User Controls

If Elon Musk buys Twitter

  1. Originally posted by smokemon That's a slippery logic slope, m'dude.

    When you say "abuse," what would constitute abuse in your eyes?

    Kind of reminds me of the people who proclaim they don't mind the government spying on them because they're not doing anything wrong so they have nothing to hide.

    Another retard take.

    No it's not a slippery slope at all. Abuse means breaking their TOS.

    This has nothing to do with government spying, don't be a retarded moron, please, you people are giving me brain AIDS with these shitty responses.

    This is a privately owned social networking platform. Anonymity isn't required everywhere, there are plenty of occasions both in our daily lives and online where we voluntarily do not remain anonymous, like when you meet a person IRL and go "hello, my name is Fred".

    In this case we are discussing this privately owned social networking platform making the decision to forgo anonymity because it is the source of abuse on their platform. Tell me why that is a bad decision. Be specific. Otherwise I'm not interested because you are just a coward, why would I care?
  2. the man who put it in my hood Black Hole [miraculously counterclaim my golf]
    Originally posted by Who are you, John Joke (inventor of jokes)? Anonymity isn't required everywhere,

    It also isn't not required anywhere.

    As a private entity your opinion is meaningless as is one that supports anonymity. This is just the same argument as "it's lannies forum he can do what he wants"

    yeah, pretty much. It's up to them if it's worth it to fend off bots and spammers for advertisers. I wonder what will happen -_-

    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  3. the man who put it in my hood Black Hole [miraculously counterclaim my golf]
    twitter should require a white hand check verification and if you can't pass that you get banned
  4. The ability to post should require nothing less than fingerprints and anal swabs.
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  5. smokemon Houston
    yes
  6. It's not like you're demanding the user's firstborn child as collateral to post nicely or anything.
  7. Sudo Black Hole [my hereto riemannian peach]
    Originally posted by Who are you, John Joke (inventor of jokes)? Another retard take.

    No it's not a slippery slope at all. Abuse means breaking their TOS.

    This has nothing to do with government spying, don't be a retarded moron, please, you people are giving me brain AIDS with these shitty responses.

    This is a privately owned social networking platform. Anonymity isn't required everywhere, there are plenty of occasions both in our daily lives and online where we voluntarily do not remain anonymous, like when you meet a person IRL and go "hello, my name is Fred".

    In this case we are discussing this privately owned social networking platform making the decision to forgo anonymity because it is the source of abuse on their platform. Tell me why that is a bad decision. Be specific. Otherwise I'm not interested because you are just a coward, why would I care?

    Are you playing devil's advocate because you need attention, because you are bored or because you are stupid? I'm betting it's all three
  8. the man who put it in my hood Black Hole [miraculously counterclaim my golf]
    I have had a twitter account since 017 and have been "skimozed" on the NFT thing so I feel like an ID verification is a slap in the face how about an NFT or web3 verification instead? Klaus Schwab??? hello?


    Originally posted by the man who put it in my hood LMAO seethe leftists I told you LANNY web3 is coming better submit that pull now or be left behind in the dust of the metaverse





  9. Originally posted by Who are you, John Joke (inventor of jokes)? you people are giving me brain AIDS

    I hate to tell you this, but you were born that way
  10. Meikai Heck This Schlong
    Originally posted by the man who put it in my hood

    captain falcon like:
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  11. Lodger Free African Astronaut
    I'm just like me!
    We all are!
  12. the man who put it in my hood Black Hole [miraculously counterclaim my golf]
    God I hate Pakis/Indians so fucking much. As soon as you hear that voice and see the brown you just know they are the type to call the cops, to have an hours long discussion on "southern asian pride" and diversity. They are nothing but kike hand puppets and are still economically irrelevant and NOT a military superpower despite being the most populous diaspora next to Chinese.

    Their culture is fucked they don't drink or eat beef. THey will 100% sell out twitter to THE BIG KIKE because thats the PC diversity leftists soulless indian paki culture thing to do. You never see pakis or indians on social media because they have no souls they just want to make YOUR life worse, eat indian food and watch bollywood until they die

    Someone needs to drop a nuke on that part of the world please for the love of God
  13. Speedy Parker Black Hole
    Originally posted by Lodger Free Been up all night because I been sleeping too much.

    Trying to reset my internal clock. Gonna go to work early. Go park at Safeway and try and make ap money buying people's shit

    It's been really strange lately, the days just fly by.

    CoViD shutin makes a normal blah day feel like summer vacation to a child

    Now they're saying some new strain is coming back the week or days after Dr Fauci declares the end of global level pandemic to the Endemic which has been in Cali over a month

    Fuck this shit. I got a message to go get booster 4

    Just die would ya
  14. troon African Astronaut
    Originally posted by the man who put it in my hood God I hate Pakis/Indians so fucking much. As soon as you hear that voice and see the brown you just know they are the type to call the cops, to have an hours long discussion on "southern asian pride" and diversity. They are nothing but kike hand puppets and are still economically irrelevant and NOT a military superpower despite being the most populous diaspora next to Chinese.

    Their culture is fucked they don't drink or eat beef. THey will 100% sell out twitter to THE BIG KIKE because thats the PC diversity leftists soulless indian paki culture thing to do. You never see pakis or indians on social media because they have no souls they just want to make YOUR life worse, eat indian food and watch bollywood until they die

    Someone needs to drop a nuke on that part of the world please for the love of God

    You care too much about twitter. It's only real to you because you allow it to be.
  15. Somebody should open up a new one called TWEETER.
  16. Originally posted by Who are you, John Joke (inventor of jokes)? Twitter is a privately owned microblogging social network. No one who isn't abusing Twitter needs anonymity on it.

    Also makes sense if it's publicly anonymous but does require an undisclosed ID verification for accounts.

    this post reeks of dalitness and i wonder y.
  17. Originally posted by the man who put it in my hood It also isn't not required anywhere.

    Sure it is. You go up to someone and say "hello, my name is [your name]" for example.
  18. the man who put it in my hood Black Hole [miraculously counterclaim my golf]
    Originally posted by Who are you, John Joke (inventor of jokes)? Sure it is. You go up to someone and say "hello, my name is [your name]" for example.

    Says a person using an anonymous account
  19. aldra JIDF Controlled Opposition
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  20. mmQ Lisa Turtle
    It doesn't matter cuz THE SINGULARITY is gonna happen real soon, so just go ahead and hope for the best but prepare/assume for the worst.
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
Jump to Top