User Controls
Poll: Should the age of consent should be lowered to 11
-
Yes
- Zanick ,
- lannie wasnt pretending to be a girl for three years. hes pretending to be a boy now ,
- lannies loose labia longs for the laptop lactation from a laotian ladiboy ,
- lannies loose labia longs for the laptop lactation from a laotian ladiboy. ,
- lanny lost his virginity to the nigger janitor in the broom closet at his elementary school ,
- the little girl ,
- infinityshock lovingly allowed lard-ass lanney the luxury of lapping the loins-leviathan while the little lad larps as a laotian ladyboy lapdancer---.1011101--0-1--1--00.-111.01011-----0..-.1.1-0-.1011-11--01-001-----1.-.1--1----.-01---010110-0-(banned) ,
- infinityshock lovingly allowed lard-ass lanney the luxury of lapping the loins-leviathan while the little lad larps as a laotian ladyboy lapdancer---.1011101--0-1--1--00.-111.01011-----0..-.1.1-0-.1011-11--01-000-----1.-.1--1----.-01---010110-0-(banned)
-
Yes
- Indiana-Is-Eternal ,
- Sophie ,
- UR_stepmoms_TITTIES ,
- Misterigh ,
- lannie wasnt pretending to be a girl for three years... hes pretending to be a boy now ,
- infinityshock lovingly allowed lard-ass lanney the luxury of lapping the loins-leviathan while the little lad larps as a laotian ladyboy lapdancer---.1011101--0-1--1--00.-111.01011-----0..-.1.1-0-.1010-11--01-001-----1.-.1--0----.-01---010110-0-(banned)
-
Sure
- Kev ,
- lannie wasnt pretending to be a girl for three years. hes pretending to be a boy now. ,
- lannies loose labia longs for the laptop lactation from a laotian ladyboy ,
- infinityshock lovingly allowed lard-ass lanney the luxury of lapping the loins-leviathan while the little lad larps as a laotian ladyboy lapdancer---.1011101--0-1--1--00.-111.01011-----0..-.1.1-0-.1010-11--01-001-----1.-.1--1----.-01---010110-0-(banned) ,
- infinityshock lovingly allowed lard-ass lanney the luxury of lapping the loins-leviathan while the little lad larps as a laotian ladyboy lapdancer---.1011101--0-1--1--00.-111.01010-----0..-.1.1-0-.1010-11--01-001-----1.-.1--1----.-01---010110-0-(banned)
-
Why not
- netstat ,
- Grylls ,
- infinitysh0ck lovingly allowed lard-ass lanny the luxury of lapping the loins-leviathan while the little lad larps as a laotian ladyboy lapdancer---.1011111--0-1--1--00.-101.01011-----0..-.1.1-0-.1010-11--01-001-----0.-.1--0----.-01---010110-0-(banned) ,
- infinityshock lovingly allowed lard-ass lanney the luxury of lapping the loins-leviathan while the little lad larps as a laotian ladyboy lapdancer---.1011101--0-1--1--00.-111.01011-----0..-.1.1-0-.1010-11--01-001-----0.-.1--0----.-01---010110-0-(banned) ,
- l a n n y - l a r p s - a s - a - l a o t i a n - l a d y b o y - d o i n g - l a p d a n c e s - o n - l e z b i a n - l e p r e c h a u n s - l o v e - l a n c e s.
Should the age of consent be lowered to 11
-
2020-09-24 at 11:48 PM UTCobsessive compulsive disorder about things you cnat control and that always did and will exist is a mentwl disorder. its cqlled ocd moron.
-
2020-09-25 at 12:48 AM UTC
Originally posted by Grylls Yeah the odds are getting shorter too
Do you know what odds actually reflect? It is not some group of wizards who have a wand that creates a number that is realistic. It is a business that knows how to get half of the people to bet one side and half of the people to bet the other side. They charge a 10% vig to the winners as the hand them the losers money. All it means when the odds are in faovor of soemthing with a book is that more people have bet more money on one side of the bet than the other. Books do not want that. So they change the odds to encourage future bets to bet against the majority. To put it short and sweet buttercup, odds mean even less than polls in an election and it is a mattter of record how well the polls did four years ago. -
2020-09-25 at 1:02 AM UTC
-
2020-09-25 at 1:08 AM UTC
-
2020-09-25 at 1:10 AM UTCI voted for the first Yes like most.
