User Controls
Why is vagina more valuable than penis?
-
2021-08-03 at 12:22 PM UTCThey stink and women are weak. To be fair I’m circumcised so idk what male smegma smells like. But I would imagine uncircumcised dicks don’t smell as bad as pussies. So why is vagina more valuable? Is it just the fact that a woman carries a baby for 9 months and does the work? It wouldn’t seem so because you can still pimp one out after her tubes are tied.
A guy can take advantage of women too but a female has a way to make money between her legs. -
2021-08-03 at 12:52 PM UTCbecause you only need one penis to repopulate a village with 100 vaginas, you cant do the same with one vagina and 100 penises.
this is why for all history the cunt has been put on a pedestal. this white knighting is a natural instinct, it was preservation of our species.
as for circumcision, just take a fucking shower, not difficult is it?The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2021-08-03 at 12:58 PM UTC
Originally posted by Kev because you only need one penis to repopulate a village with 100 vaginas, you cant do the same with one vagina and 100 penises.
this is why for all history the cunt has been put on a pedestal. this white knighting is a natural instinct, it was preservation of our species.
as for circumcision, just take a fucking shower, not difficult is it?
What if you don't care about re-population...then it's value is no more than a cock. -
2021-08-03 at 1:45 PM UTC
Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson What if you don't care about re-population…then it's value is no more than a cock.
if you dont value your existence, you stop existing. simple as that. you exist because our fathers white knighted for the holy uterus that shat us into existence.
for 99.99% of history the status quo was the opposite of overpopulation and the best way to continue our species was to protect the cunt and keep it pregnant. -
2021-08-03 at 2:22 PM UTC
Originally posted by Kev because you only need one penis to repopulate a village with 100 vaginas, you cant do the same with one vagina and 100 penises.
wouldn’t this mean the penis was more valuable? It goes back to the woman having to carry the child though. While the man could keep making babies.as for circumcision, just take a fucking shower, not difficult is it?
That’s the same thing women say about their pussies. You make me reconsider male smegma not being that bad. -
2021-08-03 at 2:38 PM UTCsmegma has a sweet and piss-sour smell to it
when i was a toddler i use to let it build up so much it acted as cement and i couldnt pull my foreskin back -
2021-08-03 at 2:43 PM UTC
Originally posted by Cowboy2013 wouldn’t this mean the penis was more valuable? It goes back to the woman having to carry the child though. While the man could keep making babies.
when you need less of something, it means it is less value. a shortage of penises wont affect the repopulation of a tribe because one man can impregnante many women, but one woman can only produce one or two children every year. undervaluing the vagina would mean the extinction of the human race.That’s the same thing women say about their pussies. You make me reconsider male smegma not being that bad.
the point was that if you shower every day, you wont get smegma.
women worship their own cunts, of course theyll consider anyone implying their cunt smells a heretic. its literally the only thing that gives their existence any meaningful value.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2021-08-03 at 3:35 PM UTC
Originally posted by Kev if you dont value your existence, you stop existing. simple as that.
Non sequitur, not wishing to help populate the Earth has absolutely nothing to do with your own existence.
Again, the question is "What if you don't care about re-population"?
Lots of people choose not to have children...as they themselves already exist there existence isn't affected by that choice/decision. -
2021-08-03 at 3:38 PM UTCI'll help you out, the reason VJ is more valuable that cock is simply because cock is more readily available.
A woman can walk into a bar and shout, "who wants to fuck me" and she will get multiple choices, she'll be able to pick and choose who she fucks...she has the "power" in that senario.
A man walks into a bar and shouts "who wants to fuck me" he'll either get kicked out, laughed at or be approached by several faggots for some cock on cock action.
He does not have the power of choice, the power of choice is always with the vagina...the cock takes it where he can get it. -
2021-08-03 at 3:50 PM UTC
-
2021-08-03 at 3:53 PM UTCIn theory they should be equally as valuable since there's about the same amount of each in the world. The value comes from the rarity or scarcity; I dont think you can objectively say one has more value than the other.
-
2021-08-03 at 4:02 PM UTC
Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson Non sequitur, not wishing to help populate the Earth has absolutely nothing to do with your own existence.
the reason you exist is because your parents desired to preserve their species.Again, the question is "What if you don't care about re-population"?
