User Controls
How can two gay people be 'married'?
-
2021-01-28 at 4:24 PM UTC
Originally posted by jfakldjfkdaljfalkdfjlkad Yeah, it's always been there. Homosexuality is 100% natural. Just look at bonobo orgies. Literally every intelligent mammal on Earth has been found engaging in homosexuality.
The frogs turning gay thing is especially retarded (as is anyone who listens to Alex Jones) because frogs literally fuck everything. They will fuck sticks. They will fuck the ground. They will fuck water. When it's mating season they literally hump anything and everything. What's disgusting too is sometimes they cum on sticks and dirt and stuff. Not a lot of documentaries will tell you that, but they do, and it's disgusting.
100 percent , pure love.
Coming back to the middle and around again
I'm gonna a be here til the end
Now I Am Gonna compare homosexuality to pedophilia.
To also anything else.
Born with it..
Born Into This -Bukowski
Could you imagine being born and you just love the thought of fucking kids, just the same as a person loves the thought of getting married to a person of the opposite sex and having babbys?
I hate thinking about this but I think about it sometimes.
Brain.
One.
You have it.
Not your choice.
I mean that's why anyone does anything.
I know what I'm saying but I'm certainly not being eloquent about it. -
2021-01-28 at 7:09 PM UTCI would read that if it was in a paragraph but you stretched it like Marmite
no fucking thanks -
2021-01-28 at 7:23 PM UTC
Originally posted by Lanny Why do you think the standard deduction exists? Or tax brackets? Or SSI? Because yes, at some level, as an obvious result of political pressure, the vast tax codes of western countries exist not only to extract money from the populace but also to make that extraction more palpable and to not over tax populations that can’t bare a given tax burden.
I mean what exactly is your explanation? The shadowy counsel of tax villains gathered and decided we needed more babies so let’s trick people into getting married with a tax break? To what end? I mean if you need like at most a couple thousand dollars in a tax refund to have a child, if that’s what stands between you and parenthood, then that kid that the tax code just created is probably going to cost the state more in social welfare programs than it’s ever going bring in in the form of taxes.
Aaand, if this is your explanation, how the fuck do you think that delegitimizes gay marriage?
My basic premise is that every decision a government makes is self-serving. There's no shadowy council of tax villains deciding "we need more babies", just a general understanding that population growth mean more taxpayers, and is also required for the mythical "infinite economic growth" sought by western capitalist countries. As such, tax policies evolved over the years in part to encourage population growth. I include the tax benefits of marriage in this, because of the ways in which they benefit the homemaker-breadwinner household that we understand to be the core of the traditional nuclear family (which is at the heart of stable population growth).
This delegitimizes gay marriage when we accept the premise that "marriage is just for taxes, nothing else, so we should just let the fags marry". As fags can't have children, the government recognizing their marriages serves no purpose and giving them tax breaks and legal standing commensurate with straight couples (breeding pairs) is pointless.
I am very smart. 🧐
-
2021-01-28 at 7:53 PM UTCBeing gay is cool, only faggots aren't gay
-
2021-01-28 at 7:57 PM UTCIm personally grateful to feminists and their pet faggots for fucking up this morally bankrupt institution that never benefited men but subjugated them to a useless materialistic whore who repaid his servitude by bitching about how hard her life is because she has to wash dishes.
marry your waifu, niggas. better yet, marry yourself, become "self partnered". get with the flow, this is clown world now. -
2021-01-28 at 7:58 PM UTC
Originally posted by Kev Im personally grateful to feminists and their pet faggots for fucking up this morally bankrupt institution that never benefited men but subjugated them to a useless materialistic whore who repaid his servitude by bitching about how hard her life is because she has to wash dishes.
marry your waifu, niggas. better yet, marry yourself, become "self partnered". get with the flow, this is clown world now.
garbage fucking pedo piece of shit ^ -
2021-01-28 at 8 PM UTC
-
2021-01-28 at 8:26 PM UTC
Originally posted by rabbitweed I mean sure they can imitate a marriage ceremony. That bit's easy.
But I don't understand. A groom and a groom? A bride and bride? Makes as much sense as marrying a cat and a dog.
