User Controls

Why did Spectral get demodded?

  1. Originally posted by Bradley Do we have mods on this site? I can tell

    Lala made Lanny a moderator when she took over NIS
  2. I resigned, due to Metaphysicist reinstating known Totse traitors I banned. I've never been fired from anything in my entire life.
  3. Speedy Parker Black Hole [my absentmindedly lachrymatory gazania]
    Originally posted by ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ I resigned, due to Metaphysicist reinstating known Totse traitors I banned. I've never been fired from anything in my entire life.

    Did these Totste traitors break an oath they took?
  4. Originally posted by Speedy Parker Did these Totste traitors break an oath they took?

    No, they just stank up the place.
  5. Speedy Parker Black Hole [my absentmindedly lachrymatory gazania]
    Originally posted by ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ No, they just stank up the place.

    If one of them never had an account on Totse were they still a Totse traitor? If so doesn't that mean that anyone in the world who doesn't follow the ideals of Totse as you see them is a Totse traitor? If so you have a lot of work ahead of you.
  6. Sophie Pedophile Tech Support
    I think Spectral feels that if you signed up for Totse it was implied you agreed with it's founding principles. If you don't conform to those principals as Spectral sees them you are a Totse traitor. Feels like he has a special disdain for anyone imposing order and/or authority on that ideal community in a way he disagrees with. He also dislikes kidiots, it's a peculiar brand of elitism Spectral used to hold to.

    I guess that comes from his history as phreaker, which is something i can get behind. But modern hacking and programming is something unfathomable to him. Even when he has all the time in the world to actually git gud.

    Anyway, he always forgets to mention that i had to helped Mizled reversing his 30k bans by Lanny.


    Looking back on M&A/A&A and all that drama, something definitely was toxic. I'd mainly blame apathy in case of section mods, that and in-fighting. Also, the admins should have reigned me in if i was causing actual problems. Half of the section mods didn't like me either IIRC, but tough luck because i could moderate normal mods too lmao.

    In any case, i'm glad the only 'staff' here is Lanny.
  7. Lanny gave me 30,000 consecutive bans.
  8. Sophie Pedophile Tech Support
    Originally posted by ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ Lanny gave me 30,000 consecutive bans.

    30k Infraction points with a little javascript script.
  9. Originally posted by Sophie 30k Infraction points with a little javascript script.

    It said something like "you have been banned until the year 2550".
  10. Sophie Pedophile Tech Support
    Originally posted by ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ It said something like "you have been banned until the year 2550".

    I forgot the details, but generally you could only set ban dates longer than the infraction system gave through the Mod CP. But Lanny's script outpaced Zoklet, kind of like how people could give a gazillion thanks at some point. I think the fundamental issue that allowed that to happen was the one used by Lon Lon to pull off the 30k infraction point thing.
  11. All that and I didn't miss out on a single day of posting, and poor Lanny ended up to be the one permabanned and couldn't post. I had high hopes for the kid.
  12. Sophie Pedophile Tech Support
    Originally posted by ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ All that and I didn't miss out on a single day of posting, and poor Lanny ended up to be the one permabanned and couldn't post. I had high hopes for the kid.

    For all the brouhaha about you and your talk of mod power abuse, even if M&A and 'the fun bunch' didn't want to we had to ban Lanny. I gave him 5 points and told him to stop, the infraction was so he'd actually cut it out, one of the admins axed his account.

    If the play was to make it politically expedient for M&A to ban Lanny, by forcing us to enforce the rules equally or being seen as obvious hypocrites than that would have been impressive, like for real. No matter how much i've come around to you being you though, that's a way too high level a play for you to come up with on your own if it indeed was by design and not by happenstance.
  13. Originally posted by Sophie For all the brouhaha about you and your talk of mod power abuse, even if M&A and 'the fun bunch' didn't want to we had to ban Lanny. I gave him 5 points and told him to stop, the infraction was so he'd actually cut it out, one of the admins axed his account.

    If the play was to make it politically expedient for M&A to ban Lanny, by forcing us to enforce the rules equally or being seen as obvious hypocrites than that would have been impressive, like for real. No matter how much i've come around to you being you though, that's a way too high level a play for you to come up with on your own if it indeed was by design and not by happenstance.

    It was a "double whammy". Otherwise known as poetic justice. Who bans someone just because they don't agree or like their opinion anyways?
  14. Sophie Pedophile Tech Support
    Originally posted by ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ It was a "double whammy". Otherwise known as poetic justice. Who bans someone just because they don't agree or like their opinion anyways?

    I guess i did ban Sudo that one time because he did a backflip straight into my face, metaphorically speaking, it was pretty embarrassing. Can't even remember which forum Lanny used to mod. And you know what, i'm not sure i even care anymore.
  15. Originally posted by Sophie …And you know what, i'm not sure i even care anymore.

    Sacrilege.
  16. Speedy Parker Black Hole [my absentmindedly lachrymatory gazania]
    Originally posted by ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ Who bans someone just because they don't agree or like their opinion anyways?

    SpectraL at TDD for one
  17. Originally posted by Speedy Parker SpectraL at TDD for one

    It wasn't because I disagreed with their opinion. It was because I disagreed with their actions.
  18. Speedy Parker Black Hole [my absentmindedly lachrymatory gazania]
    Originally posted by ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ It wasn't because I disagreed with their opinion. It was because I disagreed with their actions.

    Their actions on TDD were well within all rules.
  19. Originally posted by Speedy Parker Their actions on TDD were well within all rules.

    It wasn't about actions on TDD.
  20. Speedy Parker Black Hole [my absentmindedly lachrymatory gazania]
    Originally posted by ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ It wasn't about actions on TDD.

    So you didn't approve of actions that were taken outside of your sphere of authority.
Jump to Top