User Controls
Poll: Drink driving?
- No drinks before drive
- One drink ok its not a lot
-
Two is not a big deal
- There or four I'm an alcoholic okay
- Exactly five
-
Six or more drinks I hate pedestrians
- Twelve or more I hate equestrians
Drinking and driving?
-
2020-09-30 at 4:08 AM UTCHow do uou feel about it??d?
-
2020-09-30 at 4:23 AM UTCLike my dad always says just close one eye and you will be fineThe following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2020-09-30 at 4:25 AM UTCits an epidemic and we need more traffic police
-
2020-09-30 at 4:27 AM UTC
-
2020-09-30 at 4:28 AM UTCedited for privacy
-
2020-09-30 at 4:30 AM UTC3 or 4 ismt too many. Just gotta get a cup of coffee in me, do a couple jumping jacks, wait for the GHB to wear off.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2020-09-30 at 5:05 AM UTCwell, i dont trust most people when theyre intoxicated.
ive never driven sober though, and probably never will. cars are gay anyways. -
2020-09-30 at 5:08 AM UTC
-
2020-09-30 at 5:30 AM UTCI have a portable breathalyzer(LEO quality one not flea market bullshit) so I keep it in check. I am guilty of whipping my golf cart around under the influence though, so tempting when you live only a couple blocks away from 24/7 Wafflehouse & Wal-Mart etc.
-
2020-09-30 at 10:59 PM UTConly queers keep count of how much thry drunk like people with small penis keep measurements of their penis.
-
2020-09-30 at 11:01 PM UTC
Originally posted by G I have a portable breathalyzer(LEO quality one not flea market bullshit) so I keep it in check. I am guilty of whipping my golf cart around under the influence though, so tempting when you live only a couple blocks away from 24/7 Wafflehouse & Wal-Mart etc.
LOL wow you are such a scumbag. Get it together gramps. -
2020-09-30 at 11:03 PM UTCIt isnt fair to penalize those involved in traffic violations more heavily just because they happened to be under the influence at the time. Drunk drivers who are responsible and capable drivers even whilst inebriated sometimes become involved in accidents through no fault of their own and face harsh penalties such as revoked licenses and jail time even though they weren't at fault and wouldn't have crashed had it not been for irresponsible driving imposed on them by the other driver.
-
2020-09-30 at 11:04 PM UTC
Originally posted by UR_stepmoms_TITTIES It isnt fair to penalize those involved in traffic violations more heavily just because they happened to be under the influence at the time. Drunk drivers who are responsible and capable drivers even whilst inebriated sometimes become involved in accidents through no fault of their own and face harsh penalties such as revoked licenses and jail time even though they weren't at fault and wouldn't have crashed had it not been for irresponsible driving imposed on them by the other driver.
I didn't read this whole thing but just from a glance I can tell that you are a fuck boy who should've been aborted decades ago. -
2020-09-30 at 11:14 PM UTC
Originally posted by MexicanMasterRace I didn't read this whole thing but just from a glance I can tell that you are a fuck boy who should've been aborted decades ago.
yeah well you're mexican so you probably drive a secondhand nissan altima with a rosary hanging from the rearview mirror and a faded memorial decal for your Tio Lopez who died in 2009 on the rear window. also you work three jobs and probably live in a 2 bedroom house with 12 other relatives and only like 7 of them speak english -
2020-09-30 at 11:16 PM UTC
Originally posted by UR_stepmoms_TITTIES yeah well you're mexican so you probably drive a secondhand nissan altima with a rosary hanging from the rearview mirror and a faded memorial decal for your Tio Lopez who died in 2009 on the rear window. also you work three jobs and probably live in a 2 bedroom house with 12 other relatives and only like 7 of them speak english
Yeah I didn't read this one either. Just glazed over it, and I have to say, i am not impressed. -
2020-09-30 at 11:19 PM UTC
-
2020-09-30 at 11:28 PM UTC
Originally posted by UR_stepmoms_TITTIES It isnt fair to penalize those involved in traffic violations more heavily just because they happened to be under the influence at the time. Drunk drivers who are responsible and capable drivers even whilst inebriated sometimes become involved in accidents through no fault of their own and face harsh penalties such as revoked licenses and jail time even though they weren't at fault and wouldn't have crashed had it not been for irresponsible driving imposed on them by the other driver.
Fair point. I've read on this a little bit. If any alcohol was involved, regardless of fault, its marked as an alcohol related accident and the alcohol person gets the blame.
Kinda like covid deaths and pre-existing conditions, with the big difference being that with the traffic accidents, the alcohol had nothing to do with it.
Either way, its probably always a better idea to not drive drunk, but it's also not nearly as risky as it's made out to be, relative to the risk involved in driving to begin with.
There are millions of people who drive home from bars every night and never get a DUI, and they likely drive just fine.
I bet the rate of getting into a fatal alcohol related crash per times people drive intoxicated, as a whole, is minuscule. It's just one of those things that seems so tragic when it's to blame for a fatality, but nobody gives a shit that there are way more fatal traffic accidents not involving alcohol, and that driving is a risk either way.
We drive around with drunk people every day and never even know it.
In summary, I HEAVILY ENCOURAGE drunk driving and support a mandatory MINIMUM blood alcohol content to be able to drive legally.
