User Controls

Roe V Wade is Dead

  1. #81
    aldra JIDF Controlled Opposition
    Originally posted by Kafka “Electronic aids, particularly domestic computers, will help the inner migration, the opting out of reality. Reality is no longer going to be the stuff out there, but the stuff inside your head. It's going to be commercial and nasty at the same time.”
    J.G. Ballard

    that's more talking about VR and foregoing the real world for more idealistic dream worlds, eventually leading the outside world to ruin

    what I mean is that we're at a point where external attacks on your brain are becoming increasingly plausible even for non-specialists (the conspiracy-minded have talked about the possibility of radio devices, like LRAD and V2K systems and even cellular phone signals being able to affect your thought patterns for decades now), and people will naturally seek protection from companies offering solutions. think neuralink, or cyberbrain tech from Ghost in the Shell.

    think about how little you understand how your computer operates - even specialists can't keep up with the deluge of new technologies, especially since so much of it is proprietary and not fully documented (if at all). in recent years we had Windows Telemetry secretly linked into everything VC++ compiles, Intel Management Engine being able to create network connections and datastreams that are totally invisible to the operating system... one of the most intricate things I've ever seen was exposed by Snowden - the NSA is actually able to rewrite the firmware on many harddrives to secretly store and transfer data without any component beyond the harddrive able to detect it.

    now apply that to a chip embedded inside you that you have no way to directly understand or control. could you even dig it out without the chip stopping you 'for your own safety'?

    consider that you have the option to either be vulnerable to people fucking with your brain remotely or to go to a company for protection, where they embed a chip that blocks that external interference but you have no way of knowing what else it does.

    you lose sovereignty of your mind either way.
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  2. #82
    Kafka sweaty
    Originally posted by aldra that's more talking about VR and foregoing the real world for more idealistic dream worlds, eventually leading the outside world to ruin

    what I mean is that we're at a point where external attacks on your brain are becoming increasingly plausible even for non-specialists (the conspiracy-minded have talked about the possibility of radio devices, like LRAD and V2K systems and even cellular phone signals being able to affect your thought patterns for decades now), and people will naturally seek protection from companies offering solutions. think neuralink, or cyberbrain tech from Ghost in the Shell.

    think about how little you understand how your computer operates - even specialists can't keep up with the deluge of new technologies, especially since so much of it is proprietary and not fully documented (if at all). in recent years we had Windows Telemetry secretly linked into everything VC++ compiles, Intel Management Engine being able to create network connections and datastreams that are totally invisible to the operating system… one of the most intricate things I've ever seen was exposed by Snowden - the NSA is actually able to rewrite the firmware on many harddrives to secretly store and transfer data without any component beyond the harddrive able to detect it.

    now apply that to a chip embedded inside you that you have no way to directly understand or control. could you even dig it out without the chip stopping you 'for your own safety'?

    consider that you have the option to either be vulnerable to people fucking with your brain remotely or to go to a company for protection, where they embed a chip that blocks that external interference but you have no way of knowing what else it does.

    you lose sovereignty of your mind either way.

    A vr headset is next on my shopping list tbh. Did you see this?
    https://metro.co.uk/2019/07/31/facebook-can-literally-read-mind-decode-thoughts-10493373/amp/
  3. #83
    Sudo Black Hole [my hereto riemannian peach]
    Originally posted by aldra that's more talking about VR and foregoing the real world for more idealistic dream worlds, eventually leading the outside world to ruin

    what I mean is that we're at a point where external attacks on your brain are becoming increasingly plausible even for non-specialists (the conspiracy-minded have talked about the possibility of radio devices, like LRAD and V2K systems and even cellular phone signals being able to affect your thought patterns for decades now), and people will naturally seek protection from companies offering solutions. think neuralink, or cyberbrain tech from Ghost in the Shell.

    think about how little you understand how your computer operates - even specialists can't keep up with the deluge of new technologies, especially since so much of it is proprietary and not fully documented (if at all). in recent years we had Windows Telemetry secretly linked into everything VC++ compiles, Intel Management Engine being able to create network connections and datastreams that are totally invisible to the operating system… one of the most intricate things I've ever seen was exposed by Snowden - the NSA is actually able to rewrite the firmware on many harddrives to secretly store and transfer data without any component beyond the harddrive able to detect it.

    now apply that to a chip embedded inside you that you have no way to directly understand or control. could you even dig it out without the chip stopping you 'for your own safety'?

    consider that you have the option to either be vulnerable to people fucking with your brain remotely or to go to a company for protection, where they embed a chip that blocks that external interference but you have no way of knowing what else it does.

    you lose sovereignty of your mind either way.

    I also own one of those cellular telephones
  4. #84
    cigreting Dark Matter
    Originally posted by Sudo Shut up, sex offender incel. You are not qualified to have an opinion, even as hilariously retarded and based on your own victimhood as it is.

    Do you wish you were aborted?

    ye me seks ofnd ur gram bludy ming wil i suk ur unkl bols fagit
  5. #85
    Speedy Parker Black Hole [my absentmindedly lachrymatory gazania]
    Originally posted by Sudo Speedy parker gets so tickled when he feels like his dumbshit opinions allow him to be treated like an adult who matters. Its pretty hikkish

    It's so nice to hear you announce your butthurt from the rooftops.
  6. #86
    RIPtotse victim of incest [my adversative decurved garbo]
    All you Maga pro life idiots are fucking morons. MORE LAWS ARE ALWAYS FUCKING RETARDED.
  7. #87
    Sudo Black Hole [my hereto riemannian peach]
    Originally posted by Speedy Parker It's so nice to hear you announce your butthurt from the rooftops.

    When people laugh at your nose hole is it because they are "butthurt?"
  8. #88
    Speedy Parker Black Hole [my absentmindedly lachrymatory gazania]
    Originally posted by Sudo When people laugh at your nose hole is it because they are "butthurt?"

    If that's all you got move along kid, cuz you couldn't use IRL.
  9. #89
    troon African Astronaut
    "ah, it was no right, ah had tae tap it's heed"

    The gypsies and tinkers were fine about postpartum abortion.
Jump to Top