User Controls
What's up with the widespread anti-incel rhetoric here?
-
2021-02-06 at 9:20 PM UTCYou tried to have sex with a child you are the lowest of the low.
-
2021-02-06 at 9:23 PM UTC...
-
2021-02-06 at 9:25 PM UTChow can you even compare anyone who in your books “tries” something or anything to actual offenders or female boxers?
-
2021-02-06 at 9:29 PM UTCNo no no, pedo scum
-
2021-02-06 at 10:08 PM UTC
Originally posted by Kev its a simple question, did you consent to have a misandrist political system meddle with your personal life? if not, you are an incel.
Yeah, you mentioned that. But you're wrong.
Originally posted by Kev nobody is voluntarily celibate.
You may find it hard to believe but some people actually are, and there is also certain psychological benefits to it. Not only does it teach you to postpone gratification but it also empowers you with energy and drive, and this matters even more in the society we currently live in.
I've even done it myself some years ago, and i also made a post about it here somewhere.
Originally posted by Kev if you choose to suppress your natural urge to procreate, that is pressure imposed upon you externally by a sick sociopolitical system.
You can't say that man, not only because its incorrect but also because of the implications. Where does it end then? If you resist any of your "natural urges" it is because society forces you to it? Dude, nobody holds you on gunpoint telling you not to pass gass, nobody is holding you on gunpoint saying you can't have sex either. You can choose. Don't blame society on your lack of confidence, although society is partly at blame for alot of the shit thats going on but thats for another talk.
But basically you're saying there's no free will, and that society controls your every move and that you have no say in it because its already determined.
That is fine argument for a determinist, but we won't reach consensus if you're going that route.
Originally posted by Wariat youre a femal boxer. a wife beater. a scum. scum of the lowest order.
And you base these assumptions on what? -
2021-02-06 at 11:16 PM UTC
-
2021-02-07 at 6:10 AM UTC
-
2021-02-07 at 7:35 AM UTC
Originally posted by Xlite Yeah, you mentioned that. But you're wrong.
You may find it hard to believe but some people actually are, and there is also certain psychological benefits to it. Not only does it teach you to postpone gratification but it also empowers you with energy and drive, and this matters even more in the society we currently live in.
I've even done it myself some years ago, and i also made a post about it here somewhere.
You can't say that man, not only because its incorrect but also because of the implications. Where does it end then? If you resist any of your "natural urges" it is because society forces you to it? Dude, nobody holds you on gunpoint telling you not to pass gass, nobody is holding you on gunpoint saying you can't have sex either. You can choose. Don't blame society on your lack of confidence, although society is partly at blame for alot of the shit thats going on but thats for another talk.
But basically you're saying there's no free will, and that society controls your every move and that you have no say in it because its already determined.
That is fine argument for a determinist, but we won't reach consensus if you're going that route.
And you base these assumptions on what?
Firstly, a lot of you people claiming to be “volcel” are simply coping, pretending you could get laid if you tried when in fact, you probably couldn’t. At least not with a woman who isn’t a fat cow.
Secondly, if you actually are refusing sex when you have the option to have sex, why are you doing it?
Well, you are doing it because the quality of the women is so low, and the risks and potential consequences of sexual activity so high, that it simply isn’t worth it.
So then the question becomes: did you volunteer to be a part of a feminist society, where women are all fat, aggressive, nasty, dirty, lying whores who might accuse you of rape in the short term, get you done up on domestic violence in the medium term or divorce-rape you in the long term?
Unless you did volunteer for this situation – and you didn’t – then you aren’t “voluntarily celibate” because of a situation you have no control over. A situation that was forced on you. A situation you are involuntarily living in.
Thus: you are an incel.
Unless you are:
A priest or a monk, abstaining for spiritual reasons
A married man with children
A “boyfriend” (or a husband in a childless marriage), i.e., some bitch’s puppy dog
A reckless retard who spends extreme amounts of vital essence and masculine energy attempting to have sex with rando sluts, and willing to take all the risks that go along with that practice, and are actually successful at it (which is rare and getting rarer)
You have extremely low standards and are willing to have sex with women who are fat, nonwhite or past the age of 25
Then you are an incel.But basically you're saying there's no free will
not for you, remind us again what happened to you for 2 years the last time you were in a relationship. without this threat, which was the norm until only a few decades ago, would you be exercising your natural will freely? -
2021-02-07 at 7:50 AM UTCwho the fuck is reading that shit you garbage ass pedophile?
