User Controls

THE MAGA PARTY!,,, the GOP is dead, republicans are going down with the dems,, get ready for THE MAGA PARTY lefty's

  1. "This time we got 'im, folks. We failed miserably 100 times, but this is it, for sure."
  2. mmQ Lisa Turtle
    Originally posted by ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ "This time we got 'im, folks. We failed miserably 100 times, but this is it, for sure."

    Convicting Trump or reinstating him as president?
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  3. Originally posted by mmQ Convicting Trump or reinstating him as president?

    That didn't scare me, kid.
  4. mmQ Lisa Turtle
    Originally posted by ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ That didn't scare me, kid.

    You could've just picked things that won't ever happen for 2000, Ken.
  5. Speedy Parker Black Hole [my absentmindedly lachrymatory gazania]
    Originally posted by ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ Still not a crime.

    This is a crime.

  6. Originally posted by mmQ You could've just picked things that won't ever happen for 2000, Ken.

    You should be able to see that everything is coming to a climax, and that climax is all the frauds and liars and cheats getting their just rewards. Trump will soon be back in the Whitehouse, just as I claimed. Watch and see. Their whole house of cards is crumbling right now, for the world to see for themselves.
  7. mmQ Lisa Turtle
    Okay. I believe you.

    Originally posted by ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ "This time we got 'im, folks. We failed miserably 100 times, but this is it, for sure."
  8. Originally posted by Speedy Parker This is a crime.


    Durham is actually the controlled opposition and working for the Deep State. It won't be him that blows this whole thing wide open.
  9. Originally posted by mmQ Okay. I believe you.

    Not quite. I only made the one promise. The crazies made 100 promises.
  10. mmQ Lisa Turtle
    Originally posted by ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ Not quite. I only made the one promise. The crazies made 100 promises.

    I know, but between you and others I've probably heard it about 100 times all throughout the last year. Last summer was the real hotspot. I thought for SURE he would be reinstated then based off of y'all's confidence. But yes, any day. Just need to finalize the contents of the Germany Box probably and then should be set to go.
  11. Speedy Parker Black Hole [my absentmindedly lachrymatory gazania]
    Originally posted by ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ Durham is actually the controlled opposition and working for the Deep State. It won't be him that blows this whole thing wide open.

    I disagree
  12. Originally posted by Speedy Parker I disagree

    The record already proves he worked for the Deep State. There isn't even a question of that.
  13. POLECAT POLECAT is a motherfucking ferret [my presentably immunised ammonification]
    Originally posted by stl1 Apparently, he was lying about his taxes, wasn't he?

    show me the documents please of shut ur cock sucker commie
  14. The whole reason you hire an accounting firm is to handle the filing of your taxes. If there was any criminality, it would be on the accounting firm, not on Trump.
  15. Sudo Black Hole [my hereto riemannian peach]
    Originally posted by ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ The whole reason you hire an accounting firm is to handle the filing of your taxes. If there was any criminality, it would be on the accounting firm, not on Trump.

    Looks like you have only ever got H and R block to do yours and only ever as an employee. You have to declare certain things and sign alot of things to ensure you are the one who is liable
  16. Originally posted by Sudo Looks like you have only ever got H and R block to do yours and only ever as an employee. You have to declare certain things and sign alot of things to ensure you are the one who is liable

    C'mon, now.
  17. Do you actually expect a multi-billionaire, with hundreds of thousands of transactions per year, to go and double-check everything his accounting firm put together? Sure, he signs it, but that's not attesting to the truthfulness of every entry made in the tax return. The onus is on the tax preparer to take responsibility for the entries it submitted as correct and truthful.
  18. Sudo Black Hole [my hereto riemannian peach]
    Originally posted by ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ The onus is on the tax preparer to take responsibility for the entries it submitted as correct and truthful.

    You've never read the print because you literally sign several times putting the onus on yourself
  19. stl1 Cum Lickin' Fagit
    WE GOT HIM NOW!



    Business Insider
    A judge just handed Trump a major loss in the DC attorney general's lawsuit over inauguration funds as the case heads to trial
    jshamsian@insider.com (Jacob Shamsian)


    A judge reinstated the Trump Organization as a defendant in a lawsuit over the potential misuse of inauguration funds.

    The DC Attorney General alleges the organization wrongly took nonprofit funds from Trump's 2017 inauguration.

    A judge ruled the AG brought enough evidence to keep the company as a defendant.

    A Washington, DC judge reinstated the Trump Organization as a defendant in a lawsuit brought by the district's attorney general over whether former President Donald Trump misused funds for his 2017 inauguration — reversing an earlier decision and handing a major loss to Trump as the case heads to trial.

    DC Attorney General Karl A. Racine filed the civil lawsuit in January 2020. He accused the Trump Organization, the Trump International Hotel in DC, and Trump's 2017 presidential inaugural committee, which is a tax-exempt nonprofit, of using tax-free funds to improperly pay the Trump Organization and members of the Trump family.

    In November, DC Superior Court Judge José M. López cleaved the Trump Organization off the case, ruling that Racine's office didn't bring enough evidence to establish the company may have broken the law.

