User Controls
No Evidence Of Voter Fraud
-
2020-12-02 at 10:15 PM UTC
Originally posted by infinityshock lovingly allowed lard-ass lanny the luxury of lapping the loins-leviathan while the little lad larps as a laotian ladyboy lapdancer---.0101110--1-1-----10.-110.1011-----...-.1.0-1-.1010-10--01-011------.-.1-------.-1----000011---(banned) pucker up, buttercup, the ride is about to get bumpy.
id suggest a mouth guard…but your mouth is already full.
At least half of all Americans do not and will not accept this fraudulent election because of the eyewitness testimony, and the material, statistical and mathematical evidence of OVERWHELMING fraud. The other half will not accept the outcome if the courts see the evidence of fraud and rightfully overturn the election! The Left has literally been planning riots just for that occasion for months. We the People must not and WILL NOT cede our exclusive Constitutional right to elect our Representatives to judges, lawyers, courts, Governors, Secretary’s of State, Congress, corrupt election officials and local politicians, the corrupt media - or Leftist threats of violence! It is OUR EXCLUSIVE RIGHT to decide our Representatives not theirs! Therefore, We the People MUST demand a NEW and fair national vote, a vote that all Americans can trust and live by regardless of the winner! Without a fair vote, we fear, with good reason, the threat of a shooting civil war is imminent. Gun sales are at an all time high and 40% are first time gun owners looking to defend themselves, their property, and their rights. Therefore, Mr. President you must act now before there is no peaceful way left to preserve our Union.
Bro President Broseph is going to be sworn in and you will do nothing but post dumb shit on the interwebz like you already do.
Maayyybbbee go march in the street like the pussy hats did. Dats bout it, faggot. -
2020-12-02 at 10:19 PM UTC
Originally posted by aldra media paints distrust in election results as a niche 'conspiracy theory' but polling indicates that around 40% of all voters believe there was significant enough fraud to affect the outcome. even 40% or so of Democrat voters believe there was serious fraud but not at a scale great enough to affect the outcome.
why do you think Q was considered a serious enough threat to be censored across social media?
Because most of the key people and investors in social media appear to be left wing, so they would want to censor something that supports what they oppose on their platforms.
The whole thing is fucked if you ask me, but the Right has been carving it's own avenues in social media lately so, ya know, yay free market economy. -
2020-12-02 at 10:33 PM UTC
Originally posted by street_carp Because most of the key people and investors in social media appear to be left wing, so they would want to censor something that supports what they oppose on their platforms.
no, claiming the world is run by baby-raping devil worshippers is nothing new, and they haven't resorted to outright censorship on multiple platforms before.
I made the mistake of focusing on their goofy mythology and constantly-failing predictions, but the real significance is that these people are arming up and creating support networks. they're like a national militia with the capacity to seriously oppose existing power structures - they're only loosely connected and organized around an ideology, but at the same time they're well-armed and believe they'll have to defend their families and communities -
2020-12-02 at 10:46 PM UTC
Originally posted by aldra no, claiming the world is run by baby-raping devil worshippers is nothing new, and they haven't resorted to outright censorship on multiple platforms before.
I made the mistake of focusing on their goofy mythology and constantly-failing predictions, but the real significance is that these people are arming up and creating support networks. they're like a national militia with the capacity to seriously oppose existing power structures - they're only loosely connected and organized around an ideology, but at the same time they're well-armed and believe they'll have to defend their families and communities
So you think/know there is strong, credible evidence to suggest that the Democrats stole the vote? Or is it just this aura from this large amount of armed, pissed off conservatives that lends credence to the idea?
They've been whipped up into a feeding frenzy since the start of Trump's first election campaign. They've been told to distrust and hate, they've been told they've been deceived and now the man that told them this seems to have lost the election. I'm just going to wait and see, but it looks like a lot of hot air to me at the moment. -
2020-12-02 at 11:12 PM UTC
Originally posted by infinityshock lovingly allowed lard-ass lanny the luxury of lapping the loins-leviathan while the little lad larps as a laotian ladyboy lapdancer---.0101110--1-1-----10.-110.1011-----...-.1.0-1-.1010-10--01-010------.-.1-------.-1----000011---(banned) wrong.
again.
as usual.