-
2020-09-25 at 3:37 PM UTCThe following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2020-09-25 at 3:39 PM UTCedited for privacyThe following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2020-09-25 at 3:46 PM UTC
-
2020-09-25 at 4:09 PM UTC
-
2020-09-25 at 4:12 PM UTC
Originally posted by Speedy Parker Do you know what odds actually reflect? It is not some group of wizards who have a wand that creates a number that is realistic. It is a business that knows how to get half of the people to bet one side and half of the people to bet the other side. They charge a 10% vig to the winners as the hand them the losers money. All it means when the odds are in faovor of soemthing with a book is that more people have bet more money on one side of the bet than the other. Books do not want that. So they change the odds to encourage future bets to bet against the majority. To put it short and sweet buttercup, odds mean even less than polls in an election and it is a mattter of record how well the polls did four years ago.
Clearly odds mean SOMETHING as you're not gonna make a living betting on huge favorites with weak little payouts, but nonetheless the huge favorites give you those small payouts for a reason- because they usually win. -
2020-09-25 at 4:16 PM UTC
Originally posted by mmQ Clearly odds mean SOMETHING as you're not gonna make a living betting on huge favorites with weak little payouts, but nonetheless the huge favorites give you those small payouts for a reason- because they usually win.
In sports you are exactly right. However the fact sports betters are more informed than about the wager than the average voter makes it more likely that the odds will reflect the outcome. If enough idiots bet on a longshot it can become the favorite. -
2020-09-25 at 4:36 PM UTC
Originally posted by Speedy Parker In sports you are exactly right. However the fact sports betters are more informed than about the wager than the average voter makes it more likely that the odds will reflect the outcome. If enough idiots bet on a longshot it can become the favorite.
Fair point. At the end of the day this election really does feel like its gonna be really close one way or the other. -
2020-09-25 at 4:48 PM UTC
-
2020-09-25 at 4:53 PM UTC
Originally posted by Wariat you dont even know the definition of pedophilia and what it is. learn the actual definition instead of using proles terminology before throwing the word around first, and what the fuk are you? a Nobody.
IM NOT A PEDOPHILE IM A HEBEPHILE AND SHES 9000 YEARS OLD
shut the fuck up you child molester that got deported bitch. Just because you call a spade a hoe doesn't mean its not a fucking spade
-
2020-09-25 at 5:02 PM UTC
-
2020-09-25 at 5:04 PM UTC
-
2020-09-25 at 5:32 PM UTC
Originally posted by the man who put it in my hood IM NOT A PEDOPHILE IM A HEBEPHILE AND SHES 9000 YEARS OLD
you truly need to get an education id much rather believe eople with degrees like clinicians and psychs over some deranged tranny fucking fsggits.
shut the fuck up you child molester that got deported bitch. Just because you call a spade a hoe doesn't mean its not a fucking spade
-
2020-09-25 at 5:33 PM UTCagain open a book and get educated for ocne shit for brains. too much crack is desteoying your brain cells. just because proles use certain terms thst make no sense doesnt mean anything because proles are proles like you and your mommy and daddy.
-
2020-09-25 at 5:36 PM UTCfind me clinicials, psychologists, psychiatrists or others or some reputbale books or works who define hephephilia as pedophilia otherwise your discussion and point of view is mute.
-
2020-09-25 at 5:37 PM UTC
Originally posted by Speedy Parker There have been many lopsided election results in our history. You should read about it sometime.
Most arent. hillary won only 2% more votes than trump, obama won only 4% more than romney, 6% more than mccain, george bush won 2% more than kerry and a whopping 0.5% more than al gore in the 2000 election, and thats where i stop reading.
so for the past 20 years the most lopsided election was the one in 2008 where obama got 53 vs mccains 46. wow....... what a landslide.
