Rump's Legal Team Getting Their Aeeae Handed To Them

2020-11-25 at 9:56 PM UTC

#1

stl1 Cum Lickin' Fagit

The New York Times
Over 30 Trump Campaign Lawsuits Have Failed. Some Rulings Are Scathing.
Alan Feuer and Zach Montague

Judges, a generally sober lot, are not as a rule given to snark, sarcasm or outbursts of emotion in their orders.

But in the nearly three dozen lawsuits challenging the 2020 election that the Trump campaign and its proxies have either lost or withdrawn in recent weeks, a number of judges have lost patience.

Pennsylvania

Oct. 10

“Perhaps Plaintiffs are right that guards should be placed near drop boxes, signature-analysis experts should examine every mail-in ballot, poll watchers should be able to man any poll regardless of location, and other security improvements should be made. But the job of an unelected federal judge isn’t to suggest election improvements, especially when those improvements contradict the reasoned judgment of democratically elected officials.”

“Put differently, federal judges can have a lot of power — especially when issuing injunctions. And sometimes we may even have a good idea or two. But the Constitution sets out our sphere of decision-making, and that sphere does not extend to second-guessing and interfering with a state’s reasonable, nondiscriminatory election rules.”

Judge J. Nicholas Ranjan of the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania, dismissing the Trump campaign’s attempt to stop Pennsylvania counties from using ballot drop boxes and from tallying absentee ballots that were not in a “secrecy” envelope.

Nov. 21

“This claim, like Frankenstein’s Monster, has been haphazardly stitched together… This Court has been presented with strained legal arguments without merit and speculative accusations, unpled in the operative complaint and unsupported by evidence. In the United States of America, this cannot justify the disenfranchisement of a single voter, let alone all the voters of its sixth most populated state. Our people, laws, and institutions demand more.”

Judge Matthew W. Brann of the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania, dismissing the Trump campaign’s attempt to block certification of Pennsylvania’s election result. (The state certified its results on Tuesday.)

______

Texas

Nov. 2

“Here, the court finds the plaintiffs did not act with alacrity. There has been an increasing amount of conversation and action around the subject of implementing drive-through voting since earlier this summer…”

“At virtually any point, but certainly by October 12, 2020, plaintiffs could have filed this action. Instead, they waited until October 28, 2020 at 9:08 p.m. to file their complaint and did not file their actual motion for temporary relief until midday on October 30, 2020 — the last day of early voting.”

Judge Andrew S. Hanen of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas, dismissing a Republican-led lawsuit seeking to end drive-through voting in heavily Democratic Harris County, Texas.

______

Michigan

Nov. 6

“This ‘supplemental evidence’ is inadmissible as hearsay. The assertion that Connarn was informed by an unknown individual what ‘other hired poll workers at her table’ had been told is inadmissible hearsay within hearsay, and plaintiffs have provided no hearsay exception for either level of hearsay that would warrant consideration of the evidence."

Judge Cynthia Stephens of the Michigan Court of Claims, dismissing a Republican-led lawsuit attempting to stop the count of absentee ballots in the state.

Nov. 13

“Perhaps if plaintiffs’ election challenger affiants had attended the Oct. 29, 2020, walk-through of the TCF Center ballot-counting location, questions and concerns could have been answered in advance of Election Day. Regrettably, they did not and, therefore, plaintiffs’ affiants did not have a full understanding” of the absentee ballot tabulation process.”

Judge Timothy M. Kenny of the Third Judicial Circuit Court of Michigan, dismissing a Republican-led suit seeking to stop the certification of the vote in Wayne County. (Michigan certified its results on Monday.)

______

Georgia

Nov. 19

“To halt the certification at literally the 11th hour would breed confusion and disenfranchisement that I find have no basis in fact and law.”

Judge Steven D. Grimberg of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, in a ruling from the bench, turning down an emergency request from a Trump supporter, L. Lin Wood, to halt certification of the vote in Georgia. (Georgia certified its results on Friday.)

Nov. 20

“Although Wood generally claims fundamental unfairness, and the declarations and testimony submitted in support of his motion speculate as to widespread impropriety, the actual harm alleged by Wood concerns merely a “garden variety” election dispute. Wood does not allege unfairness in counting the ballots; instead, he alleges that select non-party, partisan monitors were not permitted to observe the Audit in an ideal manner. Wood presents no authority, and the Court finds none, providing for a right to unrestrained observation or monitoring of vote counting, recounting, or auditing.