Go ahead and put your pink hat on bitch -
2020-12-03 at 5:41 AM UTC
Originally posted by street_carp So you think/know there is strong, credible evidence to suggest that the Democrats stole the vote? Or is it just this aura from this large amount of armed, pissed off conservatives that lends credence to the idea?
Doesn't matter what I think in this - what I'm saying is almost half of US voters don't think the election was fair, and a sizeable chunk of them feel strongly enough about it to arm up, network and prepare for some kind of reckoning. Deriding them wholesale as rednecks, white supremecists or whatever else is just dangerous self-delusion - whatever you think of their motivations, trying to minimise them does not make them any less serious and actively stifles the chances of a political solution.
For the record I think that liberal democracy is doomed to fail and that western electoral systems (and by extension, bases of political power) are subservient to financial power by design, not by mistake or corruption. In this case yes, I believe that the Democrats were more involved in manipulation but not so much in the left/right paradigm, but in terms of the establishment vs. disruption of the status quo -
2020-12-03 at 9:10 AM UTC
Originally posted by aldra Doesn't matter what I think in this - what I'm saying is almost half of US voters don't think the election was fair, and a sizeable chunk of them feel strongly enough about it to arm up, network and prepare for some kind of reckoning. Deriding them wholesale as rednecks, white supremecists or whatever else is just dangerous self-delusion - whatever you think of their motivations, trying to minimise them does not make them any less serious and actively stifles the chances of a political solution.
For the record I think that liberal democracy is doomed to fail and that western electoral systems (and by extension, bases of political power) are subservient to financial power by design, not by mistake or corruption. In this case yes, I believe that the Democrats were more involved in manipulation but not so much in the left/right paradigm, but in terms of the establishment vs. disruption of the status quo
I'm with you, I know the failings encompass and are bigger than the whole two party system. But I also think the people that we're talking about will not be the vector for reform. They want Trump, most of them couldn't give a fuck about a political solution. -
2020-12-04 at 1:20 AM UTCI GOTZ DA PROOFS LOOOOOK LOLZ
-
2020-12-04 at 1:28 AM UTC
Originally posted by street_carp I'm with you, I know the failings encompass and are bigger than the whole two party system. But I also think the people that we're talking about will not be the vector for reform. They want Trump, most of them couldn't give a fuck about a political solution.
I predicted it a long time ago - there's no political solution, and that's what I'm trying to get at here.
Trump was never 'supposed' to be elected - the reason he made it in in the first place was because he represented a protest vote against the status quo and the powers that be didn't consider him a serious threat until it was far too late. He campaigned on things like stronger border control and an end to foreign interventions (in most cases he unfortunately bent the knee and kissed the boot/wall) - things that voters never typically get a say in, and as a reward his administration was undermined and hamstrung from day one.
After four years of obstruction, accusations of being a 'Russian puppet' and other constant attacks in mainstream media, why would his supporters accept defeat?
After four years of the establishment constantly undermining the process that elected their leader as well as the office in general, why should they be expected to trust it again the moment someone else is elected? -
2020-12-04 at 1:32 AM UTC
Originally posted by aldra I predicted it a long time ago - there's no political solution, and that's what I'm trying to get at here.
Trump was never 'supposed' to be elected - the reason he made it in in the first place was because he represented a protest vote against the status quo and the powers that be didn't consider him a serious threat until it was far too late. He campaigned on things like stronger border control and an end to foreign interventions (in most cases he unfortunately bent the knee and kissed the boot/wall) - things that voters never typically get a say in, and as a reward his administration was undermined and hamstrung from day one.
After four years of obstruction, accusations of being a 'Russian puppet' and other constant attacks in mainstream media, why would his supporters accept defeat?
After four years of the establishment constantly undermining the process that elected their leader as well as the office in general, why should they be expected to trust it again the moment someone else is elected?
Lol just out of curiosity, what exactly do you think happened during the Obama administration if you think the Trump administration was hamstrung?
