User Controls
Poll: Republicants
- Are garbage human beings
- Are trash human beings
Life only matters for Republicants until you are born
-
2020-10-19 at 3:17 PM UTC
Originally posted by Bill Krozby actually people have and still do think the earth is flat.
Scientists don't though. The scientists are right. The world is round, not flat. It's the retard conspiracy theorists like you who think the world is flat, and refuse to believe science. They say the same thing, "Science has been wrong before." -
2020-10-19 at 3:25 PM UTC
Originally posted by MexicanMasterRace Scientists don't though. The scientists are right. The world is round, not flat. It's the retard conspiracy theorists like you who think the world is flat, and refuse to believe science. They say the same thing, "Science has been wrong before."
I never said I thought the world was flat. Get real dude, you're like bill nye science guy that thinks theres 2k genders.. you're either guy or your a girl, but you like to larp as a woman because it suits your "needs" but you aren't §m£ÂgØL. -
2020-10-19 at 3:28 PM UTCDouglas thought everybody was lying when people claimed to get sick.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2020-10-19 at 3:29 PM UTCDouglas monks genuinely thought the the hospitals and the morgues were in on the 'conspiracy'...lol. This has nothing to do with science correcting itself over time with the advent of new information. Douglas truly thought that liberals reportedly 'unleashed 'this virus for political reasons...lolThe following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2020-10-19 at 3:31 PM UTCwe worry about ya, doug. The Libs aint out to get ya, my man. Remember, we're all playing for the same team.👍❤
-
2020-10-19 at 3:57 PM UTC
Originally posted by WellHung we worry about ya, doug. The Libs aint out to get ya, my man. Remember, we're all playing for the same team.👍❤
Worry about yourself. I'm not your man and I don't play on your team.
§m£ÂgØL has still yet to give any "facts" on how a fetus isn't a human. Some people will say a fetus isn't conscious so its not living/human.. so by that logic is someone in a coma not a human? It's just a way to discriminate. -
2020-10-19 at 4:19 PM UTCUsing protection or just simply not getting pregnant if you can't afford a baby is such an alien concept apparently
-
2020-10-19 at 4:32 PM UTC
Originally posted by Number13 Using protection or just simply not getting pregnant if you can't afford a baby is such an alien concept apparently
yea but bottom line, doctors look for a heart beat and brain activity in fetus's which is the start of life. If you don't want to have a kid give it up for adoption, theres plenty of people that can't have kids that would be willing to adopt. But opie and matchew have that point of view of its not a human just because they can't have kids (because they're gay) they believe babies are parasites which by their logic makes them parasites.
But then you're talking to §m£ÂgØL who thinks rape culture is real.. like seriously? just a bunch of guys jockey for position to do a rape.. unbelievable.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2020-10-19 at 4:35 PM UTCAllowing abortion on demand shifts way too much power to one gender while infringing on the other (fathers can be compelled into parenthood against their will while mothers are free to abort or give up for adoption) so i really hope that roe v wade shit gets overturned and evens up the balance of power.
on the other hand, i dont wanna pay for some bitches 6 illegitimate children so this is a tough one. -
2020-10-19 at 4:39 PM UTC
Originally posted by Number13 Using protection or just simply not getting pregnant if you can't afford a baby is such an alien concept apparently
In theory, yeah, it's easy, 13... but in practice, its very diificult.. condoms remove the much of the sensitivity, And everyone has that primal urge to make a deposit in their gal.. Thats how Monks had a shorty. -
2020-10-19 at 4:41 PM UTC
Originally posted by WellHung Douglas monks genuinely thought the the hospitals and the morgues were in on the 'conspiracy'…lol. This has nothing to do with science correcting itself over time with the advent of new information. Douglas truly thought that liberals reportedly 'unleashed 'this virus for political reasons…lol
Seriously. These people talk about how science is wrong, but science is based on evidence.
