User Controls
Trump admits he knew coronavirus was ‘deadly’ and worse than the flu while intentionally misleading Americans
-
2020-10-27 at 12:08 AM UTC
-
2020-10-27 at 12:21 AM UTC
Originally posted by -SpectraL Well, for one, they said vaccines don't cause autism. That is a proven falsehood, as the vaccine injury courts plainly show.
Show me the exact article.
It has been proven that vaccines do not cause autism.So how did the idea that vaccines play a role get started? Much of the blame lies with a study published in 1998 that suggested that the MMR (measles-mumps-rubella) vaccine, or infection with the naturally occurring measles virus itself, might cause autism. Since then, numerous scientific studies have shown that there is no link between vaccines — or any of their ingredients — and autism. And the research used in that study was found to be false, the doctor who wrote it lost his medical license, and the medical journal that published it retracted the paper (this means that they believe it never should have been published).
https://kidshealth.org/en/parents/autism-studies.html
Again GTFOutta here👉The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2020-10-27 at 1:04 AM UTC
Originally posted by Technologist Show me the exact article.
It has been proven that vaccines do not cause autism.
https://kidshealth.org/en/parents/autism-studies.html
Again GTFOutta here👉
Only a born idiot would say vaccines don't cause autism, in the face of a mountain of evidence confirming it. -
2020-10-27 at 1:12 AM UTC
-
2020-10-27 at 1:23 AM UTC
-
2020-10-27 at 1:32 AM UTC
Originally posted by Technologist Let’s see it. Besides the article I quoted where the doc lost his job.
Wouldn't bother. You've already shown you will dismiss ANY evidence out of hand, if it doesn't line up with your spoon-fed CNN propaganda. You won't even look at it, as you've admitted several times already. -
2020-10-27 at 2:30 AM UTC
Originally posted by -SpectraL Wouldn't bother. You've already shown you will dismiss ANY evidence out of hand, if it doesn't line up with your spoon-fed CNN propaganda. You won't even look at it, as you've admitted several times already.
I have not quoted or cited an article from CNN in ages. I’ve said time and time again that CNN is too sappy for my liking. Try again.
If you can show me the article that you brought up about vaccines, I’d happily read it, you see I asked for it.
While you’re at it prove this.......
Originally posted by -SpectraL The Lancet has an anti-Trump/anti-truth bias, which is well documented, if you'd bothered to research it.
I’ll be waiting. -
2020-10-27 at 4:03 AM UTCNo source, no claim
-
2020-10-27 at 9:43 AM UTC^ The masters of fake news puts their feet down.
-
2020-10-27 at 9:51 AM UTC
Originally posted by -SpectraL Only a born idiot would say vaccines don't cause autism, in the face of a mountain of evidence confirming it.
I know right? I've taken a myriad of vaccines throughout my life and I'm clearly at the high-end of the spectrum. I AM THE MOUNTAIN OF EVIDENCE. I AM MEEEEEEEEEEE. REEEEEE!!!!! -
2020-10-27 at 10:03 AM UTC
-
2020-10-27 at 1:53 PM UTC
Originally posted by ORACLE Lancet = "lies and false misinformation" according to Canadian gay Spectard
Originally posted by MexicanMasterRace The Lancet has been credible since 1823.
https://www.webmd.com/lung/news/20200605/lancet-retracts-hydroxychloroquine-study
neanderthals of an order,
concurs together.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2020-10-27 at 2:02 PM UTC
Originally posted by vindicktive vinny https://www.webmd.com/lung/news/20200605/lancet-retracts-hydroxychloroquine-study
neanderthals of an order,
concurs together.
Imagine being so dishonest and corrupt that you'd use sources you've not personally taken the time to verify, and were never verified, then running out to tell the masses something that hasn't even been verified, trying to pass it off as a verified fact. -
2020-10-27 at 2:51 PM UTC
Originally posted by vindicktive vinny https://www.webmd.com/lung/news/20200605/lancet-retracts-hydroxychloroquine-study
neanderthals of an order,
concurs together.
In the mind of a mongoloid^ a credible journal is somehow less credible when they remove a non-credible study.
Nice mongoloid tryThe following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2020-10-27 at 3:25 PM UTC
-
2020-10-27 at 3:30 PM UTC
Originally posted by -SpectraL The point isn't that they removed it, it's that they published it as fact, with prejudice.
It's a weird one. It's like when the justice system sends an innocent man to jail, youd say the justice system failed. But if the justice system later corrects itself and frees said person, you might say the justice system succeeded in doing what it was intended to do. Somehow, it did both things. -
2020-10-27 at 3:33 PM UTC
Originally posted by mmQ It's a weird one. It's like when the justice system sends an innocent man to jail, youd say the justice system failed. But if the justice system later corrects itself and frees said person, you might say the justice system succeeded in doing what it was intended to do. Somehow, it did both things.
If one innocent man is condemned, the system has failed. -
2020-10-27 at 3:44 PM UTC
-
2020-10-27 at 4:09 PM UTC
-
2020-10-27 at 4:15 PM UTC
Originally posted by -SpectraL A wrong can't be corrected. It's too late to correct it, after the wrong has already taken place. The wrong can be rectified, but never corrected.
Can a wrong be corrected by someone else?
What happens when you say something as fact, and it's wrong at the time, but then later, it turns out that it was right?
Can anything truly ever be right or wrong on a holistic scale when 100% of all possible evidence is never presented?
What can truly be right? Math? Formulas? Anything else?
