fields in which experts don't exist

1. 2022-10-22 at 4:16 AM UTC

   #1
   lockedin Tuskegee Airman
   The author of this post has returned to nothingness
2. 2022-10-22 at 4:18 AM UTC

   #2
   

   aldra JIDF Controlled Opposition
   anywhere you don't have hard metrics to assess competence
3. 2022-10-22 at 8:31 AM UTC

   #3
   RIPtotse victim of incest [my adversative decurved garbo]
   Empyrical data > other data
4. 2022-10-22 at 9:36 AM UTC

   #4
   

   Ghost Black Hole
   what are you some kinda expert on fields?
5. 2022-10-22 at 9:41 AM UTC

   #5
   The Self Taught Man Black Hole

   Originally posted by lockedin psychology
   sociology
   political science
   macroeconomics
   
   what else?

   
   I am bigly an expert in all those things.
6. 2022-10-22 at 11:20 AM UTC

   #6
   

   Instigator Naturally Camouflaged [the staring tame crusher]
   Leftfield
7. 2022-10-22 at 11:47 AM UTC

   #7
   RIPtotse victim of incest [my adversative decurved garbo]
   Im a field exphart
8. 2022-10-22 at 11:47 AM UTC

   #8
   RIPtotse victim of incest [my adversative decurved garbo]
   I fart in the field
9. 2022-10-22 at 11:58 AM UTC

   #9
   The Self Taught Man Black Hole
   
   I am out standing in my own field.
10. 2022-10-22 at 12:50 PM UTC

    #10
    

    Bradley Florida Man
    love
    interpersonal communication
    sucking dick
11. 2022-10-22 at 1:38 PM UTC

    #11
    

    Instigator Naturally Camouflaged [the staring tame crusher]
    Flanders
12. 2022-10-27 at 3:45 PM UTC

    #12
    Jiggaboo_Johnson Black Hole

    Originally posted by lockedin psychology
    sociology
    political science
    macroeconomics
    
    what else?

    
    Astrology
    Ufology
    Paranormal
    any of that dumb fairytale shit.
13. 2022-10-27 at 3:46 PM UTC

    #13
    

    Ghost Black Hole

    Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson Astrology
    Ufology
    Paranormal
    any of that dumb fairytale shit.

    
    And you are an expert on what is or not a fairytale? I dunno being a "fairy tale expert" sounds like some made up shit to me, I think you just personally don't like those subject s
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!

    • I Live In Your Crawlspace Secretly4
14. 2022-10-27 at 3:48 PM UTC

    #14
    

    vindicktive vinny Black Hole
    climate changes
    
    gender studies
    
    women empowerment
    
    diversity equity and inclusivity studies
15. 2022-10-27 at 3:51 PM UTC

    #15
    

    Ghost Black Hole

    Originally posted by vindicktive vinny climate changes
    
    gender studies
    
    women empowerment
    
    diversity equity and inclusivity studies

    
    
    
    

    Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson Astrology
    Ufology
    Paranormal
    any of that dumb fairytale shit.

    
    
    
    

    Originally posted by lockedin psychology
    sociology
    political science
    macroeconomics
    
    what else?

    
    Pretty sure these are all valid subjects, millions of search results which means people study them. Your fake kike covid books that faucci uses to justify his jab aren't real scientific joirnals. I bet you also believe in climate change and that the vaccine isn't literal rat poison.
    
    Okay EXPERTS thanks for listing your list of things you don't like, nobody asked or cares your opinion on these things.
16. 2022-10-27 at 3:52 PM UTC

    #16
    Jiggaboo_Johnson Black Hole

    Originally posted by Ghost Pretty sure these are all valid subjects

    
    
    
    Who told you that, your horoscope expert or the grey aliens?
17. 2022-10-27 at 4:07 PM UTC

    #17
    

    Ghost Black Hole
    If a % of the population has an interest in studying something I think it meets the criteria of being "valid" unless you got your university nerd goggles strapped on and think YOU CAN'T USE SLANG THATS noT PROPER ENGLISH OMG YOU CAN'T JUST MAKE UP NEW WORDS LANGUAGE DOESn"T WORK LIKE THAT OKAY PAL IM AN ENGLISH MAJOR AND YOU NEED A FUCKING COMMA PERIOD MIDDLE END STRUCTURE OR YOU HAVE NOTHING, MIGHT AS WELL JUST BARK LIKE DOGS AND FLAIL OUR ARMS AROUND!!!!
    
    ayo nigey dat chit ain't right yo
    
    Which SCI is it, anyway?
    
    SCI-ENCE: If you want to hang with the hard-core 'Academigos', they insist
    on data being rendered in the appropriate techno-speak and be provable,
    quantifiable, and repeatable, or at least FOOTnoted.
    