Where is their evidence that this is overplayed? I've yet to see a single study that shows this isn't serious. I mean it's already 12x as deadly as the flu in the US. It's infected less people while killing more. Even if you say that 90% of the COVID deaths are 'faked', this is still a serious fucking issue.
Never mind that deaths aren't the only way this virus harms. People who are asymptomatic are turning up with lung damage from the vascular stress this virus puts on you. It complicates illness in such strange ways, totally unlike what we are used to with flus and colds. Like, a weak liver might be fine with a flu or the cold. But with this? Coronavirus could result in liver failure. Even 10, 20, 30 years down the line, the damage will be lasting. A lot of people will die early deaths due to complications from this. So don't worry if you don't have a pre-existing condition yet, because you'll get one. -
2020-10-19 at 4:50 PM UTC
Originally posted by Kev Allowing abortion on demand shifts way too much power to one gender while infringing on the other (fathers can be compelled into parenthood against their will while mothers are free to abort or give up for adoption) so i really hope that roe v wade shit gets overturned and evens up the balance of power.
on the other hand, i dont wanna pay for some bitches 6 illegitimate children so this is a tough one.
Women are the ones who do all the work of birthing. What the fuck do you want to happen? It's either women get the choice, or men get the choice. In no world is forcing a husband/wife to agree on the abortion at all viable. If they don't agree, then what happens? Does it get aborted, or does one parent get stuck with a child they don't want? It just makes no sense for men to be legally involved in this decision. Literally only Islamic countries do it like you are suggesting.
God it's funny how much Ya'llqueada has in common with Muslim extremists. You cry about Sharia law while trying to implement your own religious law. What hypocrites.
True libertarian freedom involves the right for women to choose. However I do agree that men should be allowed more agency. I think that they should be allowed to opt out of paying child support if they don't want the child, HOWEVER, they should have to pay an increased tax rate for the rest of their lives, with increases for each child they abandon. This would go to a public fund to take care of unwanted children like Bill Krozby's daughter. -
2020-10-19 at 4:52 PM UTC
-
2020-10-19 at 5:02 PM UTC
Originally posted by Kev citation needed, the flu killed 80,000 people last year.
Using CDC numbers, the flu killed 24,000 - 62,000 in 2019. It infected 39,000,000 - 56,000,000. Using the highest estimates, this puts the mortality rate of the flu in 2019 at 0.0011%.
Using CDC numbers, the Coronavirus killed 220,000. It infected 8,190,000. Using these estimates, this puts the mortality rate for the Coronavirus at 0.0268%.
So my bad. You were actually right. The coronavirus isn't 12x as deadly as the flu. It's only 26x as deadly. -
2020-10-19 at 5:17 PM UTCReminder: every time OP uses words like "Republicans", "Conservatives", etc, he means "white people".The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2020-10-19 at 5:18 PM UTC
-
2020-10-19 at 7:43 PM UTC
-
2020-10-19 at 7:44 PM UTC
-
2020-10-19 at 7:47 PM UTCThe demographics which make up the republican base are the most likely to adopt (whites, christians, men), but I can't find any evidence that they're actually republicans. Plenty of whites and christians and men who are democrats. I think it's pretty safe to say that there are plenty who do care once you're born though, and would just prefer to see adoption and voluntary acts of charity be the means by which children are dealt with (as opposed to abortion and involuntary taxation). *shrug*
-
2020-10-19 at 8:04 PM UTC
Originally posted by Meikai The demographics which make up the republican base are the most likely to adopt (whites, christians, men), but I can't find any evidence that they're actually republicans. Plenty of whites and christians and men who are democrats. I think it's pretty safe to say that there are plenty who do care once you're born though, and would just prefer to see adoption and voluntary acts of charity be the means by which children are dealt with (as opposed to abortion and involuntary taxation). *shrug*
Preference has no bearing on reality. Nobody is gonna adopt more kids. It's not any kind of solution to the problem. Funding public healthcare is.
