User Controls
Poll: Ban all pedophiles from niggasin.space?
-
Yes, ban them
- MexicanMasterRace ,
- larrylegend8383 ,
- Grylls ,
- Octavian ,
- Obbe ,
- rabbitweed ,
- pEEpEEpOOpOO ,
- Technologist ,
- Lanny ,
- street_carp ,
- risk ,
- -SpectraL ,
- AngryOnion
- No, don't ban them
Should we ban all pedophiles from this website?
-
2020-09-25 at 2:21 AM UTC
-
2020-09-25 at 2:25 AM UTC
Originally posted by MexicanMasterRace There's no discussion to be had here. One side is wrong, the other is right.
Your side is wrong. Your side is the side of peodohiles.
Casually observing that society collectively makes some fucking stupid decisions about what's normal and okay is not the same as taking the side of pedophiles, but I can understand your confusion. You'd actually have to think to realize my argument was a bit more nuanced than "pedophilia not bad lmao", and as you've implied you aren't here to think. -
2020-09-25 at 2:28 AM UTCChildren cannot consent to sex. Raping children is detrimental to society. Like people who have urges to start fires in buildings, or people who are prone to violent outbursts, people who want to have sex with children have a condition that needs to be controlled.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2020-09-25 at 2:28 AM UTCIf Meikai is really HTS I will feel hurt and betrayed
-
2020-09-25 at 2:32 AM UTC
Originally posted by Obbe Children cannot consent to sex. Raping children is detrimental to society. Like people who have urges to start fires in buildings, or people who are prone to violent outbursts, people who want to have sex with children have a condition that needs to be controlled.
This is all that needs to be said. Pedophilia is inherently harmful. Hence, pedophiles can go kill themselves. -
2020-09-25 at 2:34 AM UTC
Originally posted by Obbe Children cannot consent to sex. Raping children is detrimental to society. Like people who have urges to start fires in buildings, or people who are prone to violent outbursts, people who want to have sex with children have a condition that needs to be controlled.
I mean I agree, but that doesn't mean people who agree will continue to exist in perpetuity or that they will continue to be the majority in society. The DSM just reflects our views as a society, if there is any overlap with immutable moral truths it's purely coincidental. 🤷♀️
Originally posted by rabbitweed If Meikai is really HTS I will feel hurt and betrayed
Oh boy, do I have some bad news for you... -
2020-09-25 at 2:39 AM UTC
-
2020-09-25 at 2:41 AM UTC
-
2020-09-25 at 2:41 AM UTC
Originally posted by rabbitweed You were the only person from totse who hadn't changed their name.
Now it's just me and fucking Spectral. Great.
I was HTS-Noob on totse so it kinda changed. Maybe I'll switch back one day, but my post count is 6969 (haha funny sex number) so I opted to make a new account as to not upset the balance. -
2020-09-25 at 2:41 AM UTCYou guys should change your username to include more Mexican racial superiority
-
2020-09-25 at 2:42 AM UTC
Originally posted by Meikai I mean I agree, but that doesn't mean people who agree will continue to exist in perpetuity or that they will continue to be the majority in society. The DSM just reflects our views as a society, if there is any overlap with immutable moral truths it's purely coincidental. 🤷♀️
Oh boy, do I have some bad news for you…
Nobody said anything about immutable moral truths. I agree that classifying a condition as a "mental illness" is semantics. I was just making a statement about the real present, not some hypothetical future scenario that doesn't really matter to us. -
2020-09-25 at 2:45 AM UTC
Originally posted by Meikai I was HTS-Noob on totse so it kinda changed. Maybe I'll switch back one day, but my post count is 6969 (haha funny sex number) so I opted to make a new account as to not upset the balance.
Oh you're the tranny guy
I thought you were some otaku dude who just stumbled here.
Why are gay guys so obsessed with Elfen Lied? -
2020-09-25 at 2:45 AM UTC
Originally posted by infinityshock lovingly allowed lard-ass lanny the luxury of lapping the loins-leviathan while the little lad larps as a laotian ladyboy lapdancer---.-.-.-...---............-....-.............-.......................................................(banned) youre delusional.
taking a nigger cock in your ass, and enjoying it, is not a characteristic of a superior species.
keep in mind, your species is not the same species as humans
"Infintelygay3r"
Lol -
2020-09-25 at 2:46 AM UTC
-
2020-09-25 at 2:52 AM UTC
Originally posted by Obbe Nobody said anything about immutable moral truths. I agree that classifying a condition as a "mental illness" is semantics. I was just making a statement about the real present, not some hypothetical future scenario that doesn't really matter to us.
It matters in the context of "pedophilia is in the DSM", which is the only context it should be interpreted in - something's current presence in the DSM is a meaningless criteria by which to judge how society will interpret its morality in the future. Saying "P for pedophilia will never be part of LGBT+ because pedophilia is in the DSM" is silly, because the G in LGBT+ was itself in the DSM at one point. Whether or not it is an immutable truth that children can't consent and that pedophilia is morally wrong matters naught to the DSM, because the DSM is only concerned with what we as a society consider aberrant today. If a great many people are convinced otherwise, pedophilia stops being aberrant and joins its betabetic brethren in the Almighty Acronym. -
2020-09-25 at 2:52 AM UTC
Originally posted by Meikai It matters in the context of "pedophilia is in the DSM", which is the only context it should be interpreted in - something's current presence in the DSM is a meaningless criteria by which to judge how society will interpret its morality in the future. Saying "P for pedophilia will never be part of LGBT+ because pedophilia is in the DSM" is silly, because the G in LGBT+ was itself in the DSM at one point. Whether or not it is an immutable truth that children can't consent and that pedophilia is morally wrong matters naught to the DSM, because the DSM is only concerned with what we as a society consider aberrant today. If a great many people are convinced otherwise, pedophilia stops being aberrant.
Ugh. -
2020-09-25 at 2:52 AM UTCHTS confirmed pedo
-
2020-09-25 at 3:17 AM UTC
Originally posted by Meikai It matters in the context of "pedophilia is in the DSM"
It really doesn't matter whether pedophilia is in the DSM or not, or whether it is LGBT+ or not, what matters is how people act. I would rather live in a world where pedophiles get the treatment they need to control their condition and the opportunity to live a normal life than a world where these people are either ostracized or preying upon children.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2020-09-25 at 3:19 AM UTC
Originally posted by Obbe I would rather live in a world where pedophiles get the treatment they need to control their condition and the opportunity to live a normal life than a world where these people are either ostracized or preying upon children.
So what you're saying is you'd be okay with the P being in LGBT+? Is that you, Mr. Epstein? -
2020-09-25 at 3:20 AM UTC
