User Controls
Anyone who advocates for a vaccine is
-
2022-01-14 at 6:05 PM UTC"59.6% of the world population has received at least one dose of a COVID-19 vaccine.
9.6 billion doses have been administered globally, and 34.5 million are now administered each day.
Only 9.5% of people in low-income countries have received at least one dose."
...and a few hundred have had cardiac problems?
get the fuck oudda here -
2022-01-14 at 6:14 PM UTC
Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson That's literally MILLIONS of people who would have to be in on "the lie".
Yeah, they openly call it "LOCKSTEP". Where ya been?
https://www.weforum.org/focus/the-great-reset -
2022-01-14 at 6:17 PM UTC
Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson "59.6% of the world population has received at least one dose of a COVID-19 vaccine.
9.6 billion doses have been administered globally, and 34.5 million are now administered each day.
Only 9.5% of people in low-income countries have received at least one dose."
…and a few hundred have had cardiac problems?
get the fuck oudda here
The numbers speak for themselves...
BILLIONS of doses administered...a few people had heart attacks (who probably would have regardless of the vaccine)
Fucking loool, you crazy nuts. -
2022-01-14 at 6:17 PM UTC
Originally posted by ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ Yeah, they openly call it "LOCKSTEP". Where ya been?
https://www.weforum.org/focus/the-great-reset
Oh wow, that a great/credible source
"How the world can ‘reset’ itself after COVID-19 – according to these experts"
Experts say.... -
2022-01-14 at 6:20 PM UTC
-
2022-01-14 at 6:23 PM UTC
Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson Then get your booster…yeah you have to get your flu shot every year too and it's also different every year…
The flu shot is reformulated every year. This shot is just the same one over and over, and the only reason it helps at all is because the shot triggers an immediate immune response that creates a mass of T-cells that fade very quickly. They don't properly target the virus (they only target the spike anyway - it was initially done because they thought the spike wouldn't mutate as fast as the rest of the virus, but lol, OMICRON's spike is almost unrecognisable). Doing this repeatedly has a sort of tolerance effect that degrades your ability to create them naturally.
Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson Um yes it did…even up to a couple of weeks ago local hospital here in Houston was saying 85% of covid patients admitted to Houston hospitals were UNVACCINATED…
https://abc13.com/omicron-variant-houston-covid19-memorial-hermann-unvaccinated/11438514/
One anecdotal example you saw on the news doesn't change the (lack of) correlation, especially without context or grouping information. You were the one who brought up widespread admittance numbers. If you look at Wales' NHS data for example, around 76% of people hospitalised for COVID are 'vaccinated' which corresponds pretty well with their 'fully vaccinated' levels. Places like Gibraltar and israel are even more interesting because they're almost 100% vaccinated (Gibralter's above 100 because they force seasonal workers to get it too).
Wales NHS data
Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson Spike of 100 instead of the usual 2? …out of how many billions vaccinated /eyeroll.
Don't be retarded. There are constant news articles about it, blaming literally everything else.
Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson You've said a lot…but none of it disputes the available information on the vaccine working to protect THE MAJORITY.
You haven't actually done anything to prove that they 'protect the majority', aside from appeal to Mr. Pfizer Man's authority.
I don't need to though, really. The virus isn't serious enough for most people to justify experimental vaccine that hasn't gone through any real testing. If you're at-risk for whatever reason, have at it, but there's no good reason for most people to get it - especially kids, who are statistically much more likely to develop serious complications from the vaccines than they are from COVID. -
2022-01-14 at 6:24 PM UTC
-
2022-01-14 at 6:24 PM UTCWhere are you getting this 'few hundred' number from? Off the top of my head Scotland's reporting a 30-40% rise
-
2022-01-14 at 6:25 PM UTC
Originally posted by aldra The flu shot is reformulated every year. This shot is just the same one over and over, and the only reason it helps at all is because the shot triggers an immediate immune response that creates a mass of T-cells that fade very quickly. They don't properly target the virus (they only target the spike anyway - it was initially done because they thought the spike wouldn't mutate as fast as the rest of the virus, but lol, OMICRON's spike is almost unrecognisable). Doing this repeatedly has a sort of tolerance effect that degrades your ability to create them naturally.
One anecdotal example you saw on the news doesn't change the (lack of) correlation, especially without context or grouping information. You were the one who brought up widespread admittance numbers. If you look at Wales' NHS data for example, around 76% of people hospitalised for COVID are 'vaccinated' which corresponds pretty well with their 'fully vaccinated' levels. Places like Gibraltar and israel are even more interesting because they're almost 100% vaccinated (Gibralter's above 100 because they force seasonal workers to get it too).
Wales NHS data
Don't be retarded. There are constant news articles about it, blaming literally everything else.
You haven't actually done anything to prove that they 'protect the majority', aside from appeal to Mr. Pfizer Man's authority.
I don't need to though, really. The virus isn't serious enough for most people to justify experimental vaccine that hasn't gone through any real testing. If you're at-risk for whatever reason, have at it, but there's no good reason for most people to get it - especially kids, who are statistically much more likely to develop serious complications from the vaccines than they are from COVID.
I'm not reading all that conspiracy nut shit, summarize your lunacy -
2022-01-14 at 6:26 PM UTC
Originally posted by aldra Where are you getting this 'few hundred' number from? Off the top of my head Scotland's reporting a 30-40% rise
30%-40% rise from what??? as usual you're only giving 1/2 the info...
