User Controls
What are you doing at the moment
-
2022-02-23 at 9:54 AM UTC
-
2022-02-23 at 9:57 AM UTC
-
2022-02-23 at 10:02 AM UTCfound the big chga I went after but it had been cut already. I still got 3 more that were 15 feet up the trees. I have a hand chain saw that I tied 20 feet of rope to each side and cut a sapling the right length to put the saw over the chaga knot then cut that fuker off the tree
-
2022-02-23 at 10:06 AM UTC
-
2022-02-23 at 10:18 AM UTCkicking my chef into gear early today so I can get up to my aunts house to put a coat of sheetrock mud on the sheetrock in the closets.
breakfast today is Makenzie bacon, brown eggs and coffee -
2022-02-23 at 10:31 AM UTC
-
2022-02-23 at 10:33 AM UTC
-
2022-02-23 at 10:33 AM UTCWellhung. Why do you hate the world so much?
You didn't get invited to birthday parties much as a kid? -
2022-02-23 at 10:34 AM UTC
-
2022-02-23 at 1:10 PM UTC
Originally posted by Solstice It's definitely subtle as far as discernible effects go but it did seem to have a positive effect on my mood and energy levels. Granted I only tried them for a month because it was a free bottle I got as a sample.
All I'm saying is, cordyceps for example were only "rediscovered" so that Chinese Olympic athletes who test pissing hot as fuck can go "noooo nooo is TRAditionA CHI-knees Medicine maaaashroom". -
2022-02-23 at 1:11 PM UTC
-
2022-02-23 at 1:16 PM UTCJust got home. Ate rice n beans withcilantro n lime juice n soir cream. Kinda drunk, Singing aongs.
Work in 6 hrs.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2022-02-23 at 1:33 PM UTC
Originally posted by aldra my brother's getting garried
I don't really approve of gay marriage, but I can't say that to him
hmm.
My brother was in a long term relationship with a chinaperson who met all my family and it ended because he was cheating on her with another chinaperson who he still sees.
We spent alot of time arguing about her motivations and trustworthiness and I kinda realized I was being a dick, but now that they've broken up and he fucks with a more anglicized chinaperson (who is apparently married to a rich Chinese guy or something) he's gathered alot of Intel on them and talks alot of shit about them with specifics.
I haven't seen the stats on how long gay marriages typically last compared to straight ones but chances are they'll break up and you can talk shit about the whole concept of marriage with him.
I think marriage altogether is fucking gay, what do you see is different about gay marriage? -
2022-02-23 at 1:35 PM UTC
-
2022-02-23 at 1:37 PM UTC
Originally posted by SEGA Nigga Drive All I'm saying is, cordyceps for example were only "rediscovered" so that Chinese Olympic athletes who test pissing hot as fuck can go "noooo nooo is TRAditionA CHI-knees Medicine maaaashroom".
This is completely false. Cordyceps are a whole group of species of fungi that have been consumed for a long ass time in many places other than China -
2022-02-23 at 1:42 PM UTC
-
2022-02-23 at 2:04 PM UTC
Originally posted by SEGA Nigga Drive Why do you disapprove of gay marriage?
Originally posted by Sudo I think marriage altogether is fucking gay, what do you see is different about gay marriage?
just some rough thoughts, not going to go too hard into it in a general thread like this
the social-historical purpose of marriage is to create a permanent, stable relationship to prepare for a family. it's recently been rebranded to be 'all about love', but marriage has no practical effect attached to love; the ceremony doesn't allow you to love someone more or less. if anything, in that regard, it's a self-serving grab for attention.
homosexuals cannot (normally) raise a family, so their primary basis for marriage is null and void.
what worries me more, though, is that even though the institution is no longer entirely practical (not so much due to homosexuals, but more thanks to things like no fault divorce) it retains the implication that marriage = family, and as a result homosexuals seeking to have children becomes more and more common, be it through adoption or surrogacy or whatever else.
There are so many children either up for adoption or in foster care because there are far too many people unfit to be parents, so why would anyone think it makes sense to open parenthood to groups that are statistically far worse? Homosexual men have obscene numbers of sexual partners and as a result, tend to have very unstable relationships. They abuse drugs, commit domestic violence and abuse children at a much higher rate than the rest of the population. Lesbians have similarly unstable relationships and run domestic violence rates at around 7x that of the general population last I checked. -
2022-02-23 at 2:11 PM UTCit's on par with our governments saying 'oh no, birth rates are dropping! better import loads of brown people to keep the population stable'
instead of actually working to improve domestic birth rates -
2022-02-23 at 2:13 PM UTC
-
2022-02-23 at 2:18 PM UTC
Originally posted by aldra just some rough thoughts, not going to go too hard into it in a general thread like this
the social-historical purpose of marriage is to create a permanent, stable relationship to prepare for a family. it's recently been rebranded to be 'all about love', but marriage has no practical effect attached to love; the ceremony doesn't allow you to love someone more or less. if anything, in that regard, it's a self-serving grab for attention.
homosexuals cannot (normally) raise a family, so their primary basis for marriage is null and void.
what worries me more, though, is that even though the institution is no longer entirely practical (not so much due to homosexuals, but more thanks to things like no fault divorce) it retains the implication that marriage = family, and as a result homosexuals seeking to have children becomes more and more common, be it through adoption or surrogacy or whatever else.
There are so many children either up for adoption or in foster care because there are far too many people unfit to be parents, so why would anyone think it makes sense to open parenthood to groups that are statistically far worse? Homosexual men have obscene numbers of sexual partners and as a result, tend to have very unstable relationships. They abuse drugs, commit domestic violence and abuse children at a much higher rate than the rest of the population. Lesbians have similarly unstable relationships and run domestic violence rates at around 7x that of the general population last I checked.
Dude I used to think like this when it comes it comes to gay adoption until I actually looked at the stats and kids are infinitely better off with gay parents than in group homes and foster homes. Nigga look at the stats, I think gay parents is super cringe but it's objectively better for society than being in the care of the state.
You're talking about how you feel homosexuals are degenerate and abuse drugs and have multiple sexual partners LIKE EVERYONE ELSE, because you think they run a higher likelihood of providing a shitty family doesn't disqualify them from adopting. Maybe a more thorough vetting process is a better idea (which it definitely is for all prospective adoptors) and more checks and balances and follow ups.
I know a bit about the adoption system in my country and it's pretty fucking broken but a couple of stable faggots who genuinely want to provide a good life for a kid is hardly the worst thing. Kids in group homes/foster homes are a kagillion times more likely to be abused, strip and on drugs than kids who get made fun of for having two dads.
