User Controls
T*rumps DHS Agency calls the 2020 Election the Safest in US History
-
2020-11-16 at 10:50 PM UTC
-
2020-11-16 at 10:51 PM UTC
-
2020-11-16 at 10:53 PM UTC
-
2020-11-16 at 10:57 PM UTClarry, go lay down ur shit is tired
-
2020-11-16 at 11:05 PM UTCIf the Dems really have nothing to hide, why are they fighting transparency so hard? Good question, eh?
-
2020-11-16 at 11:11 PM UTC
-
2020-11-16 at 11:12 PM UTC
-
2020-11-16 at 11:12 PM UTCThey can recount every state 20 X. trump will just lose 20 X. No biggie
-
2020-11-16 at 11:15 PM UTC
-
2020-11-16 at 11:18 PM UTC
-
2020-11-16 at 11:23 PM UTC
Originally posted by -SpectraL Elections are supposed to be fair, open and transparent. Or so we were led to believe.
Yeah i would like to think so. I was just posing an answer to your question.
In my personal opinion, I would have no problem whatsoever if they literally did a hand recount of every single ballot in every single state, all filmed on live TV for everyone to watch. I dont want the incorrect person being voted in, that's for sure. -
2020-11-16 at 11:50 PM UTC
Originally posted by mmQ Yeah i would like to think so. I was just posing an answer to your question.
In my personal opinion, I would have no problem whatsoever if they literally did a hand recount of every single ballot in every single state, all filmed on live TV for everyone to watch. I dont want the incorrect person being voted in, that's for sure.
But the question remains: why on Earth are the Democrats fighting transparency so hard right now? If they truly believe they won fair and square, why not let the world see it and know it? Why not show the world how huge they won? And yet, here they are in the courts, fighting tooth and nail to prevent any kind of transparency. You know, there's only one answer. There could only be one answer. And the answer is because they tried to rig the election and got caught, and now they're trying to block justice. -
2020-11-16 at 11:52 PM UTC
-
2020-11-17 at 12:06 AM UTC
Originally posted by -SpectraL But the question remains: why on Earth are the Democrats fighting transparency so hard right now? If they truly believe they won fair and square, why not let the world see it and know it? Why not show the world how huge they won? And yet, here they are in the courts, fighting tooth and nail to prevent any kind of transparency. You know, there's only one answer. There could only be one answer. And the answer is because they tried to rig the election and got caught, and now they're trying to block justice.
I understand. It may be a matter of 'dont mistake my kindness for weakness.' It may be a matter of pride. I'm not sure.
It's one thing to say, I have nothing to hide, so do whatever you want. But it's also human nature to say, though I have nothing to hide, I'm not gonna just be a little bitch and let you do whatever you want.
This isnt all taking place in a vacuum and theres a lot of pride and ego and every other emotional aspect involved, combined with the bullshittery of politics in general. It looks fucky on both sides no matter how you look at it. -
2020-11-17 at 12:28 AM UTCI'll add that as much as I think the United states justice system is a fucking joke, I fully back the concept of innocent until proven guilty.
It's very easy to get the lynch mob going and make up minds before an actual trial and all that, but ultimately, innocent until proven guilty. What's the thing we say nkw.. the court of public opinion...
The court of public opinion can be damning as fuck. But it means nothing since it's so easily persuaded in this snowball effect type deal.
How many people thought T×ump was unfairly elected due to Russian collusion or whatever? Millions and millions. Hang him! Collusion! Obvious! 95% of those people probably didnt even known the definition of collusion. People just parrot shit to try and sound 'WOKE'.
Everyone knows everything and everyone is right.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2020-11-17 at 12:31 AM UTC
Originally posted by mmQ I understand. It may be a matter of 'dont mistake my kindness for weakness.' It may be a matter of pride. I'm not sure.
It's one thing to say, I have nothing to hide, so do whatever you want. But it's also human nature to say, though I have nothing to hide, I'm not gonna just be a little bitch and let you do whatever you want.
This isnt all taking place in a vacuum and theres a lot of pride and ego and every other emotional aspect involved, combined with the bullshittery of politics in general. It looks fucky on both sides no matter how you look at it.
But this kind of behavior isn't actually relevant or linked to pride or ego or "laying down". The only request here that's been made is to have a fair, open and transparent election process, that's it. The Democrats are fighting that. Right now. In the courts and on all their fakestream goon media channels. Why? The answer is quite clear, to any sensible, fair and truly unbiased person. -
2020-11-17 at 12:34 AM UTC
Originally posted by -SpectraL But this kind of behavior isn't actually relevant or linked to pride or ego or "laying down". The only request here that's been made is to have a fair, open and transparent election process, that's it. The Democrats are fighting that. Right now. In the courts and on all their fakestream goon media channels. Why? The answer is quite clear, to any sensible, fair and truly unbiased person.
You keep saying "but.." to my replies when I'm just suggesting answers to your questions, as if I'm saying that my answer are the definitive reasons why things are happening. They may or may be. I don't fucking know. I'm brainstorming. I'm thinking how the other side might think. You need to be able to do that. -
2020-11-17 at 12:54 AM UTC
Originally posted by mmQ You keep saying "but.." to my replies when I'm just suggesting answers to your questions, as if I'm saying that my answer are the definitive reasons why things are happening. They may or may be. I don't fucking know. I'm brainstorming. I'm thinking how the other side might think. You need to be able to do that.
I'm more results-based analytical oriented. -
2020-11-17 at 1 AM UTCThe following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2020-11-17 at 1:03 AM UTC1. The Dems tried to steal the election.
2. The Dems fucked up, trying to steal the election.
3. The Dems are now trying to cover up their fuckups trying to steal the election.
No need to overthink this.