    Racine filed a motion for reconsideration later that month. On December 31, the case was transferred to a different judge, Yvonne Williams, who ruled Wednesday night that the Trump Organization should remain in the case after all.

    She pointed out in her ruling that Gentry Beach, a man who the attorney general's office says was acting on behalf of the Trump Organization, appeared to conflate the company and the inaugural committee when booking a block of hotel rooms.

    "The contract involved a large block of rooms booked for people affiliated with the Trump Organization at the Loews Madison Hotel during the week of the 2017 Inauguration," Williams wrote. "Mr. Beach signed the contract on behalf of the Trump Organization and listed Lindsay Santoro, Mr. Donald Trump Jr.'s personal assistant, as the point of contact for the rooms."

    Lawyers for the Trump Organization argued that the attorney general's office failed to collect any testimony from Beach. But Williams wrote that López erroneously ruled in their favor without first considering whether Racine should be able to issue a subpoena to depose Beach.

    Racine celebrated the new ruling Wednesday night.

    "Big news: The judge added the Trump Org in NY back into our lawsuit against the Presidential Inaugural Committee," he wrote on Twitter. "Our lawsuit is moving forward fully intact & full steam ahead. We sued the inaugural committee for misusing funds to enrich the Trump family. Now we're going to trial."

    The case is now headed to trial. Stephanie Winston Wolkoff, former First Lady Melania Trump's former close friend, said Monday night that she would be "the lead witness" in the case.

    Wolkoff joined the inauguration committee to help plan it before joining Melania Trump's office in the White House. She left in 2018 following reports that she misused inauguration funds herself, and later published a tell-all book in 2020 that burned bridges with the former first lady.

    Williams wrote in her new ruling that she would hold a conference on Thursday to address discovery motions, at which point she may set a trial date.
  20. Originally posted by stl1 WE GOT HIM NOW!



    Business Insider
    A judge just handed Trump a major loss in the DC attorney general's lawsuit over inauguration funds as the case heads to trial
    jshamsian@insider.com (Jacob Shamsian)


    A judge reinstated the Trump Organization as a defendant in a lawsuit over the potential misuse of inauguration funds.

    The DC Attorney General alleges the organization wrongly took nonprofit funds from Trump's 2017 inauguration.

    A judge ruled the AG brought enough evidence to keep the company as a defendant.

    A Washington, DC judge reinstated the Trump Organization as a defendant in a lawsuit brought by the district's attorney general over whether former President Donald Trump misused funds for his 2017 inauguration — reversing an earlier decision and handing a major loss to Trump as the case heads to trial.

    DC Attorney General Karl A. Racine filed the civil lawsuit in January 2020. He accused the Trump Organization, the Trump International Hotel in DC, and Trump's 2017 presidential inaugural committee, which is a tax-exempt nonprofit, of using tax-free funds to improperly pay the Trump Organization and members of the Trump family.

    In November, DC Superior Court Judge José M. López cleaved the Trump Organization off the case, ruling that Racine's office didn't bring enough evidence to establish the company may have broken the law.

    Racine filed a motion for reconsideration later that month. On December 31, the case was transferred to a different judge, Yvonne Williams, who ruled Wednesday night that the Trump Organization should remain in the case after all.

    She pointed out in her ruling that Gentry Beach, a man who the attorney general's office says was acting on behalf of the Trump Organization, appeared to conflate the company and the inaugural committee when booking a block of hotel rooms.

    "The contract involved a large block of rooms booked for people affiliated with the Trump Organization at the Loews Madison Hotel during the week of the 2017 Inauguration," Williams wrote. "Mr. Beach signed the contract on behalf of the Trump Organization and listed Lindsay Santoro, Mr. Donald Trump Jr.'s personal assistant, as the point of contact for the rooms."

    Lawyers for the Trump Organization argued that the attorney general's office failed to collect any testimony from Beach. But Williams wrote that López erroneously ruled in their favor without first considering whether Racine should be able to issue a subpoena to depose Beach.

    Racine celebrated the new ruling Wednesday night.

    "Big news: The judge added the Trump Org in NY back into our lawsuit against the Presidential Inaugural Committee," he wrote on Twitter. "Our lawsuit is moving forward fully intact & full steam ahead. We sued the inaugural committee for misusing funds to enrich the Trump family. Now we're going to trial."

    The case is now headed to trial. Stephanie Winston Wolkoff, former First Lady Melania Trump's former close friend, said Monday night that she would be "the lead witness" in the case.

    Wolkoff joined the inauguration committee to help plan it before joining Melania Trump's office in the White House. She left in 2018 following reports that she misused inauguration funds herself, and later published a tell-all book in 2020 that burned bridges with the former first lady.

    Williams wrote in her new ruling that she would hold a conference on Thursday to address discovery motions, at which point she may set a trial date.

    You do realize the Trump Organization is a franchise consisting of 250 entities who are using the Trump name, don't you? Trump isn't responsible for the actions of these entities.
Jump to Top