-
2021-02-07 at 8:01 AM UTC
Originally posted by Kev Firstly, a lot of you people claiming to be “volcel” are simply coping, pretending you could get laid if you tried when in fact, you probably couldn’t. At least not with a woman who isn’t a fat cow.
Secondly, if you actually are refusing sex when you have the option to have sex, why are you doing it?
Well, you are doing it because the quality of the women is so low, and the risks and potential consequences of sexual activity so high, that it simply isn’t worth it.
So then the question becomes: did you volunteer to be a part of a feminist society, where women are all fat, aggressive, nasty, dirty, lying whores who might accuse you of rape in the short term, get you done up on domestic violence in the medium term or divorce-rape you in the long term?
Unless you did volunteer for this situation – and you didn’t – then you aren’t “voluntarily celibate” because of a situation you have no control over. A situation that was forced on you. A situation you are involuntarily living in.
Thus: you are an incel.
Unless you are:
A priest or a monk, abstaining for spiritual reasons
A married man with children
A “boyfriend” (or a husband in a childless marriage), i.e., some bitch’s puppy dog
A reckless retard who spends extreme amounts of vital essence and masculine energy attempting to have sex with rando sluts, and willing to take all the risks that go along with that practice, and are actually successful at it (which is rare and getting rarer)
You have extremely low standards and are willing to have sex with women who are fat, nonwhite or past the age of 25
Then you are an incel.
not for you, remind us again what happened to you for 2 years the last time you were in a relationship. without this threat, which was the norm until only a few decades ago, would you be exercising your natural will freely?
Stupid fucking Nonce.
Didn't read -
2021-02-07 at 8:03 AM UTC
-
2021-02-07 at 11:47 AM UTC
Originally posted by Kev Unless you are:
A priest or a monk, abstaining for spiritual reasons
A married man with children
A “boyfriend” (or a husband in a childless marriage), i.e., some bitch’s puppy dog
A reckless retard who spends extreme amounts of vital essence and masculine energy attempting to have sex with rando sluts, and willing to take all the risks that go along with that practice, and are actually successful at it (which is rare and getting rarer)
You have extremely low standards and are willing to have sex with women who are fat, nonwhite or past the age of 25
So now that its convenient there are exceptions? That was my entire point in the first place: you can't say everyone is incels.
I was afraid you would begin to argue that becoming a priest or getting married, or being reckless is actually forced down upon us at gunpoint by society but you didn't take it that far for some reason, though that is what your earlier statements suggests.
You need to lay of the drugs man because there are no continuity in what you're saying. You're also saying that if we could, everyone would have sex all the time which is also false, its simply not practical. Your dick would fall off, you would starve, thirst, and shit the bed and probably kill yourself. People can say no to sex because they are not feeling it. Now, i realize you might not be able to say no but just because you can't, it doesn't mean everyone can't.
I can agree though, that society is trying to impose itself on individuals but it was never at gunpoint, you always have a choice.
But currently there are bigger issues, such as infringement of free speech and the failure to openly discuss such topics as islam without having to worry about getting killed, diversity and its demons, equality and why men and women cannot be equal, women's rise to power and subsequently men's fall, -
2021-02-07 at 12:02 PM UTChy the hell would you or anyone want someone to nag you every morning to get up and look for work?
-
2021-02-07 at 12:03 PM UTC
-
2021-02-07 at 12:03 PM UTC„ People can say no to sex because they are not feeling it. ”
try saying that to pesky travels and she will call you prison gay, put you down, use your story against you of doing time and talk shit to you in your own pad while naked. -
2021-02-07 at 12:09 PM UTCnigger?
-
2021-02-07 at 12:12 PM UTC
-
2021-02-07 at 12:12 PM UTCNigga?
-
2021-02-07 at 12:14 PM UTCwhat would you do kick her out naked or show her ur not prison gay?
-
2021-02-07 at 12:14 PM UTC
Originally posted by Wariat „ People can say no to sex because they are not feeling it. ”
try saying that to pesky travels and she will call you prison gay, put you down, use your story against you of doing time and talk shit to you in your own pad while naked.
She cuck you good, what an embarrassment to all males.