User Controls

Convince me mandated "vaccines" don't violate this. Please

  1. #1
    RIPtotse victim of incest [my adversative decurved garbo]
    The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential.

    The experiment should be such as to yield fruitful results for the good of society.

    The experiment should be so designed and based on the results of animal experimentation and a knowledge of the natural history of the disease.

    The experiment should be so conducted as to avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injury.

    No experiment should be conducted where there is an a priori reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur.

    The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment.

    Proper preparations should be made and adequate facilities provided to protect the experimental subject against even remote possibilities of injury, disability, or death.

    The experiment should be conducted only by scientifically qualified persons.

    During the course of the experiment the human subject should be at liberty to bring the experiment to an end.

    During the course of the experiment the scientist in charge must be prepared to terminate the experiment at any stage, if he has probable cause to believe, in the exercise of thegood faith, superior skill and careful judgment required of him that a continuation of the experiment is likely to result in injury, disability, or death to the experimental subject







    Ready?

    Begin!
  2. #2
    aldra JIDF Controlled Opposition
    is that the full text of the nueremburg code

    I've never actually looked it up
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  3. #3
    RIPtotse victim of incest [my adversative decurved garbo]
    On human experimentation.
  4. #4
    You WILL be an experimental Guinea pig.
    You WILL inject anything we decide into your bloodstream.
    You WILL surrender your body to us, the true gods.
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  5. #5
    RIPtotse victim of incest [my adversative decurved garbo]
    CONVINCE ME IM TALK8NG TO YOU STL1 AND TECHNOLOGIST
  6. #6
    If the gov want to experiment on you they can do it a multitude of ways without you knowing about it, in the food/water/air you consume for example....or by just dropping NANOBOTS over your house.
  7. #7
    Sudo Black Hole [my hereto riemannian peach]
    I'm gonna violate your rights so fucking hard then mandate all over your face
  8. #8
    RIPtotse victim of incest [my adversative decurved garbo]
    Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson If the gov want to experiment on you they can do it a multitude of ways without you knowing about it, in the food/water/air you consume for example….or by just dropping NANOBOTS over your house.

    Explain to me why this doesn't violate the first 10 points in my op.
  9. #9
    RIPtotse victim of incest [my adversative decurved garbo]
    Hello? Fuys?
  10. #10
    RIPtotse victim of incest [my adversative decurved garbo]
    And for all your naysayers who will say that the Declaration of Helenski is what the WOH supposedly follows now, explain to me how MNRA vaccine mandates dont break its stipulations.

    Here's your link:

    https://www.wma.net/what-we-do/medical-ethics/declaration-of-helsinki/
  11. #11
    Laws don't mean anything anymore.
  12. #12
    Technologist victim of incest
    Your argument might have some teeth if the vaccine was considered experimental, it simply is not.

    https://www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-covid-vaccines-idUSL1N2M70MW

    Let’s get some facts up in here.
  13. #13
    consent is overrated.

    the value and the valodity of a consent is directky linked to the intelligence of its giver.

    a child may easily give consent to any man who wish to penetrate it with his penis but we know that that consent will be meaningless because the child is considered not mature enough to say yes.

    same goes for a population of adult children in the occupied terri
  14. #14
    Originally posted by Technologist Your argument might have some teeth if the vaccine was considered experimental, it simply is not.

    https://www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-covid-vaccines-idUSL1N2M70MW

    Let’s get some facts up in here.

    vaxxines are supposed to instill beefed up US immune systems.
  15. #15
    RIPtotse victim of incest [my adversative decurved garbo]
    Originally posted by Technologist Your argument might have some teeth if the vaccine was considered experimental, it simply is not.

    https://www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-covid-vaccines-idUSL1N2M70MW

    Let’s get some facts up in here.

    Ok so in your opinion a rushed, never before used, MNRA gene therapy "vaccine", whose literal creator (of the MNRA vaccine delivery system) is banned from Twitter for "misinformation", isn't experimental.

    We can agree to disagree there.
  16. #16
    cigreting Dark Matter
    Originally posted by Technologist Your argument might have some teeth if the vaccine was considered experimental, it simply is not.

    https://www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-covid-vaccines-idUSL1N2M70MW

    Let’s get some facts up in here.

    This post cant be serious
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  17. #17
    Originally posted by Technologist Your argument might have some teeth if the vaccine was considered experimental, it simply is not.

    https://www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-covid-vaccines-idUSL1N2M70MW

    Let’s get some facts up in here.

    Of course it's experimental. It take at least 7 years to complete proper safety studies. Turn off CNN, idiot.
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  18. #18
    Originally posted by ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ Of course it's experimental. It take at least 7 years to complete proper safety studies. Turn off CNN, idiot.

    time is irrelevant...it's the number of vaccinated people that is the best measure.

    30k test people over 7 years...is lesser than 2 billion people in 1 year.
  19. #19
    Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson time is irrelevant…it's the number of vaccinated people that is the best measure.

    30k test people over 7 years…is lesser than 2 billion people in 1 year.

    The one small detail you forgot is that 2 billion people haven't been tested.
  20. #20
    RIPtotse victim of incest [my adversative decurved garbo]
    Testing IS the problem really.
Jump to Top