User Controls
Election bets
-
2020-11-08 at 12:25 AM UTC
Originally posted by MexicanMasterRace Oh, it has finished developing.
The only reason you're saying this is because Trump is saying this. But not even FOX is saying this.
In fact, nobody who is even remotely credible is saying this anymore. Biden has won. It's done. Don't you think FOX would like to stretch it out and try and rile voters into getting Trump to win? No. They know it's over.
The only reason I'm saying this is that it's true. *shrug*
The results so far aren't final, and because of America's fucked up and backwards electoral process even if they were it wouldn't necessarily determine who is actually elected president. -
2020-11-08 at 12:50 AM UTC
Originally posted by Meikai The only reason I'm saying this is that it's true. *shrug*
The results so far aren't final, and because of America's fucked up and backwards electoral process even if they were it wouldn't necessarily determine who is actually elected president.
*sigh*
You don't think this is taken into consideration when an election is called?
Faithless electors cannot save Trump. There have only ever been 156 faithless electors out of 24,748 total electors since 1776. That is 0.7%. In 2016 we had 7. That is about 1%. Five of these were nullified by state laws and either had their vote changed, or the elector replaced with a faithful one thanks to state laws protecting democracy.
The GOP simply does not have enough electors in power to make this a possibility. Any state they could flip wouldn't matter. Trump statistically cannot win. And he has no evidence of voter fraud so all his cases are being denied. AP doesn't just call it because the popular vote gets close. They call it when there is no potential out for the loser.
Again, you're simply spitting Trump propaganda and you don't even know it. I understand our electoral system is confusing to you, but do try to understand it. -
2020-11-08 at 1:10 AM UTC
Originally posted by MexicanMasterRace *sigh*
You don't think this is taken into consideration when an election is called?
Faithless electors cannot save Trump. There have only ever been 156 faithless electors out of 24,748 total electors since 1776. That is 0.7%. In 2016 we had 7. That is about 1%. Five of these were nullified by state laws and either had their vote changed, or the elector replaced with a faithful one thanks to state laws protecting democracy.
The GOP simply does not have enough electors in power to make this a possibility. Any state they could flip wouldn't matter. Trump statistically cannot win. And he has no evidence of voter fraud so all his cases are being denied. AP doesn't just call it because the popular vote gets close. They call it when there is no potential out for the loser.
Again, you're simply spitting Trump propaganda and you don't even know it. I understand our electoral system is confusing to you, but do try to understand it.
Like I said, it's like a 99.99% certainty (which is why the media called it), but it isn't official. No money should change hands until it is. All I'm saying is you should be patient. -
2020-11-08 at 1:12 AM UTC
-
2020-11-08 at 1:22 AM UTC
-
2020-11-08 at 1:24 AM UTC
Originally posted by MexicanMasterRace *sigh*
You don't think this is taken into consideration when an election is called?
Faithless electors cannot save Trump. There have only ever been 156 faithless electors out of 24,748 total electors since 1776. That is 0.7%. In 2016 we had 7. That is about 1%. Five of these were nullified by state laws and either had their vote changed, or the elector replaced with a faithful one thanks to state laws protecting democracy.
The GOP simply does not have enough electors in power to make this a possibility. Any state they could flip wouldn't matter. Trump statistically cannot win. And he has no evidence of voter fraud so all his cases are being denied. AP doesn't just call it because the popular vote gets close. They call it when there is no potential out for the loser.
Again, you're simply spitting Trump propaganda and you don't even know it. I understand our electoral system is confusing to you, but do try to understand it.
What if the Supreme Court rules enough Democrat votes nullified that Trump ends up with more electoral votes than Biden? Have you ever considered that path? -
2020-11-08 at 1:34 AM UTC
-
2020-11-08 at 1:35 AM UTCThis was a landslide win guys. Trump has no chance.
-
2020-11-08 at 1:37 AM UTC
Originally posted by MexicanMasterRace As predicted, G is too poor to pay up.
Paid in full to your psychosis shelter acct/Alfredo Sinterosa , which was the only one to respond w/ contact info. via PM on the same day of the bet, knew the Gnome stories,all your aliases,several pics & so forth. Get help son I even have the screen caps from chat & PMs here where you said when you wig out non-medicated you'd post these exact things. It's not a troll act like you try & sale, it's legit mental illness.
"poor" kid I keep 5g's in crypto, this is child's play.
Enjoy the funds when your psychosis breaks & don't waste it all on bullshit "THC".
-
2020-11-08 at 1:42 AM UTCYawn.
It's okay. I didn't expect you to pay out. Like I said, I know you can't afford it. No need to set up an elaborate troll. If it was real you'd post the blockchain. But I know you won't. -
2020-11-08 at 1:42 AM UTCBrb gonna edit the source code on coinbase
-
2020-11-08 at 2:09 AM UTC
-
2020-11-08 at 2:39 AM UTC
-
2020-11-08 at 2:42 AM UTCG too poor to pay his bet
-
2020-11-08 at 2:48 AM UTC
Regarding the miniscule chance that some confirmation process might result in Trump somehow winning...
If that happens, just put the money towards a charitable cause of your choosing.
EDIT: I had to change the bold part because my own bet is starting to confuse me.
I betted on the one I was wanting to lose, but thought would win.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2020-11-08 at 2:51 AM UTCI realize my $50 (Canadian dollars at that) isn't big compared to G's bet, but then again, making triple digit bets online with no escrow service or broker of some kind never really struck me as such a good idea.
-
2020-11-08 at 3:27 AM UTC
Originally posted by gadzooks
Regarding the miniscule chance that some confirmation process might result in Trump somehow winning…
If that happens, just put the money towards a charitable cause of your choosing.
EDIT: I had to change the bold part because my own bet is starting to confuse me.
I betted on the one I was wanting to lose, but thought would win.
Honest man.
If Trump wins I send you $80 USD and you can donate it to a charitable cause of your choosing. If there is a civil war I will use it to buy sheet metal and fortify my windows.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2020-11-08 at 3:42 AM UTCImagine being so dumbed-down brainwashed that you actually believe fake news networks and Democrat-controlled strongholds certify election results.
-
2020-11-08 at 3:47 AM UTCImagine being SpectraL.
*shudders* -
2020-11-08 at 6:24 AM UTCWhere I bet (government run website), the results are still pending.
Funnily enough I put money on this bet:
How Many Of These States Will Trump Win? Florida, Ohio, Georgia, N. Carolina, Texas And Arizona
The options were 0, 1, 2, and 3. It looks like he will win 4. I put money on 3. I guess that means I'm out on all my bets.
