User Controls
Scientists Predict There's 90% Chance Civilization Will Collapse Within 'Decades'
-
2020-09-17 at 3:34 PM UTC
Factcheck.org – A Fraudulent "Fact Check" Site Funded By Biased Political Group
If you wanted to use a devious method to deceive people who are trying to differentiate between truth and lies on the Internet how would you do it? If you were extremely devious and had no conscience, you might set up a Web site with some official and unbiased sounding name that claims to be the encyclopedia of truth to be used as a tool for anyone who has the same biased view and wants to make believe to "back it up" with what they would like you to think is "indisputable fact."
That is exactly what Web sites like factcheck.org are. They are biased, politically motivated propaganda Web sites, manned and funded by biased political organizations who set up the sites for the sole purpose of deviously "backing up" the political arguments of those who hold the same views that they do. It's kind of like you have a friend who is in on your lie, and you use him to back up your story and don't tell anyone else he is your friend.
Just because they use a name that implies unbiased assessments, doesn't mean that they provide them. You can call your Web site anything you want. I can set up a web site called thetruth.org or realfacts.com or stopthelies.org and post any kind of biased political propaganda I want on it. The name means nothing. And in the case of sites like factcheck.org, the name is intentionally misleading and deceptive. But it isn't the only so called "fact check" site that is a fraud. There are others.
Think about it. Would you rely on any particular Web site to get the "truth?" Anyone honest would tell you that you should NOT rely solely on them to get your facts. You should get them by considering many different and sources, with different points of view and opinions and arrive at what you believe to be the truth by using your own God given senses. Only con artists purport to be the de facto source of truth.
If you look behind the scenes at these phony "fact check" sites, you find that they are funded by organizations with political biases. You must always ask yourself. Who is writing about this so-called "truth." Who funds the site and pays their expenses. What are the origins and history of the funders and who are they associated with. In the case of factcheck.org they receive their funding from the liberal Annenberg Foundation.
The Annenberg Foundation was originally founded by Walter J. Annenberg, a conservative who supported Ronald Reagan. However, when Walter Annenberg died, his family took over the management of the foundation and it took a turn to the far left and has ties to radical left individuals such as Bill Ayers and his friend and fellow left wing radical collegue Barack Obama. How is factcheck.org associated with these people:
To start, Ayers was the key founder of the Chicago Annenberg Challenge, which was a Chicago public school reform project from 1995 to 2001. Upon its start in 1995, Obama was appointed Board Chairman and President of the Chicago Annenberg Challenge. Geesh, that alone connects all three. Well, it branches out even more from there.
Ayers co-chaired the organization’s Collaborative, which set the education policies of the Challenge. Oddly enough, Obama was the one who was authorized to delegate to the Collaborative in regards to its programs and projects. In addition to that, Obama often times had to seek advice and assistance from the Ayer’s led Collaborative in regards to the programmatic aspects of grant proposals. Ayers even sat on the same board as Obama as an “ex officio member”. They both also sat together on the board of the CAC’s Governance Committee. Obama and Ayers were two parts of a group of four who were instructed to draft the bylaws that would govern the CAC. Keep in mind that the “A” in CAC is for Annenberg, the owners of FactCheck.org. The funding for Ayer’s projects and those of his cronies was approved by Board Chair, Barack Obama.
http://theswash.com/liberty/who-fact-checks-factcheck-org
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2923825/posts -
2020-09-17 at 3:41 PM UTCedited for privacy
-
2020-09-17 at 3:49 PM UTC
Originally posted by netstat Compressing the graph by three orders of magnitude on the left side like that obfuscates the fact that large temperature changes preceding anthro influence occurred over millions of years, while the current warming spike you see on the right end of the x axis represents only about a hundred years.
You realize that spike is a projected value, a prediction, not the actual temperature? -
2020-09-17 at 3:54 PM UTCedited for privacy
-
2020-09-17 at 4:02 PM UTC
Originally posted by netstat
https://www.carbonbrief.org/factcheck-what-greenland-ice-cores-say-about-past-and-present-climate-change
You're now reposting shitty propaganda based on ice core samples from ONE location and missing the most recent 70 years worth of temperature estimates.