Y'all really need to get off this "da Trump administration was treated so unfairly" shit -
2020-12-04 at 1:33 AM UTC
-
2020-12-04 at 1:40 AM UTC
-
2020-12-04 at 1:43 AM UTCif you're seriously trying to say his "maybe the Russians can find Hillary's emails" joke is evidence of 'foreign interference' your IQ is too low for this conversation
-
2020-12-04 at 1:58 AM UTC
Originally posted by aldra if you're seriously trying to say his "maybe the Russians can find Hillary's emails" joke is evidence of 'foreign interference' your IQ is too low for this conversation
If you're going to act like the meeting with Jr and company at Trump tower with the russian lawyer Veselnitskaya didn't happen, or that the moment Trump won the Republican nomination the RNC didn't immediately change the party stance on russian sanctions didn't happen, or Roger Stone openly bragging on Twitter about his communication with who he thought was a russian hacker didn't happen, you might want to check your own IQ Kremlinbro -
2020-12-04 at 2:28 AM UTC
Originally posted by larrylegend8383 If you're going to act like the meeting with Jr and company at Trump tower with the russian lawyer Veselnitskaya didn't happen, or that the moment Trump won the Republican nomination the RNC didn't immediately change the party stance on russian sanctions didn't happen, or Roger Stone openly bragging on Twitter about his communication with who he thought was a russian hacker didn't happen, you might want to check your own IQ Kremlinbro
1. That was a political trick on her part
2. Sanctions weren't legitimate in the first place and there's no reason they shouldn't have been revisited
3. Roger Stone is an idiot -
2020-12-04 at 3:17 AM UTC
Originally posted by aldra 1. That was a political trick on her part
2. Sanctions weren't legitimate in the first place and there's no reason they shouldn't have been revisited
3. Roger Stone is an idiot
1. Doesn't refute Jr and company seeking assistance
2. Explains your whole stance kremlinbro
3. Doesn't change anything, close personal friend of Trump. -
2020-12-04 at 3:24 AM UTC
Originally posted by larrylegend8383 1. Doesn't refute Jr and company seeking assistance
2. Explains your whole stance kremlinbro
3. Doesn't change anything, close personal friend of Trump.
1. she essentially said she had political collateral in an effort to draw them into a meeting about something else entirely.
2. if you actually want to learn something, have a look into how she earned the nickname Victoria 'Fuck the EU' Nuland, how long and why Crimea was under the Ukraine's stewardship and what actual ties the region even has to Kiev.
3. Who cares.
None of the things you've mentioned, even taken at face value, demonstrate anything untoward. Contact and work with foreign nationals is a key part of political life, and the fact that you think any of those things is a problem on the basis that they're Russian seems rather racist. -
2020-12-04 at 3:48 AM UTCcrippled poeple's little world;s and smart existance
-
2020-12-04 at 5:16 AM UTC
Originally posted by aldra 1. she essentially said she had political collateral in an effort to draw them into a meeting about something else entirely.
2. if you actually want to learn something, have a look into how she earned the nickname Victoria 'Fuck the EU' Nuland, how long and why Crimea was under the Ukraine's stewardship and what actual ties the region even has to Kiev.
3. Who cares.
None of the things you've mentioned, even taken at face value, demonstrate anything untoward. Contact and work with foreign nationals is a key part of political life, and the fact that you think any of those things is a problem on the basis that they're Russian seems rather racist.
You're brushing off the reasons why there was an investigation. Bro it wasn't a witch hunt. It's like if the police were staking out a known drug dealer and observed you visiting. Once you leave and start swerving down the road you're probably going to get pulled over. It's common knowledge that would happen and anyone outraged by that needs a hard dose of reality to sober up. -
2020-12-04 at 7:26 AM UTC
Originally posted by larrylegend8383 You're brushing off the reasons why there was an investigation. Bro it wasn't a witch hunt. It's like if the police were staking out a known drug dealer and observed you visiting. Once you leave and start swerving down the road you're probably going to get pulled over. It's common knowledge that would happen and anyone outraged by that needs a hard dose of reality to sober up.
I said there was no evidence and you presented this
