User Controls
lol the first time since 1814 has the u.sl capital been invaded in a coup attempt
-
2021-01-09 at 4:24 PM UTCHe's permabanned and all alternatives have been shut down too. Next step is for ISP's to block access to *chans and any website with Trump supporters just like New Zealand did with the mass shootie.
https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2019/03/australian-and-nz-isps-blocked-dozens-of-sites-that-host-nz-shooting-video/
If people don't like it they can just make their own social media and ISP's that don't ass fuck you. I would pay extra to know my ISP is being run by a bunch of nazis except they would probably just do what twitter does and ban people from any website with trannies or niggers and the only thing you could use the internet for is listening to shitty metal and posting nigger memes.
Everyone should be their own ISP and run fiddy wires to and from their building connecting to their neighbors and build a network by the people for the people free of centralization like a block chain but for bandwidth
-
2021-01-09 at 4:25 PM UTC
-
2021-01-09 at 4:29 PM UTC
Originally posted by Sudo Thats very hyperbolic and untrue. Donald Trump can say whatever he wants, whenever he wants, however he wants to say it, as he has tended to due. A company has the freedon to decide whether or not they carry it. It sets a terrible precedent to say a company or individual is forced to carry the message of a shitty lame duck president (or a throbbing vigorous one) simply because when they are a service the president partakes in they lose the ability to make their own choices of free enterprise. Fuck that maoist shit. Tech companies are terribly run with terrible objectives because they are given the freedom to do so. What kind of authoritarian shit is forcing a podium?
It's not a perfect example of your evil and seditious statement because its a company deciding it doesn't want to be part of an increasingly irrelevant individual's intent to sow discord among the populace. It's entirely understandable. As much as I enjoy laughing at trump tweets there is absolutely nothing wrong with banning him for 2 weeks
by your logic a company such as dominion should also be free to count the votes and tally them anyway they want, to all their whims and fancies.
they shall have the right to refuse counting votes that go against their company policies or whatever.
your a leetart. -
2021-01-09 at 4:33 PM UTC
Originally posted by vindicktive vinny by your logic a company such as dominion should also be free to count the votes and tally them anyway they want, to all their whims and fancies.
they shall have the right to refuse counting votes that go against their company policies or whatever.
your a leetart.
No, they have to follow election laws because they are government contractors. There are no laws for social media which was the whole deal with the hearings last year in october
https://www.newscentermaine.com/article/news/nation-world/facebook-twitter-ceos-facing-questions-on-election-measures/507-114b3929-b040-45b0-a0a4-67309b628dc4 -
2021-01-09 at 4:44 PM UTC
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2021-01-09 at 4:46 PM UTC
-
2021-01-09 at 4:47 PM UTCYes and then the national brotherhood of cake baker unions blocks the roads to all bakeries selling gay cakes and prevents people from taking their business elsewhere by force.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2021-01-09 at 4:48 PM UTC
-
2021-01-09 at 4:49 PM UTCObbe is a sycophant of John Smith.
-
2021-01-09 at 4:56 PM UTC
Originally posted by Sudo Thats very hyperbolic and untrue. Donald Trump can say whatever he wants, whenever he wants, however he wants to say it, as he has tended to due. A company has the freedon to decide whether or not they carry it. It sets a terrible precedent to say a company or individual is forced to carry the message of a shitty lame duck president (or a throbbing vigorous one) simply because when they are a service the president partakes in they lose the ability to make their own choices of free enterprise. Fuck that maoist shit. Tech companies are terribly run with terrible objectives because they are given the freedom to do so. What kind of authoritarian shit is forcing a podium?
These handful of companies enjoy a near-monopoly on communication, largely due to government interference in the market. In terms of the first amendment, this makes them the equivalent of the 'town square' where freedom of speech applies in the same sense that freedom of speech still applies if a company buys up all the public areas of a town.
The fact that the government has not only funded them through outfits like Al'phabet but selectively applied the law to their cartel to their benefit, (specifically - protections relating to the distinction between publisher and platform) makes it super hilarious that they're using their 'untouchable' position to undermine their elected president.
Not only is Trump being blacklisted or banned on major social media platforms and services hosted by the few major tech companies, they're actively colluding to deplatform him from anywhere outside of their control, as evidenced by both Google and Apple removing Parler's app on the basis that they won't moderate wrongthink. Ironically enough, since they officially claim to be platforms, they are legally required to only censor blatantly illegal content and are doing the wrong thing by censoring opinions that aren't direct calls to action.
