Mass shooting at Fedex facility

1. 2021-04-16 at 5:57 PM UTC

   #21
   

   ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ Black Hole

   Originally posted by cigreting Ya but dont you know making guns harder to get will automatically mean less shootings because criminals cant get guns that way

   
   They won't be harder to get for the criminals. They can get them just fine. Shootings won't diminish. The only thing that changes is who gets shot. Instead of the criminal who gets shot, it's the home owner.
2. 2021-04-16 at 5:58 PM UTC

   #22
   

   Jiggaboo_Johnson Black Hole

   Originally posted by vindicktive vinny for how much ?

   
   $14 or something like that
3. 2021-04-16 at 5:59 PM UTC

   #23
   

   Jiggaboo_Johnson Black Hole

   Originally posted by cigreting Ya but dont you know making guns harder to get will automatically mean less shootings because criminals cant get guns that way

   
   Harder to get for law abiding citizens...I can still drive downtown and pick one up for $50 or less.
4. 2021-04-16 at 7:15 PM UTC

   #24
   

   cigreting Dark Matter

   Originally posted by ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ They won't be harder to get for the criminals. They can get them just fine. Shootings won't diminish. The only thing that changes is who gets shot. Instead of the criminal who gets shot, it's the home owner.

   
   Im fucking kidding. Criminals steal the guns they commit crimes with
5. 2021-04-16 at 7:33 PM UTC

   #25
   

   Jiggaboo_Johnson Black Hole
   95% of illegal guns were once legal guns that were stolen from the legal owners in home invasions, robberies etc...the other 5% are illegally imported.
   
   Doing background checks at gunshows isn't going to change any of that...dummmm fucking demmmms
6. 2021-04-16 at 9:04 PM UTC

   #26
   

   POLECAT POLECAT is a motherfucking ferret [my presentably immunised ammonification]
   paque paque paque
7. 2021-04-16 at 9:11 PM UTC

   #27
   

   vindicktive vinny Black Hole

   Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson $14 or something like that

   
   thats cheap. i was thinking of using that as replacement for my bike batteries since it has 3 times more mAh at 1/3 the price.
8. 2021-04-16 at 9:13 PM UTC

   #28
   

   vindicktive vinny Black Hole

   Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson 95% of illegal guns were once legal guns that were stolen from the legal owners in home invasions, robberies etc…

   
   yes, so by cutting down on the numbers of legal guns they can cut down the numbers of illegal guns indirectly.
9. 2021-04-16 at 10:43 PM UTC

   #29
   

   Bradley Florida Man
   now with a 3d printer their gun control measures will due less and less
10. 2021-04-16 at 10:45 PM UTC

    #30
    

    cigreting Dark Matter

    Originally posted by Bradley now with a 3d printer their gun control measures will due less and less

    
    Thats true
11. 2021-04-16 at 10:50 PM UTC

    #31
    

    Quick Mix Ready Dark Matter [jealously defalcate my upanishad]
    3D Guns Im told are shit. you can use them one time and they shatter apart. the curing on this fucking this is a mother fucker. shit feels like sticky rubber.
    
    maybe the non resin ones are hard enough for the trigger (hammer?) or firing pin to work. but recoil i would think would vibrate the shit to pieces.
    
    Fuck guns. guns are crazy instruments of murking. but the logic is if you ban guns you might as well ban hunting knives and big trucks or cars in general. Hell you can kill someone with a 1200cc bike a lot easier because you can drive it through the road barriers a lot easier than a moving truck. a 1200cc weighs like 900 pounds. put a large steal plate and front like a snow plow, and ram into people at 100 mph throwing them off the side of you and into a wall would kill shitloads of people in a crowed.
    
    so banning guns is a bandaide on the cancer of cancerous people willing to murder others. it is shit tier logic.
12. 2021-04-17 at 2:18 AM UTC

    #32
    

    ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ Black Hole

    Originally posted by vindicktive vinny yes, so by cutting down on the numbers of legal guns they can cut down the numbers of illegal guns indirectly.

    
    Not true. The States with the strictest gun laws have the most number of shootings.
13. 2021-04-17 at 2:55 AM UTC

    #33
    

    Bradley Florida Man
    It's like banning foods high in fat or calories or the sizing of soda in new york city, i'm not sure if people think it's gonna help but if someone wants to be a fat slug looking motherfucker, having to buy three sodas or 1 of each candy bar cuz there's limit, isn't gonna change shit.
    
    Get rid of children too cuz they grow up into people who do stuff and it might be bad later.
14. 2021-04-17 at 3:55 AM UTC

    #34
    

    Data African Astronaut
    Was an ex employee. Really fucked up. Why would you not just shoot your boss or higher ups? Why go for your co-workers. What a shit bag. Doesn't seem targeted at all either. Idk why you would just shoot up your work and not have it be personal in some way. Go after whoever pissed you off at least?
    
    Its like these shooters never think it through. The only terrorist in recent history who did it right imo was the dude who blew himself up in his van on xmas. Went right for damaging telecom offices (I think Comcast or AT&T?) and tried to avoid hurting people. Very targeted attack and not just senseless killing. Even the capitol hill insurrectionists went straight for the jugular.
15. 2021-04-17 at 2:08 PM UTC

    #35
    

    vindicktive vinny Black Hole

    Originally posted by ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ Not true. The States with the strictest gun laws have the most number of shootings.

    
    they have the strictest gun laws due tk the high number of shootings.
16. 2021-04-19 at 1:39 PM UTC

    #36
    

    Jiggaboo_Johnson Black Hole

    Originally posted by vindicktive vinny yes, so by cutting down on the numbers of legal guns they can cut down the numbers of illegal guns indirectly.

    
    Only problem with that is there are already over 400 million guns in circulation...doing background checks now isn't going to "lower" anything.
17. 2021-04-19 at 1:41 PM UTC

    #37
    

    Data African Astronaut

    Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson Only problem with that is there are already over 400 million guns in circulation…doing background checks now isn't going to "lower" anything.

    
    Uh yes it is lmao. It works great in states with actual gun control. 85% of guns siezed in Chicago come from Indiana.
18. 2021-04-19 at 1:41 PM UTC

    #38
    

    vindicktive vinny Black Hole

    Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson Only problem with that is there are already over 400 million guns in circulation…doing background checks now isn't going to "lower" anything.

    
    so your suggesting the cohen act ?
19. 2021-04-19 at 1:43 PM UTC

    #39
    

    Jiggaboo_Johnson Black Hole

    Originally posted by vindicktive vinny so your suggesting the cohen act ?

    
    I'm suggesting as far as lowering gun crime it's a worthless "for show" effort.
20. 2021-04-19 at 1:47 PM UTC

    #40
    

    vindicktive vinny Black Hole

    Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson I'm suggesting as far as lowering gun crime it's a worthless "for show" effort.

    
    yes, and having authorities going house-to-house and seizing guns will be more effective.