2017-04-24 at 1:16 PM UTC
Esplender
Tuskegee Airman
[my gynecological profit-maximising katar]
Well, gay marriage did become a thing so I don't see why not for self driving cars
2017-04-24 at 1:44 PM UTC
Put a brick on the acceleration BOOM self driving car. Oh you want it to steer itself too? Well fuck should have been more specific.
2017-04-25 at 11:34 AM UTC
Originally posted by Malice
Subjugate yourself to AGI. I no longer have an ultimate concern for human judgement and am not under the illusion that it may not well be critically flawed. We are absolutely pitiful creatures, just as 1st worlders may pity a 3rd on cold and dark night, waiting alone for a late bus that may never arrive.
Drink your alcohol and tell yourself it's going to be alright, hold someone close to you.
Don't paint the rest of the race with the same defective brush that miscreated you.
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
2017-11-21 at 2:07 AM UTC
Mine are self-driving, @ times.
2017-11-21 at 5:29 AM UTC
Honestly I think they sound totally fuck tarded no matter how advanced they become. I'm going to laugh when someone really important (or not) dies from being ran over by one of these things.
2017-11-21 at 4:15 PM UTC
Originally posted by RestStop
Honestly I think they sound totally fuck tarded no matter how advanced they become. I'm going to laugh when someone really important (or not) dies from being ran over by one of these things.
It won't be me because I'm never getting near one.
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
2017-11-21 at 4:43 PM UTC
Obbe
Alan What?
[annoy my right-angled speediness]
Yes it will happen and overall it will make transportation safer, but like the Unabomber said, as technology/the system continues to grow it will continue to erode humanity and freedom, changing human behavior to suit the needs of the system, and then one day before you know it we won't even be humans anymore. So it goes.
2017-11-21 at 4:53 PM UTC
Originally posted by Speedy Parker
It won't be me because I'm never getting near one.
Same.
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
2017-11-21 at 8:54 PM UTC
it notdriven by itself its driven by a living being concealed under the floor bords fed by sweat collected from the ppls sweat into the seats and fed int o him his dick drags on the rode to sense if the car is serving sideways or beung forwards also leaveing a small trail of elesoplasm so other cars no were to go from beihind it smells funny but its ok
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
2017-11-21 at 9:04 PM UTC
elpm musk is a fuckeing wanker and a liera nd a cocksucker he gets a roacket in his ass ever day
2017-11-21 at 10:15 PM UTC
Originally posted by Lanny
I think it will happen and it'll be a good thing. Not because I have any particular faith in tech companies or regulatory authorities but because it's a convenient thing that will make an incremental improvement in the lives of first world citizens i.e. it's the type of technology who people who are involved in making technology actually give a shit about.
When I was in school I took an ethics in sci/tech course and one of the hypotheticals that came up was this: you're in a self driving car going over a bridge. A school bus in front of you full of children hits the breaks, your car has this information and also knows it can't stop in time to avoid the bus. The car has a "choice" to hit the bus likely killing all the kids but deploying airbags and saving your probably or swerving off the bridge almost certainly killing you but keeping the expected death toll low (one person vs. the majority of a full bus). What is joe programmer writing implementing the car's logic supposed to do? I thought the answer was pretty obvious, responsibility to minimize loss of human life far exceeds a company's duty to its customers. It seems pretty uncontroversial that a pharmaceutical company manufacturing like thalidomide for example, knowing the risks and marketing it to pregnant women, is doing something wrong even if its customers understand the consequences. Likewise we shouldn't sell people cars that are going to increase the total deathtoll just to soothe their anxieties (indeed it would even, in aggregate, put such customers at greater risk since they're more likely to be on the other side of that kind of dichotomy). It was surprising how mixed reactions to that case are, a lot of people really believe that there's something wrong with a car that might sacrifice its driver for the greater good.
yeah i'm not paying thousands of dollars for something that will choose to kill me over other people.
besides, a car hitting a bus is unlikely to kill
all the occupants of the bus, maybe 2 or 3 at best. fuck am i an heroing to prevent that. fucking tough shit for getting on that bus that day, that's just how it goes.
.
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
2017-11-22 at 1:32 AM UTC
GM's ceo says it will be illegal to drive a car on public roads by 2035