User Controls
Enough has been said about Kavanaugh to disqualify his appointment
-
2020-09-20 at 6:01 PM UTC
Originally posted by MORALLY SUPERIOR BEING 2020 IV: Intravenous Soyposting I'd refer you to the investigation that was done.
While we're on the question, how many women did Mohammad and his followers rape?
They had a whole set of rules about it didn't they? Like Genghis Khan.
Ok, I didn't think you had any substance to your assertion
The investigation was not done. Also, not concluding there is not enough evidence to support a conviction =/= complete exoneration DOESN'T EXIST
For instance, I have been charged with numerous things which I did in fact do, however my jooish lawyer convinced the courts this is not the case. Does this mean the police, crown prosecutors etc were all lying?
I don't know what your point is but you seem confused -
2020-09-20 at 6:22 PM UTC
Originally posted by Sudo Ok, I didn't think you had any substance to your assertion
The investigation was not done. Also, not concluding there is not enough evidence to support a conviction =/= complete exoneration DOESN'T EXIST
For instance, I have been charged with numerous things which I did in fact do, however my jooish lawyer convinced the courts this is not the case. Does this mean the police, crown prosecutors etc were all lying?
I don't know what your point is but you seem confused
Your guilt has no bearing on this. Your argument fails. -
2020-09-20 at 6:25 PM UTCTIL that unless something was proven in a court of law, it didn't happen.
HILARY IS EXONERATED!!!! -
2020-09-20 at 6:32 PM UTC
Originally posted by Sudo TIL that unless something was proven in a court of law, it didn't happen.
HILARY IS EXONERATED!!!!
She can't be exonerated. You have to be accused of or cahrged with something to be exonerated. There have been no charges and no official investigations. INB4COMEYBLAHBLAHBLAH -
2020-09-20 at 7 PM UTC
Originally posted by Speedy Parker She can't be exonerated. You have to be accused of or cahrged with something to be exonerated. There have been no charges and no official investigations. INB4COMEYBLAHBLAHBLAH
no you dont you fucking idiot. Are you really trying to say the word "exonerated" can be used in purely legal context? You are wrong and stupid too. Why would you type this? Why are you so stupid and wrong about everything? -
2020-09-20 at 7:26 PM UTC
Originally posted by Sudo no you dont you fucking idiot. Are you really trying to say the word "exonerated" can be used in purely legal context? You are wrong and stupid too. Why would you type this? Why are you so stupid and wrong about everything?
Exoneration—A person has been exonerated if he or she was convicted of a crime and, following a post-conviction re-examination of the evidence in the case, was either: (1) declared to be factually innocent by a government official or agency with the authority to make that declaration; or (2) relieved of all the consequences of the criminal conviction by a government official or body with the authority to take that action. The official action may be: (i) a complete pardon by a governor or other competent authority, whether or not the pardon is designated as based on innocence; (ii) an acquittal of all charges factually related to the crime for which the person was originally convicted; or (iii) a dismissal of all charges related to the crime for which the person was originally convicted, by a court or by a prosecutor with the authority to enter that dismissal. The pardon, acquittal, or dismissal must have been the result, at least in part, of evidence of innocence that either (i) was not presented at the trial at which the person was convicted; or (ii) if the person pled guilty, was not known to the defendant and the defense attorney, and to the court, at the time the plea was entered. The evidence of innocence need not be an explicit basis for the official action that exonerated the person. A person who otherwise qualifies has not been exonerated if there is unexplained physical evidence of that person's guilt.
http://www.law.umich.edu/special/exoneration/Pages/glossary.aspx -
2020-09-20 at 9:29 PM UTC
Originally posted by Speedy Parker Exoneration—A person has been exonerated if he or she was convicted of a crime and, following a post-conviction re-examination of the evidence in the case, was either: (1) declared to be factually innocent by a government official or agency with the authority to make that declaration; or (2) relieved of all the consequences of the criminal conviction by a government official or body with the authority to take that action. The official action may be: (i) a complete pardon by a governor or other competent authority, whether or not the pardon is designated as based on innocence; (ii) an acquittal of all charges factually related to the crime for which the person was originally convicted; or (iii) a dismissal of all charges related to the crime for which the person was originally convicted, by a court or by a prosecutor with the authority to enter that dismissal. The pardon, acquittal, or dismissal must have been the result, at least in part, of evidence of innocence that either (i) was not presented at the trial at which the person was convicted; or (ii) if the person pled guilty, was not known to the defendant and the defense attorney, and to the court, at the time the plea was entered. The evidence of innocence need not be an explicit basis for the official action that exonerated the person. A person who otherwise qualifies has not been exonerated if there is unexplained physical evidence of that person's guilt.
http://www.law.umich.edu/special/exoneration/Pages/glossary.aspx
that is from a law textbook you lying idiot
Nice try. Literally open a dictionary dumbfuck -
2020-09-20 at 9:31 PM UTC
Originally posted by Speedy Parker Exoneration—A person has been exonerated if he or she was convicted of a crime and, following a post-conviction re-examination of the evidence in the case, was either: (1) declared to be factually innocent by a government official or agency with the authority to make that declaration; or (2) relieved of all the consequences of the criminal conviction by a government official or body with the authority to take that action. The official action may be: (i) a complete pardon by a governor or other competent authority, whether or not the pardon is designated as based on innocence; (ii) an acquittal of all charges factually related to the crime for which the person was originally convicted; or (iii) a dismissal of all charges related to the crime for which the person was originally convicted, by a court or by a prosecutor with the authority to enter that dismissal. The pardon, acquittal, or dismissal must have been the result, at least in part, of evidence of innocence that either (i) was not presented at the trial at which the person was convicted; or (ii) if the person pled guilty, was not known to the defendant and the defense attorney, and to the court, at the time the plea was entered. The evidence of innocence need not be an explicit basis for the official action that exonerated the person. A person who otherwise qualifies has not been exonerated if there is unexplained physical evidence of that person's guilt.
Originally posted by Sudo that is from a law textbook you lying idiot
Nice try. Literally open a dictionary dumbfuck
No shit dumb ass. If you want to be exnorated it is a legal thing. -
2020-09-20 at 9:34 PM UTCThis thread is embarrassing. And I don't just mean the OP, but like 90% of the content related to this thread is just... cringe. Truly the Niggas In Spaceship is the Intergalactic Short Bus.
-
2020-09-20 at 9:43 PM UTC
-
2020-09-20 at 11:51 PM UTC
-
2020-09-20 at 11:52 PM UTCNote how these same people call Bill Clinton a pedophile despite never having any rape/pedo allegations.
-
2020-09-20 at 11:52 PM UTC
-
2020-09-21 at 7:33 AM UTCThe following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2020-09-21 at 4:24 PM UTC
-
2020-09-21 at 4:36 PM UTC
-
2020-09-21 at 4:49 PM UTC
-
2020-09-21 at 4:56 PM UTC
-
2020-09-21 at 5:14 PM UTC
-
2020-09-21 at 5:57 PM UTC