Originally posted by Sudo It's not a perfect example of your evil and seditious statement because its a company deciding it doesn't want to be part of an increasingly irrelevant individual's intent to sow discord among the populace. It's entirely understandable. As much as I enjoy laughing at trump tweets there is absolutely nothing wrong with banning him for 2 weeks
The core idea behind capitalism is that the free market remains free because all entrants have equal opportunity; monopoly shouldn't happen because a company that grows too large becomes inefficient and is usurped by newcomers that are able to offer similar products or services at more reasonable price.
In a capitalist state the economic power is parallel to political power and they're meant to be kept separate because the purpose of a government is to serve the interests of the people, whether they're profitable or not. Because there's no fundamental law keeping these two structures apart, they'll always end up intertwined. Economic power leaks into the political system which, through regulation, changes the rules of the market in a way that's beneficial to the 'investor'.
What we're seeing here is government interference in the market creating a cartel that is, in effect able to dictate to the government. Can it end any other way? -
2021-01-09 at 4:58 PM UTC
-
2021-01-09 at 4:58 PM UTCI used to be banned from twitter many times and all it took was anna spysz complaining and me inciting no violence or threat of violence but simply quesrioning her educstion and way she got a job while changing her career from a wannabe tech writer or journalist to a software programmer out of the blue at a whim after a single gootcamp course with no uni degree. thats all it took folks is me quesrioning her and her wlmighty wueenhood of polish immigrants in the u.s. thats all it took folks is me questioning her and her wlmighty wueenhood of polish immigrants in the u.s. and twitter should be a platform that would allow me to questiom people or their savyness in getting positions or jobs over those more wualified based only on gender diversity tactics by u.s. firms but her never wdmitting its the reason shes not in the same place as me right now with her career. I am arguably a much better tech writer than she ever was and journalist and a designer while she shouldnt even include thst on her webpage saying she even does gay porn without a single sample folks.
-
2021-01-09 at 4:58 PM UTCLess government, more big bux. Imagine bidding wars on what laws get passed, oh man that would be wild.
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2021-01-09 at 5 PM UTC
-
2021-01-09 at 5:05 PM UTC
Originally posted by Wariat I used to be banned from twitter many times and all it took was anna spysz complaining and me inciting no violence or threat of violence but simply quesrioning her educstion and way she got a job while changing her career from a wannabe tech writer or journalist to a software programmer out of the blue at a whim after a single gootcamp course with no uni degree. thats all it took folks is me quesrioning her and her wlmighty wueenhood of polish immigrants in the u.s. thats all it took folks is me questioning her and her wlmighty wueenhood of polish immigrants in the u.s. and twitter should be a platform that would allow me to questiom people or their savyness in getting positions or jobs over those more wualified based only on gender diversity tactics by u.s. firms but her never wdmitting its the reason shes not in the same place as me right now with her career. I am arguably a much better tech writer than she ever was and journalist and a designer while she shouldnt even include thst on her webpage saying she even does gay porn without a single sample folks.
Maybe cause you have a history of stalking, harassing her you fucking nonce. -
2021-01-09 at 5:07 PM UTCThis is allowed on twitter but Trump is bad orange man for being too sore of a loser.
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2021-01-09 at 5:13 PM UTCTwitter doesn't have to let Trump use their platform lolz he's still free to say what he wants nobody is stopping him
-
2021-01-09 at 5:17 PM UTC
-
2021-01-09 at 5:34 PM UTC
Originally posted by Robert Mugabe Maybe cause you have a history of stalking, harassing her you fucking nonce.
criticising someones work or skills or them putting outrageous shit on their site like them having pretty good design skills they want to charge people for without whowing a single sample or them claiming to charge startups 50 dollars an hour for analyst fees withiut any wuqlifications and being even worse tech writers than me isnt stalking. its just the truth some people can or cannot swallow I guess. There is nothing in any of her careers or portfolios thwt impresses me wnd i simply came to an understanding she was a fraud but how is that stalking by telling it what it is? stalking would be trying to get in her perspnal life I give two shits about or trying to find her info and shit which is exactly ehat some of you guys do. me i just simply told her how i felt or other people about her work and how i dont buy her supposed skills. stalking is what you did by finding somehow i dont know how my other profiles on rpgwatch and other forums. she uses her full name on twitter wnd its a public forum so how is me criticising her work or qualifications as stalking? -
2021-01-09 at 5:35 PM UTC
Originally posted by larrylegend8383 Twitter doesn't have to let Trump use their platform lolz he's still free to say what he wants nobody is stopping him
He is literally banned from everywhere on the internet and all alternative sites are being shut down as well. Nobody is stopping him except for the entirety of big tek and social media.
he could go on TV or radio but they could tell him to fuck off too.
WELL HE SHOULD JUST PRINT HIS OWN NEWSPAPER HE HAS THE MONEY LOL WHATS THE PROBLEM FREE SPEECH JUST MAKE YOUR OWN TWITTER XD