Lots of people choose not to have children…as they themselves already exist there existence isn't affected by that choice/decision.
your individual existence is inconsequential in the grand scheme of things. so are all your choices. -
2021-08-03 at 4:07 PM UTC
Originally posted by mmQ In theory they should be equally as valuable since there's about the same amount of each in the world. The value comes from the rarity or scarcity; I dont think you can objectively say one has more value than the other.
we can objectively say that, because the existence of our species depends on many cunts but only needs one cock.
a cunt takes 9 months to deliver, a cock takes only a minute to fertilize it. -
2021-08-03 at 4:10 PM UTC
Originally posted by Kev the reason you exist is because your parents desired to preserve their species.
your individual existence is inconsequential in the grand scheme of things. so are all your choices.
I think his point is is that if you don't want to have kids, that doesn't mean that you somehow no longer exist yourself.
Idk even though everything seems to have a premise of reproduction, I don't think that that still has to mean that reproducing is 'the point of life' or whatever.
I think its obviously a big part of it but also, say.. if every new human and animal that was born from now on out no longer had the ability to reproduce, it would be fine.
I'm pretty sure our ability to reproduce, and the way we have to do it, is just circumstantial anyway. If it were so important you'd think we would've evolved the process by now to make it way easier and a much quicker process. -
2021-08-03 at 4:14 PM UTC
Originally posted by Kev we can objectively say that, because the existence of our species depends on many cunts but only needs one cock.
a cunt takes 9 months to deliver, a cock takes only a minute to fertilize it.
In that sense sure but you're still basing that on the notion that reproduction itself is objectively the main function of the two and not just a secondary function behind say.. the primary function of simply being used to obtain sexual pleasure.) -
2021-08-03 at 4:15 PM UTCcomplexity and workmanship.
you can use any fruits, stationeries, household products, healthcare products almost anything as satisfactory substitute for penis but you cant just use anything as fleshlight.
you need specialized materials and design. -
2021-08-03 at 4:18 PM UTC
Originally posted by Cowboy2013 They stink and women are weak. To be fair I’m circumcised so idk what male smegma smells like. But I would imagine uncircumcised dicks don’t smell as bad as pussies. So why is vagina more valuable? Is it just the fact that a woman carries a baby for 9 months and does the work? It wouldn’t seem so because you can still pimp one out after her tubes are tied.
A guy can take advantage of women too but a female has a way to make money between her legs.
In the west we have a lot of male immigrants which skews the mating market. For instance Sweden has a higher male:female ratio than China, which had sex selective abortions and infanticide for a very long time. OTOH females tend to stay at home. In places where the immigrants come from men are scarce. In places like the west, women are scarce. In addition females tend to gravitate towards cities. Demographics fucks things up more than you would expect. -
2021-08-03 at 4:21 PM UTC
Originally posted by mmQ I think his point is is that if you don't want to have kids, that doesn't mean that you somehow no longer exist yourself.
he has no concept of anything outside himself, so unless a large portion of the population thought like him, he doesnt matter.Idk even though everything seems to have a premise of reproduction, I don't think that that still has to mean that reproducing is 'the point of life' or whatever.
well not per se, the point of life is to increase the numbers of those who look like us. less reproduction coupled with more investment in the offspring for example outcompetes a species with mass reproduction that neglects or devours its own offspring.
99.9% of ants and honeybees never reproduce and spend all their lives raising someone elses children.
but no matter which way you wanna do it, the cunt will have to be valued and protected. it will always boil down to gynocentrism and male disposability. no matter the species, the female will always be fucking spoiled because she is the key to the continuation of the species.I think its obviously a big part of it but also, say.. if every new human and animal that was born from now on out no longer had the ability to reproduce, it would be fine.
how would it be fine? the earth would fucking die.I'm pretty sure our ability to reproduce, and the way we have to do it, is just circumstantial anyway. If it were so important you'd think we would've evolved the process by now to make it way easier and a much quicker process.
youre in luck, artificial wombs are on their way. -
2021-08-03 at 4:22 PM UTC
Originally posted by mmQ In that sense sure but you're still basing that on the notion that reproduction itself is objectively the main function of the two and not just a secondary function behind say.. the primary function of simply being used to obtain sexual pleasure.)
you got it backwards, sexual pleasure exists to encourage you to procreate in the first place. -
2021-08-03 at 4:26 PM UTCWhy doesn't the earth itself have thr ability to reproduce with other planets to make more planets like ours filled with smaller things that are also supposed to reproduce ?
