
http://www.int-soc-clin-geriat.com/info/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/Dr.-Lees-paper-on-testing-for-SARS-CoV-2.pdf
3. The PCR tests used to analyse samples are typically run at a much higher sensitivity than for any other disease, far higher than even CDC guidelines. Typical virus tests are run through 30-35 cycles, the CDC guideline for COVID19 is 33, and the majority (~90%) of tests are run through 40. At such a sensitivity, dead and inactive viruses trigger positives, as do partial DNA fragments.
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/08/29/health/coronavirus-testing.html
https://www.advisory.com/daily-briefing/2020/09/01/covid-testsThe following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