Judge Grimberg, once again turning down Mr. Wood’s emergency request to halt certification of the vote in Georgia.

2020-11-25 at 10:07 PM UTC

#2

livingelegy motherfucker [my polyoicous forward graciousness]

xD federal judges standing up for a fraudster is so le funni

2020-11-25 at 10:40 PM UTC

#3

larrylegend8383 Naturally Camouflaged

So no actual evidence?

The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!

stl1

2020-11-25 at 10:45 PM UTC

#4

larrylegend8383 Naturally Camouflaged

With no evidence? Sounds like a Giuliani move.

2020-11-25 at 10:57 PM UTC

#5

Ghost Black Hole

okay sounds good POS that molests children in the basement of comet ping pong

2020-11-25 at 11:20 PM UTC

#6

larrylegend8383 Naturally Camouflaged

But why haven't they submitted evidence in court?

2020-11-25 at 11:28 PM UTC

#7

stl1 Cum Lickin' Fagit

Just like the Senate impeachment hearings, there was no evidence presented.

2020-11-25 at 11:29 PM UTC

#8

-SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]

It's great these partisan hacks are too stupid to delay their bogus rulings and try to run out the clock, on the way to the SCOTUS. They've inadvertently expedited the process. Fucking dumbshits.

2020-11-25 at 11:34 PM UTC

#9

Ghost Black Hole

they have

2020-11-26 at 12:09 AM UTC

#10

larrylegend8383 Naturally Camouflaged

Like bring evidence to court?

2020-11-26 at 12:15 AM UTC

#11

Ghost Black Hole

they did

https://www.forbes.com/sites/alisondurkee/2020/11/25/pennsylvania-court-temporarily-blocks-state-from-certifying-votes-in-response-to-gop-challenge/?sh=45275b5b5907

2020-11-26 at 12:17 AM UTC

#12

larrylegend8383 Naturally Camouflaged

Do you have any evidence to back up those claims, baby girl?

2020-11-26 at 12:24 AM UTC

#13

larrylegend8383 Naturally Camouflaged

So again, no evidence? Damn you're struggling bro bro

2020-11-26 at 12:36 AM UTC

#14

larrylegend8383 Naturally Camouflaged

You'd probably have better luck talkin to a judge like that than Giuliani has going in front of a judge with no evidence

2020-11-26 at 12:48 AM UTC

#15

larrylegend8383 Naturally Camouflaged

Lol I think you're praying that it means something that it doesn't

2020-11-26 at 2:31 AM UTC

#16

Sudo Black Hole [my hereto riemannian peach]

Just shut up and move on to the next old white piece of shit, this one didn't last as long as they usually do. Cool/meh

2020-11-26 at 2:36 AM UTC

#17

Sudo Black Hole [my hereto riemannian peach]

Shut up you delusional irrelevant faux edgy old faggot, nobody cares about the dumbed down reality you live in. Literally nobody, that's the one thing that's immediately apparent about you: nobody cares about you and you like to make things up

2020-11-26 at 2:43 AM UTC

#18

aldra JIDF Controlled Opposition

wow what a bunch of rigger lovers

2020-11-26 at 2:49 AM UTC

#19

Sudo Black Hole [my hereto riemannian peach]

Why would I watch that? I don't care, it looks absolutely laughable, it means nothing and most of all, it's not going to change 1 fucking thing.

Your theory is some "hearing" that was covered by no one but the super unrespected NTD "news" is somehow going to overturn an election that's about 15 seconds from being cemented in stone? Now that's fucking funny. You live in Florida don't you? That explains so, so much.

2020-11-26 at 2:53 AM UTC

#20

Sudo Black Hole [my hereto riemannian peach]

What did you think of Trump's 64 second briefing where he did everything to avoid talking about the election? Does that seem like someone who's going to be president for the next 4 years? Is that not hilarious? How stupid are you? I bet your IQ is less than half of the electoral votes Trump got (not enough)

User Controls

Navigation

Rump's Legal Team Getting Their Aeeae Handed To Them