User Controls
No such thing as voter fraud?
-
2020-10-29 at 7:18 AM UTC
-
2020-10-29 at 7:30 AM UTCokay peedy calm down. More people get struck by lightning than there are cases of voter fraud which is something your fake news media won't tell you
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2020-10-29 at 7:33 AM UTCThat guys channel is pretty good
-
2020-10-29 at 7:53 AM UTC
-
2020-10-29 at 8:23 AM UTC
Originally posted by Ghost okay peedy calm down. More people get struck by lightning than there are cases of voter fraud which is something your fake news media won't tell you
He is full of shit. Between 1959 and 2003 there were 3,696 people killed in the U.S by lightning. Between 1982 and 2020 there have been 1071 proven cases of voter fraud. That means 90 people per year are killed by lightning in the US and 40 times per year voter fraud is detected and proven. If you think that every case of voter fraud ever committed has been detected and proven I want to sell you stuff too. -
2020-10-29 at 10:40 AM UTC
Originally posted by Speedy Parker He is full of shit. Between 1959 and 2003 there were 3,696 people killed in the U.S by lightning. Between 1982 and 2020 there have been 1071 proven cases of voter fraud. That means 90 people per year are killed by lightning in the US and 40 times per year voter fraud is detected and proven. If you think that every case of voter fraud ever committed has been detected and proven I want to sell you stuff too.
Have you thought about investing your inheritance in a nice Trump University package? It'll pay for itself in nooo time, greybro. -
2020-10-29 at 11 AM UTC
-
2020-10-29 at 11:31 AM UTC
Originally posted by Speedy Parker He is full of shit. Between 1959 and 2003 there were 3,696 people killed in the U.S by lightning. Between 1982 and 2020 there have been 1071 proven cases of voter fraud. That means 90 people per year are killed by lightning in the US and 40 times per year voter fraud is detected and proven. If you think that every case of voter fraud ever committed has been detected and proven I want to sell you stuff too.
LMAO
The documented numbers say he is right and you are wrong, so... your counterargument is literally specifically faith in undetected, unproven voter fraud that must be happening because otherwise your narrative is wrong. -
2020-10-29 at 11:34 AM UTCAnd all this to try to make the chances comparable to being struck by lightning, the literal textbook example of an event so unlikely to happen free of circumstance that it is not possible or worthwhile to account for it.
So basically he is right, and even if his example is wrong (which it is not), he is still correct about voter fraud being virtually nonexistent.
Good fight, Speedy. Your sheer mental retardation dependably reaches new peaks on a regular basis.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2020-10-29 at 1:57 PM UTC
-
2020-10-29 at 1:58 PM UTC
-
2020-10-29 at 3:16 PM UTC
-
2020-10-29 at 4:25 PM UTCThe best part of Biden potentially winning will be Speedy slitting his wristsThe following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2020-10-29 at 5:19 PM UTC
-
2020-10-29 at 8:35 PM UTCi see you argue that more voter fraud is occurring than that which is successfully prosecuted, but that you don’t provide a value for its more frequent occurrence or anywhere to find it.
that would mean there’s a variable in your assessment which represents incidences of voter fraud unproven, or even which have gone unnoticed altogether. i have to acknowledge that, at the very least, some incidence of such is conceivable, if not also likely.
but when you (& others of your persuasion on this issue) imply that this variable might be assumed tremendous by some ambiguous measure in order to supplement your argument with what you treat as further, logically-obtained proof (or say it outright), i can’t help but suspect that you want nothing less than for me to allow that variable into discourse as though it’s a blank check in your hand.
-
2020-10-29 at 8:48 PM UTC
Originally posted by Zanick i see you argue that more voter fraud is occurring than that which is successfully prosecuted, but that you don’t provide a value for its more frequent occurrence or anywhere to find it.
that would mean there’s a variable in your assessment which represents incidences of voter fraud unproven, or even which have gone unnoticed altogether. i have to acknowledge that, at the very least, some incidence of such is conceivable, if not also likely.
but when you (& others of your persuasion on this issue) imply that this variable might be assumed tremendous by some ambiguous measure in order to supplement your argument with what you treat as further, logically-obtained proof (or say it outright), i can’t help but suspect that you want nothing less than for me to allow that variable into discourse as though it’s a blank check in your hand.
This entire post could have been stated in two simple sentences:
"You seem to be claiming that the real amount of voter fraud is at least 2.25x that of proven and pursued voter fraud. On what basis do you hold that belief?"
Or:
Originally posted by ORACLE The documented numbers say he is right and you are wrong, so… your counterargument is literally specifically faith in undetected, unproven voter fraud that must be happening because otherwise your narrative is wrong.
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2020-10-29 at 8:49 PM UTCIt's typical that more nefarious stuff goes on than is caught...serial killers for example..there are estimated to be 25-50 or something active ones in the US..but only 1 or 2 a year are caught. Same with shoplifting...
-
2020-10-29 at 8:53 PM UTC
Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson It's typical that more nefarious stuff goes on than is caught…serial killers for example..there are estimated to be 25-50 or something active ones in the US..but only 1 or 2 a year are caught. Same with shoplifting…
"That which is asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence." - Christopher WalkenThe following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2020-10-29 at 8:56 PM UTC
-
2020-10-29 at 8:57 PM UTC