30% of nothing is nothing....30% of 10 is 3...so from 10 to 13?
Fucking lol.
9.3 BILLIOONNNNNN DOSES... -
2022-01-14 at 6:27 PM UTCyes, Scotland now has 13 rather than 10 people being treated in their cardiovascular wards.
-
2022-01-14 at 6:29 PM UTC
Originally posted by aldra …If you're at-risk for whatever reason, have at it, but there's no good reason for most people to get it - especially kids, who are statistically much more likely to develop serious complications from the vaccines than they are from COVID.
Actually, if you're at high risk for infection, that's even MORE reason not to get the jab. A cytokine storm is all it takes to kill such a person, not to mention blood clots and heart attack. Everything they say is a LIE and it's the exact opposite that's true. The ONLY reason they want to get to the elderly, the vulnerable and the sick is because they want to genocide them, and they're very easy targets, and they're very assessable, with little to no witnesses. -
2022-01-14 at 6:32 PM UTC
Originally posted by aldra yes, Scotland now has 13 rather than 10 people being treated in their cardiovascular wards.
Has the rise been for sure directly tied to the vaccine being the cause? cite the report.
Really Aldra, I'd expect better from you with your unqualified percentages and "correlations".
HOW MANY ACTUAL CASES THAT HAVE BEEN 100% TIED TO THE VACCINE??...and then again versus 9.3 BILLION administered doses.
Even if it was 100,000 cases...it's STILL a laughably small number. You've got more chance dying in a car crash driving home tonight...but you'll still drive home right?
Most normal folks go with the majority number...that being half the worlds population have had the vaccine and are not dropping dead or having heart issues.
Paranoia with a side order of conspiracy nuts, it's what's for lunch folks -
2022-01-14 at 6:38 PM UTC
Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson Has the rise been for sure directly tied to the vaccine being the cause? cite the report.
Really Aldra, I'd expect better from you with your unqualified percentages and "correlations".
HOW MANY ACTUAL CASES THAT HAVE BEEN 100% TIED TO THE VACCINE??…and then again versus 9.3 BILLION administered doses.
It doesn't matter. You're stuck on this 100% proof thing but it doesn't matter to the people who end up getting hurt. There was no '100% proof' that thalidomide was a bad idea until long after all those wacky babies.
The correlation is there and almost nobody is willing to investigate it to see if there actually is causation.
I'm not willing to inject DDT because I'm afraid of catching the flu, and if you were sensible you'd feel the same way. -
2022-01-14 at 6:40 PM UTC
-
2022-01-14 at 6:42 PM UTC
-
2022-01-14 at 6:42 PM UTCWhat people need to understand is the root of the problem: that "trusted sources" are no longer to be trusted. What that means is all the numbers, all the data, all the "experts", all the models, are fruit of the poisonous tree. Once the credibility is gone, you can't just continue on handing them credibility by default. They've already openly admitted they lied about the masks, but it was a "noble lie", they said, because they "wanted to safeguard the mask supply for professional use", then they openly admitted they lied about, and suppressed, the comorbidities data and people who died with covid verses people who died of covid, but only out of "an abundance of caution", of course. They also now openly admit they lied for over a year about the actual efficacy their jabs offer, now stating they offer "little to no protection" (Pfizer CEO / Jan12/2022). They also now openly admit the virus probably did come from the Wuhan lab, but for two years they had been calling holders of such opinions "kooks" and "tin foil hat conspiracy theorists". Those are just a few examples of the fact they now have ZERO CREDIBILITY (by their own admission). So making judgments off data coming from people with NO CREDIBILITY is a fool's errand, at best, willful and deliberate dishonesty, at worst.
-
2022-01-14 at 6:43 PM UTC
Originally posted by ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ What people need to understand is the root of the problem: that "trusted sources" are no longer to be trusted. What that means is all the numbers, all the data, all the "experts", all the models, are fruit of the poisonous tree. Once the credibility is gone, you can't just continue on handing them credibility by default. They've already openly admitted they lied about the masks, but it was a "noble lie", they said, because they "wanted to safeguard the mask supply for professional use", then they openly admitted they lied about, and suppressed, the comorbidities data and people who died with covid verses people who died of covid, but only out of "an abundance of caution", of course. They also now openly admit they lied for over a year about the actual efficacy their jabs offer, now stating they offer "little to no protection" (Pfizer CEO / Jan12/2022). They also now openly admit the virus probably did come from the Wuhan lab, but for two years they had been calling holders of such opinions "kooks" and "tin foil hat conspiracy theorists". Those are just a few examples of the fact they now have ZERO CREDIBILITY (by their own admission). So making judgments off data coming from people with NO CREDIBILITY is a fool's errand, at best, willful and deliberate dishonesty, at worst.
Once the credibility is gone they can be easily trusted and used to know the actual truth. -
2022-01-14 at 6:43 PM UTC
-
2022-01-14 at 6:44 PM UTCI only made the claim that there is a lot of correlation that needs to be further investigated before it can be ruled as safe.
A medical treatment is not innocent until proven guilty, it needs to be tested to demonstrate its safety... And that phase was bypassed almost entirely.
You sound like you're trying madly to convince yourself you didn't take a heartstopper shot
