User Controls
In Poland, may sex with a 14 y/o be justified by gypsy tradition?
-
2021-12-20 at 10:23 AM UTCI think this article may be of interest to Wariat: https://bezprawnik.pl/seks-z-czternastolatka/
cause it pretty much explains, how - in spite of the age of consent in Poland being 15 - an adult Romani man has avoided punishment for fuarking a girl under this age.
The judge highlighted, that the guy simply isn't able to assimilate to Polish cultural norms (as, for example, he doesn't know Polish), and that his Roma community, as well as his country of origin, simply accepts such cases. -
2021-12-20 at 11:14 AM UTC14 is the perfect age for aoc or a good age. I wish all of europe would follow Italy and Bulgaria's examples.
-
2021-12-20 at 12:11 PM UTC
Originally posted by Szaleniec I think this article may be of interest to Wariat: https://bezprawnik.pl/seks-z-czternastolatka/
cause it pretty much explains, how - in spite of the age of consent in Poland being 15 - an adult Romani man has avoided punishment for fuarking a girl under this age.
The judge highlighted, that the guy simply isn't able to assimilate to Polish cultural norms (as, for example, he doesn't know Polish), and that his Roma community, as well as his country of origin, simply accepts such cases. -
2021-12-20 at 1:04 PM UTC
Originally posted by Szaleniec I think this article may be of interest to Wariat: https://bezprawnik.pl/seks-z-czternastolatka/
cause it pretty much explains, how - in spite of the age of consent in Poland being 15 - an adult Romani man has avoided punishment for fuarking a girl under this age.
The judge highlighted, that the guy simply isn't able to assimilate to Polish cultural norms (as, for example, he doesn't know Polish), and that his Roma community, as well as his country of origin, simply accepts such cases.
This is dangerous, as it is basically asserting that cultural norms are more important than what the law is.
I don't feel like a judge has the right to just ignore the law because he's feeling edgy and nietzchean.
Laws are there to enforce the will of the majority, for good or ill.
What happens when the majority are wrong? Well that's complicated. But you don't get to just say "nah, law doesn't matter in this case".The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2021-12-20 at 1:06 PM UTCAlso who paid for this literal gypsy's legal defence?
-
2021-12-23 at 5:46 PM UTC
Originally posted by Donald Trump This is dangerous, as it is basically asserting that cultural norms are more important than what the law is.
I don't feel like a judge has the right to just ignore the law because he's feeling edgy and nietzchean.
Laws are there to enforce the will of the majority, for good or ill.
What happens when the majority are wrong? Well that's complicated. But you don't get to just say "nah, law doesn't matter in this case".
shit like that happens with muslims all the time, there was a such a pedo ring the britfag government refused to investigate because they were afraid DAS RAYSIS, im guessing this is also the case with gypsies throughout europe.
one standard for civilized folk, another one for brown folk because they are too retarded to know better.