Anyway I for one welcome our progressive overlords pushing animal marriage in the coming decades. I will be a proud bestiaphobe until the end.
idk man, the institute of marriage doesn't hold much importance to me so I don't really care, I grew up in a generation with a 50% divorce rate and my group of friends growing up all had divorced parents.
I don't know how beastiality is easier for you to grasp than two people of the same gender being married. I guess it's more normal for people in your country to marry sheep
-
2021-01-28 at 11:17 PM UTC
Originally posted by mmQ But yes, hes catholic. Or, his question is posed from that belief system. I dont fucking know.
Thinking a marriage should be based around a fruitful union is hardly unique to catholicism.
The past 5 years are a very, very tiny slice of time, don't over-emphasize its importance or universalism.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2021-01-29 at 5:44 AM UTC
Originally posted by Obbe Nothing is stopping them now that gay marriage is legal, at least here. Why would the sexual orientation of the individuals involved be important to anyone?
Marriage doesn't need to be legal to throw an elaborate cockspinning viagra ceremony. Literally the only thing that changed is the government agreed to give them a piece of paper afterward. Nothing was stopping them before it was made legal. Marriage is a legal and religious institution meant to promote the stable growth of families, and since fags can't make babies it shouldn't include them. Duh. -
2021-01-29 at 5:59 AM UTC
Originally posted by rabbitweed Thinking a marriage should be based around a fruitful union is hardly unique to catholicism.
The past 5 years are a very, very tiny slice of time, don't over-emphasize its importance or universalism.
Its unique to something. Obviously when YOU think of marriage, you think of procreation.
I personally have never thought of marriage that way.
We should probably just ask some random toddlers.
2 people in love. Married. -
2021-01-29 at 6:02 AM UTC
Originally posted by mmQ Its unique to something. Obviously when YOU think of marriage, you think of procreation.
I personally have never thought of marriage that way.
We should probably just ask some random toddlers.
2 people in love. Married.
it's the traditional purpose of marriage; why it was enshrined as a social institution in the first place. without it there's no meaning or purpose behind it; sure it'll get you a tax break but that was always to support the founding of a family - a bonus, not a reason for marriage. without the possibility of starting a family there's no justification for that tax break.
why would you ask a toddler anything -
2021-01-29 at 6:04 AM UTCthe only argument I see here is "marriage doesn't mean anything anymore just go with it"
okThe following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2021-01-29 at 6:44 AM UTC
Originally posted by aldra it's the traditional purpose of marriage; why it was enshrined as a social institution in the first place. without it there's no meaning or purpose behind it; sure it'll get you a tax break but that was always to support the founding of a family - a bonus, not a reason for marriage. without the possibility of starting a family there's no justification for that tax break.
why would you ask a toddler anything
Because kids are brutally honest.
I'm just saying, I've never thought of marriage as a means to procreate. That feels like a strictly religious thing. Saving yourself for marriage, or whatever. It's a man made concept.
Again as has been stated, plenty of people get married and dont have kids, even when they're able to.
I've never heard anyone say "we cant have kids until we're married" without some religious connotation behind it. -
2021-01-29 at 12:51 PM UTC
-
2021-01-29 at 7:33 PM UTC
Originally posted by Joseph R. Biden Jr, 46th President of the United States of America That's because you are all fucking retarded and can't grasp the fact that words only have meaning insofar as they are useful, not a metaphysical meaning prescribed by god.
You are a liberal and therefore a Satan worshipper so anything you have to say doesn't even matter LOL. -
2021-01-29 at 7:48 PM UTC
Originally posted by mmQ I've never heard anyone say "we cant have kids until we're married" without some religious connotation behind it.
heres a non religious connotation: producing an army of rootless rejects fucks up society as a whole. marriage encourages the preservation of the nuclear family which is necessary for stability, religion backs that institution up.
but it is beyond the point of no return right now. -
2021-01-29 at 8:05 PM UTC
-
2021-01-30 at 12:04 AM UTC
-
2021-01-30 at 12:07 AM UTC
Originally posted by Meikai Marriage is a legal and religious institution meant to promote the stable growth of families, and since fags can't make babies it shouldn't include them.
Good thing for those fags that your impotent opinions on what marriage means and what other people should or shouldn't do can't stop them from getting married.