    SCI-CHOLOGY: Offers much more latitude to the researcher/writer... One can
    more easily start with a conclusion and work backwards, or begin with the
    data, then research the various interdisciplinary schools, translate to the
    suitable vernacular, and stretch toward the desired conclusion... However,
    acceptability of the results depends less on the work and more on the
    weight of the author. While charisma and salesmanship are a plus, stature
    and tenure are the real determiners of acceptance... One must also stay
    abreast of fashionable trends and internal politics if he wishes to express
    the facts accurately.
    
    SCI-ENTOLOGY: In it's primary sense as a model of interpreting reality,
    before it was co-opted by posed-modern, pulp-religions, the Jetsons, (his
    son) Elroy Hubburd, and a bewildered flock of investors. The information
    need only correspond to academic disciplines in so much as they are
    understood by the researcher. SCIENTOLOGICAL findings and data are
    therefore emitted as quantum in self-contained thought packets which
    utilize the Interactive worldView Protocol. Certain findings or discoveries
    may even require their own operating systems as they cannot be made to run
    on existing platforms. Referred to as Sci-fi by some, but is generally more
    lucrative.
    
    SCI-CHOTIC: Is absolute in it's subjectivity. Information is gathered and
    organized in such a way that is incomprehensible unless one is actually
    experiencing it in its full ambiguity. All theoretical constructs are
    fluid and temporal.
18. 2022-10-27 at 4:08 PM UTC

    #18
    Jiggaboo_Johnson Black Hole

    Originally posted by Ghost If a % of the population has an interest in studying something I think it meets the criteria of being "valid" unless you got your university nerd goggles strapped on and think YOU CAN'T USE SLANG THATS noT PROPER ENGLISH OMG YOU CAN'T JUST MAKE UP NEW WORDS LANGUAGE DOESn"T WORK LIKE THAT OKAY PAL IM AN ENGLISH MAJOR AND YOU NEED A FUCKING COMMA PERIOD MIDDLE END STRUCTURE OR YOU HAVE NOTHING, MIGHT AS WELL JUST BARK LIKE DOGS AND FLAIL OUR ARMS AROUND!!!!
    
    ayo nigey dat chit ain't right yo
    
    Which SCI is it, anyway?
    
    SCI-ENCE: If you want to hang with the hard-core 'Academigos', they insist
    on data being rendered in the appropriate techno-speak and be provable,
    quantifiable, and repeatable, or at least FOOTnoted.
    
    SCI-CHOLOGY: Offers much more latitude to the researcher/writer… One can
    more easily start with a conclusion and work backwards, or begin with the
    data, then research the various interdisciplinary schools, translate to the
    suitable vernacular, and stretch toward the desired conclusion… However,
    acceptability of the results depends less on the work and more on the
    weight of the author. While charisma and salesmanship are a plus, stature
    and tenure are the real determiners of acceptance… One must also stay
    abreast of fashionable trends and internal politics if he wishes to express
    the facts accurately.
    
    SCI-ENTOLOGY: In it's primary sense as a model of interpreting reality,
    before it was co-opted by posed-modern, pulp-religions, the Jetsons, (his
    son) Elroy Hubburd, and a bewildered flock of investors. The information
    need only correspond to academic disciplines in so much as they are
    understood by the researcher. SCIENTOLOGICAL findings and data are
    therefore emitted as quantum in self-contained thought packets which
    utilize the Interactive worldView Protocol. Certain findings or discoveries
    may even require their own operating systems as they cannot be made to run
    on existing platforms. Referred to as Sci-fi by some, but is generally more
    lucrative.
    
    SCI-CHOTIC: Is absolute in it's subjectivity. Information is gathered and
    organized in such a way that is incomprehensible unless one is actually
    experiencing it in its full ambiguity. All theoretical constructs are
    fluid and temporal.

    
    STL1 level response.
19. 2022-10-27 at 4:28 PM UTC

    #19
    

    Ghost Black Hole
    nah he posts news articles, thats an underground chemist explaining how there are no real "experts" in anything and in fact the so called "experts" are usually just a bunch of fart huffing smelling each others ass fumes and if you try to talk to them like a normal person not like some self important academic fuck head know it all, they won't take you seriously and probably make fun of you later for not being part of the mileu
    
    Armchair expert milieu yeah you guys sure love experts which is why you totally believe all the modern journals about LGBT transgender studies and covid vaccines, right? You aren't anti science wackjobs against climate change are you?
    
    Trust the science!
    
    
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!

    • The Self Taught Man
20. 2022-10-27 at 4:30 PM UTC

    #20
    

    Ghost Black Hole
    All of the above are all valid fields or subjects
    
    but if it's not STEM it doesn't matter and nobody gives a shit