User Controls
retards who don't understand science make fun of others for not understanding science
-
2021-02-26 at 4:56 AM UTCedited for privacyThe following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2021-02-26 at 5:20 AM UTCThey are highly experimental. They are basically literally using the populations as human guinea pigs for profit. These so-called "vaccines" aren't even really vaccines. They are machines, which manipulate and change the dynamic structures of your DNA and cells. There have already been almost a thousand deaths reported on the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) for anyone to look at for themselves right now, it's public information readily available from the website, including thousands of injuries, all occurring immediately, or just days or weeks, following the so-called COVID-19 injection, the vast majority of them previously healthy people.
-
2021-02-26 at 5:35 AM UTCthe new COVID vaccines, all three types, are so different from traditional vaccines that some doctors don't even think they should be called that
-
2021-02-26 at 5:35 AM UTC
Originally posted by netstat 'haha those conservative rednecks don't understand science shows vaccines are safe, they're so stupid and i'm very smart and scientifically literate'
okay so can you explain the mechanisms through which vaccines work, how they're made and tested and verified to be safe?
'absolutely not, i'm just a retard who parrots what the talking heads on the TV tell me to believe and say, i barely even remember what a cell is from high school biology, i really just want to feel smug and smart and signal to my ingroup while feeling superior to my outgroup'
yeah that's what i figured
The butthurt reeks from this regressive.
Newsflash: acknowledging science isn't a political opinion. You're just retarded. This has nothing to do with conservatives and everything to do with retards like you who believe in wild conspiracy theories
Hurrdurr im so smart big bad joo
I have evidence of my beliefs. You don't. -
2021-02-26 at 5:36 AM UTCThe following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2021-02-26 at 5:37 AM UTC
-
2021-02-26 at 5:39 AM UTC
Originally posted by aldra science is a method, not an authority to appeal to
Yeah... And the science showing the vaccines are safe and effective is solid. The johnson and johnson one that just got approved by the FDA had no deaths and no hospitalizations.
Even if it has side effects its better than mystropic degradation from COVID -
2021-02-26 at 5:48 AM UTC
Originally posted by Antifa Member Yeah… And the science showing the vaccines are safe and effective is solid. The johnson and johnson one that just got approved by the FDA had no deaths and no hospitalizations.
so far - I just looked it up and it's similar to the SPUTNIK and MODERNA vaccines in that it uses components of COVID DNA bound to an adenovirus. which carries the (admittedly low) risk of triggering autoimmune disorders.
these COVID vaccines have been fast-tracked and have not only gone through minimal testing, but are a completely new paradigm of immunity-building. like introducing a jet to market but calling it a car so that regulations and existing data only partially cover it.Even if it has side effects its better than mystropic degradation from COVID
I dunno, I think I'd prefer coof to AIDS -
2021-02-26 at 6:17 AM UTCFunny how some people actually think if they just say "conspiracy theory", that's all they have to do. Like some kind of magical incantation they think changes the facts.
-
2021-02-26 at 6:21 AM UTC
Originally posted by aldra so far - I just looked it up and it's similar to the SPUTNIK and MODERNA vaccines in that it uses components of COVID DNA bound to an adenovirus. which carries the (admittedly low) risk of triggering autoimmune disorders.
these COVID vaccines have been fast-tracked and have not only gone through minimal testing, but are a completely new paradigm of immunity-building. like introducing a jet to market but calling it a car so that regulations and existing data only partially cover it.
I dunno, I think I'd prefer coof to AIDS
When they engineered SARS-CoV-2 in the Wuhan laboratory, they used HIV-like components to build the virus. -
2021-02-26 at 6:39 AM UTCI'm not totally convinced it originated in Wuhan; they never found a patient zero and there are several samples of a similar strain collected in Europe long before the outbreak
-
2021-02-26 at 7 AM UTCAnd Fauci's patents are related to engineered HIV mechanisms. What a coincidence.
-
2021-02-26 at 7:20 AM UTC
Originally posted by aldra so far - I just looked it up and it's similar to the SPUTNIK and MODERNA vaccines in that it uses components of COVID DNA bound to an adenovirus. which carries the (admittedly low) risk of triggering autoimmune disorders.
these COVID vaccines have been fast-tracked and have not only gone through minimal testing, but are a completely new paradigm of immunity-building. like introducing a jet to market but calling it a car so that regulations and existing data only partially cover it.
I dunno, I think I'd prefer coof to AIDS
They've had just as much trials as any other FDA approved drug. They didn't get fast tracked. They had the red tape removed. The trials were just as thorough and up to standard.
Otherwise these drugs existed back in spring and could've been out much much sooner.
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2034577
Like, is 43,000 test subjects not enough for you? What part of the study do you think was fast tracked? What do you think the study is missing? Are you a virologist? -
2021-02-26 at 7:21 AM UTC
Originally posted by ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ And Fauci's patents are related to engineered HIV mechanisms. What a coincidence.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/mobile.reuters.com/article/amp/idUSKBN29C26E
Inb4 Soros -
2021-02-26 at 7:49 AM UTCThere was no studies. And the only study that matters anyways is the Gold Standard double-blind placebo studies, and they certainly haven't completed any of those. They haven't even officially isolated the virus yet, according to official FOIA responses, so it's impossible for them to have come up with a vaccine for a virus they haven't even isolated yet. They had this dangerous garbage for profit already in hand and all ready to go even before COVID-19 arrived.
-
2021-02-26 at 8:20 AM UTCThe following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2021-02-26 at 12:48 PM UTCCan you explain the way your plumbing works or do you just trust a guy with credentials proving he does understand it, to fix your pipes? Can you explain how an aircraft's stabilizing gyro works? Can you still trust aircraft.
OP's post is idiotic.
The idiot who thinks their plumber's license is a Zionist conspiracy is definitely far dumber than someone who doesn't know how to do plumbing but trusts a plumber for good reason. -
2021-02-26 at 12:50 PM UTC
Originally posted by Meikai Your "beliefs", eh? At least you're finally talking about it in terms of faith and religion. This is an improvement. I approve.
Another deliberately low IQ take.
Knowledge = justified true belief. Just because someone uses the word "belief" doesn't mean it's a matter of faith.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2021-02-26 at 1:08 PM UTC
Originally posted by Solomon Thunder Knowledge = justified true belief.
Speaking of deliberately low IQ takes... what makes a belief "justified"? According to scientific thought, it is empirical evidence. You will note, of course, that "a study purporting to contain the observations of others" is not "empirical evidence" - it is, if it is to be believed, secondhand. Unless you repeat an experiment, your belief in the results of an experiment someone else has performed cannot be said to be "justified" within an empirical context.
And by "true belief", do you mean "belief based in truth" or the "unwavering faith of a true believer"? If the former, "truth" must first be known to claim your belief is based in it. You can see how defining knowledge as "belief based in knowledge of what is true" is somewhat tautological, yes? If the latter, it has no place in a discussion of knowledge: if something is known, faith (unwavering or otherwise) is not required.
Tut tut. Your plebeian takes bore me. -
2021-02-26 at 1:10 PM UTCThis covid shit is weird as fuck. I have thoughts on this stuff but don't want to share them. Just hope that things go back to "normal" after. whatever.
