2021-02-04 at 5:24 PM UTC
Still crying about Trump 4 years later LMAO xDDDDD
2021-02-04 at 5:29 PM UTC
Originally posted by stl1
Yeah, you can't believe an organization with deep pockets unwilling to print something that would get a legal judgement against them and their money that has full time paid and probably with a college degree investigative reporters and nationwide followings over some tater head with a mullet and a Confederate flag license plate on his 25 year old F-150 pulling his ideas out of his ass or so stupid and gullible that he follows a reality TV star buffoon.
Edit to add: Do you mean CORPORATE NEWS rather than cooperate news?
Americans just assume that their leaders will act in their best interests.
Because why?
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
2021-02-04 at 6:09 PM UTC
Becausev if they don't, they lose the next election by SEVEN MILLION VOTES.
duh
2021-02-04 at 6:28 PM UTC
And...they get impeached...TWICE!
2021-02-04 at 11:10 PM UTC
WASHINGTON (AP) — House Democrats on Thursday asked Donald Trump to testify under oath for his Senate impeachment trial, saying the former president must explain why he and his lawyers have disputed key factual allegations at the center of the case.
The request from House impeachment managers make clear their intent to present an aggressive case against the former president even though he has left the White House. A Trump adviser did not immediately return a message seeking comment about the managers’ letter.
The Senate impeachment trial starts Feb. 9. Trump is charged with inciting a mob of supporters that stormed the Capitol on Jan. 6.
In the letter, Rep Jamie Raskin, one of the impeachment managers, asked that Trump provide testimony “either before or during the Senate impeachment trial,” and under cross examination, about his conduct on Jan. 6, as early as Monday and not later than next Thursday, Feb. 11.
Raskin said that Trump questioned critical facts in the case “notwithstanding the clear and overwhelming evidence of your constitutional offense.”
“In light of your disputing these factual allegations, I write to invite you to provide testimony under oath, either before or during the Senate impeachment trial, concerning your conduct on January 6, 2021,” Raskin wrote.
Raskin wrote that if Trump refuses to testify, the managers will use his refusal against him in the trial – a similar argument put forth by House Democrats in last year’s impeachment trial, when many Trump officials ignored subpoenas.
“Indeed, whereas a sitting president might raise concerns about distraction from their official duties, that concern is obviously inapplicable here,” Raskin wrote.
Associated Press
Published 4 February 2021
2021-02-04 at 11:17 PM UTC
POLECAT
POLECAT is a motherfucking ferret
[my presentably immunised ammonification]
didnt read,, TRUMP WON, u niggers just don't know it yet
2021-02-05 at 2:30 PM UTC
POLECAT
POLECAT is a motherfucking ferret
[my presentably immunised ammonification]
TRUMP is the 45th president,, TRUMP is the 19th president,, Joe is the fraudulent 46 runner for the 46 th position of president.
I'm white and I'm right ,, don't be a dumb nigger
2021-02-05 at 2:33 PM UTC
POLECAT
POLECAT is a motherfucking ferret
[my presentably immunised ammonification]
its kinda interesting that Kerry had to use his own jet to go get an award for climate change.
Have any of you seen Joe or anyone from the 46th presidentcee use air force one or any government airplanes ??
2021-02-05 at 10:12 PM UTC
POLECAT
POLECAT is a motherfucking ferret
[my presentably immunised ammonification]
um, did you catch the time magazine article that came out today?? it would seem they have found some evidence proving voter fraud
2021-02-05 at 10:26 PM UTC
POLECAT
POLECAT is a motherfucking ferret
[my presentably immunised ammonification]
naw, I aint got time to educate the commies about it,, u go find it or I kin go so far as to post a salty cracker video about it if you want
2021-02-06 at 1:22 AM UTC
POLECAT
POLECAT is a motherfucking ferret
[my presentably immunised ammonification]
well folks I was right all along when I was sayin Time will tell,, I honestly didn't think it would be the magazine but I'll take it for the win
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
2021-02-06 at 1:59 AM UTC
They just couldn't not brag about it.
And why not?
What they did was quite an achievement.
While the right was waiting for Q and their secret walls and secret corporations and for the space force to land and arrest their enemies and hand them their day the jedis were hard at work making contacts, forming networks, agreeing deals, and deciding outcomes.
Who won? Who deserved to win?
