2017-04-18 at 7:56 PM UTC
On second thought, that last remark seems like a cop out without giving actual comments on where "in the middle" the truth lies, as the spectrum is quite broad between the two extremes.
I was recently talking to a friend of mine who is both a professor of sociology and political science at the University of Strasbourg and also a practicing sociologist and political scientist. Studying the immigration and welfare situation in the European Union is literally his day job, this is not some fuckboys on the internet throwing out stats from Imright.com and articles from Rebel Media/InfoWars or MotherJones/Jezebel. This is an actual expert, and rather than being a faggy know it all, I just shut my mouth asked questions and listened.
I could go into some lengthy specifics but the basic gist of his analysis was that Europe needs immigrants, it is simply the economic reality of the whole European Union project, if it wants to hold together economically over the next 20-40 years they just simply need immigrants. But you can't just patch that hole for free, like you let immigrants in and ezpz problem solved. What Europe has mainly fucked up hardcore is dealing with the immigrants it is taking in, specially at the rate it is taking in.
The direct comparison he actually gave was to immigrants in the US, which is something I hadn't thought of; we actually have amazing statistics and real world situations with regards to immigrants being integrated into American society. In Europe, immigrants basically form cultural ghettos due to poor integration and turn into areas with high unemployment rates, which spirals into high crime rates, which leads to unrest etc. In the US, people don't really form cultural ghettos; areas like Chicago's Devon, New York's Chinatown, San Francisco's Japantown are simply ethnic enclaves that are extremely well rooted in their surrounding areas, with little to no cultural isolation.
Europe has dealt with its immigrants and refugees in the worst possible ways; they have promoted the development of cultural ghettos, given new immigrants absolutely no tools to use to integrate well into their societies or cultures, and have generally created hostility by not actually following up on that initial step of "let these people into our borders". As a result, they have been assfucked by their own failures and overeagerness.
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
2017-04-18 at 8:43 PM UTC
Originally posted by Captain Falcon
On second thought, that last remark seems like a cop out without giving actual comments on where "in the middle" the truth lies, as the spectrum is quite broad between the two extremes.
I was recently talking to a friend of mine who is both a professor of sociology and political science at the University of Strasbourg and also a practicing sociologist and political scientist. Studying the immigration and welfare situation in the European Union is literally his day job, this is not some fuckboys on the internet throwing out stats from Imright.com and articles from Rebel Media/InfoWars or MotherJones/Jezebel. This is an actual expert, and rather than being a faggy know it all, I just shut my mouth asked questions and listened.
I could go into some lengthy specifics but the basic gist of his analysis was that Europe needs immigrants, it is simply the economic reality of the whole European Union project, if it wants to hold together economically over the next 20-40 years they just simply need immigrants. But you can't just patch that hole for free, like you let immigrants in and ezpz problem solved. What Europe has mainly fucked up hardcore is dealing with the immigrants it is taking in, specially at the rate it is taking in.
The direct comparison he actually gave was to immigrants in the US, which is something I hadn't thought of; we actually have amazing statistics and real world situations with regards to immigrants being integrated into American society. In Europe, immigrants basically form cultural ghettos due to poor integration and turn into areas with high unemployment rates, which spirals into high crime rates, which leads to unrest etc. In the US, people don't really form cultural ghettos; areas like Chicago's Devon, New York's Chinatown, San Francisco's Japantown are simply ethnic enclaves that are extremely well rooted in their surrounding areas, with little to no cultural isolation.
Europe has dealt with its immigrants and refugees in the worst possible ways; they have promoted the development of cultural ghettos, given new immigrants absolutely no tools to use to integrate well into their societies or cultures, and have generally created hostility by not actually following up on that initial step of "let these people into our borders". As a result, they have been assfucked by their own failures and overeagerness.
If that's true I'll find your entire PI within 10 minutes. I'd edit that post.
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
2017-04-18 at 8:54 PM UTC
How the fuck would you find my PI from that lol
2017-04-18 at 8:58 PM UTC
Professional tip: prolific and important people meet thousand of people.
Also, I have no connection to the university of Strasbourg itself. I met him while he was giving a talk in New York.
2017-04-18 at 9:30 PM UTC
mix ground up glass wif grease
2017-04-18 at 9:32 PM UTC
Which is why I wasn't afraid to mention him.
2017-04-18 at 9:48 PM UTC
kroz
weak whyte, frothy cuck, and former twink
sounds like a false flag to me
