User Controls
Trump admits he knew coronavirus was ‘deadly’ and worse than the flu while intentionally misleading Americans
-
2020-10-27 at 4:23 PM UTCDude why are you talking to spectral
-
2020-10-27 at 4:26 PM UTC
-
2020-10-27 at 4:38 PM UTC
Originally posted by mmQ Can a wrong be corrected by someone else?
What happens when you say something as fact, and it's wrong at the time, but then later, it turns out that it was right?
Can anything truly ever be right or wrong on a holistic scale when 100% of all possible evidence is never presented?
What can truly be right? Math? Formulas? Anything else?
Everything Is Futile
These are the words of the Teacher (King Solomon), the son of David, king in Jerusalem:
“Futility of futilities,” says the Teacher, “futility of futilities!". "Everything is futile!”
What does a man gain from all his labor, at which he toils under the sun? Generations come and generations go, but the earth remains forever. The sun rises and the sun sets; it hurries back to where it rises. The wind blows southward, then turns northward; round and round it swirls, ever returning on its course. All the rivers flow into the sea, yet the sea is never full; to the place from which the streams come, there again they flow. All things are wearisome, more than one can describe; the eye is not satisfied with seeing, nor the ear content with hearing.
What has been will be again, and what has been done will be done again; there is nothing new under the sun. Is there a case where one can say, “Look, this is new”? It has already existed in the ages before us. There is no remembrance of those who came before, and those yet to come will not be remembered by those who follow after.
With Wisdom Comes Sorrow
I, the Teacher, was king over Israel in Jerusalem. And I set my mind to seek and explore by wisdom all that is done under heaven. What a heavy burden God has laid upon the sons of men to occupy them! I have seen all the things that are done under the sun, and have found them all to be futile, a pursuit of the wind. What is crooked cannot be straightened, and what is lacking cannot be counted. I said to myself, “Behold, I have grown and increased in wisdom beyond all those before me who were over Jerusalem, and my mind has observed a wealth of wisdom and knowledge.” I set my mind to know wisdom and madness and folly; I learned that this, too, is a pursuit of the wind. For with much wisdom comes much sorrow, and as knowledge grows, grief increases. -
2020-10-27 at 4:42 PM UTCYeah, well that's just like, King Solomon's opinion, man.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2020-10-27 at 4:46 PM UTC
-
2020-10-27 at 4:48 PM UTC
-
2020-10-27 at 4:49 PM UTCDemocrats are using masks to be political against me
Wearing a mask is the most patriotic thing you can do
Which is it spectral? -
2020-10-27 at 4:54 PM UTC
-
2020-10-27 at 9:22 PM UTC
-
2020-10-27 at 9:24 PM UTC
-
2020-10-27 at 10:31 PM UTC
-
2020-10-27 at 10:52 PM UTCAlso the Lancet just published a study. They don't necessarily approve and agree with all of the claims of every study they publish. They retracted their publication specifically due to their rigour in investigating what they published.
The study was withdrawn because the company that provided data would not provide full access to the information for a third-party peer review, saying to do so would violate client agreements and confidentiality requirements, The Lancet said in a statement.
“Based on this development, we can no longer vouch for the veracity of the primary data sources. Due to this unfortunate development, the authors request that the paper be retracted,” The Lancet said in a statement.
The journal published valid work and retracted it because they could no longer stake their reputation on it, as they did not find all the necessary information in their follow up to allow them to stand behind it. They didn't say "this is false".
Only a very obvious retard (such as a particular literal mongoloid and another retarded Canadian faggot) would try to interpret this as a strike against their reputation.b
Peer review isn't a matter of publishing the truth or a lie, it is about making sure you are publishing real, valid academic work.
The journal's job is not to be the arbiter of truth but to offer other scientists something substantive to look at. Being published is the very first step in the process of academically developing a scientific understanding of a subject.
You cannot test hypotheses or review methodology in the general scope without publishing. I'm this case they believed it was valid work they could stand behind. With the denial of documentation, they could no longer stand behind it. What kind of retarded faggot would take that as a negative? Well I know at least 2 kinds.
Simple fact is that mongoloid kid Vinny is borderline illiterate and has very poor athletic abilities. -
2020-10-27 at 10:59 PM UTCYou can't trust any source that willfully publishes fake studies without verifying the facts first. It's as simple as that. It's called credibility. Even a child could understand the concept, but not a dumb Democrat.
-
2020-10-27 at 11:14 PM UTCCDC finally admits half their novel coronavirus death case numbers were completely fraudulent.
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2020-10-27 at 11:19 PM UTCThere's your official agency, the CDC, saying the numbers are bloated!
Hahahahahaahahaha -
2020-10-28 at 12:28 AM UTC
Originally posted by -SpectraL You can't trust any source that willfully publishes fake studies without verifying the facts first. It's as simple as that. It's called credibility. Even a child could understand the concept, but not a dumb Democrat.
Originally posted by ORACLE Also the Lancet just published a study. They don't necessarily approve and agree with all of the claims of every study they publish. They retracted their publication specifically due to their rigour in investigating what they published.
The journal published valid work and retracted it because they could no longer stake their reputation on it, as they did not find all the necessary information in their follow up to allow them to stand behind it. They didn't say "this is false".
Only a very obvious retard (such as a particular literal mongoloid and another retarded Canadian faggot) would try to interpret this as a strike against their reputation.b
Peer review isn't a matter of publishing the truth or a lie, it is about making sure you are publishing real, valid academic work.
The journal's job is not to be the arbiter of truth but to offer other scientists something substantive to look at. Being published is the very first step in the process of academically developing a scientific understanding of a subject.
You cannot test hypotheses or review methodology in the general scope without publishing. I'm this case they believed it was valid work they could stand behind. With the denial of documentation, they could no longer stand behind it. What kind of retarded faggot would take that as a negative? Well I know at least 2 kinds.
Simple fact is that mongoloid kid Vinny is borderline illiterate and has very poor athletic abilities. -
2020-10-28 at 1:18 AM UTC
Originally posted by ORACLE Also the Lancet just published a study. They don't necessarily approve and agree with all of the claims of every study they publish. They retracted their publication specifically due to their rigour in investigating what they published.
The journal published valid work and retracted it because they could no longer stake their reputation on it, as they did not find all the necessary information in their follow up to allow them to stand behind it. They didn't say "this is false".
Only a very obvious retard (such as a particular literal mongoloid and another retarded Canadian faggot) would try to interpret this as a strike against their reputation.b
Peer review isn't a matter of publishing the truth or a lie, it is about making sure you are publishing real, valid academic work.
The journal's job is not to be the arbiter of truth but to offer other scientists something substantive to look at. Being published is the very first step in the process of academically developing a scientific understanding of a subject.
You cannot test hypotheses or review methodology in the general scope without publishing. I'm this case they believed it was valid work they could stand behind. With the denial of documentation, they could no longer stand behind it. What kind of retarded faggot would take that as a negative? Well I know at least 2 kinds.
Simple fact is that mongoloid kid Vinny is borderline illiterate and has very poor athletic abilities.
they only retracted the "study" after actual scientists and epidemiologists around the world pointed and laughed at their "findings".
neanderthals havent progressed beyond elememtary english comprehenshion.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2020-10-28 at 1:41 AM UTCLol just watching a random documentary and the Lancet came up
Publishing hard science since the 1800's. What champs. -
2020-10-28 at 1:44 AM UTCshe is hot
-
2020-10-28 at 2:06 AM UTC