Okay, lets look at more locations.
This first record is from Spain, based on the mercury content in a peat bog, as published in Science, 1999, vol. 284, for the most recent 4,000 years. Note that this graph is backwards, with present day on the left:
This next record is from the Central Alps, based on stalagmite isotopes, as published in Earth and Planteary Science Letters, 2005, vol. 235, for the most recent 2,000 years:
And here is the greenland data from before:
As for missing the latest 115 years (not 70, where did you get that number from, the greenland ice core record ends at 1905). we can append the thermometer record starting from 1905 to fill the gap, here it is:
Still looks very natural to me, following long term trends like before, its not at all dramatic or unnatural. temperature increase has stagnated since the turn of the millennium, it will start dropping very soon.
For reference, this is the thermometer record we appended:
-
2020-09-17 at 4:50 PM UTCedited for privacy
-
2020-09-17 at 5:23 PM UTC
Originally posted by netstat Why didn't you just link to the article on the conspiracy site you pulled those images and descriptions verbatim from and tried to pass off as your own argument?
Look back at the beginning of the thread, i posted the link to the globalresearch article numerous times and people repeatedly refused to read it, so i decided to spoon feed you the points.
If scientific studies and its related data is "conspiracy stuff" then i dont know what to do for you. nothing i posted had anything to do with any conspiracy nor did any of my sources talk about any conspiracy. instead of using pejorative buzzwords with no real meaning, explain exactly what is wrong with the data.
You complained the greenland ice core data is only one location, i gave you more. do you want vostok ice core data too?
oh wait, being spoon fed offends you. read the article, vostok is also in it.Read the article I linked if you want to learn something, otherwise keep up the disingenuous argumentation and continue buying into misrepresented data.
You pasted my source and then wrote this, im a little confused. i assume you are referring to a different link. if so, post it right now but i wanna hear your counterpoint and i expect any article you post to back it up. -
2020-09-17 at 7:15 PM UTCedited for privacyThe following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2020-09-17 at 7:32 PM UTCWho did the weather reports 500 million years ago? Keith Richards?
-
2020-09-17 at 8:58 PM UTCThe following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2020-09-17 at 10:53 PM UTCGas Companies Are Abandoning Their Wells, Leaving Them to Leak Methane Forever
Just one orphaned site in California could have emitted more than 30 tons of methane. There are millions more like it
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2020-09-17/abandoned-gas-wells-are-left-to-spew-methane-for-eternity?srnd=premium -
2020-09-17 at 10:56 PM UTC
-
2020-09-17 at 11:02 PM UTC
Originally posted by MexicanMasterRace Why not? Scientists in the mid 1800s predicted global warming from engines.
Science won't change. It never does.
scientists from the mid 1800s also recomended lobotomy for anyone suffering your condition/disease.
Originally posted by MexicanMasterRace Also a reminder that this is exactly what Hitler did. Defunded the railroads and steel plants and sold them to private corporations. Previously they were publicly owned. Not government owned. Real socialism you know? That money went towards their national healthcare system. Shortly after begining to privatize Germany, Hitler increased requirements for their NHS, making many intelligible for coverage.
This is the real trickle down economics
-
2020-09-17 at 11:09 PM UTC
Originally posted by ORACLE Nobody in the universe has ever denied that the earth's climate changes on it's own or that it may have been warmer at some point in the past, so I don't know if you are illiterate or what but you're just refusing to engage with the point.
Which is that human industrial activity is causing accelerated climate change at a rate that is not in line with the natural, historic rate of change of the climate.
rohingya doesnt understand the scientifique process.
until and unless you have 3 similar earths, one with humans in it, one without, amd the 3rd one acting as control, and observed climate change more in the earth with humans in it,
any claims that humans changed this earths climate are just pure kiddy phantasies and wishful homoerotic speculations. -
2020-09-18 at 12:56 AM UTC
Originally posted by Obbe Gas Companies Are Abandoning Their Wells, Leaving Them to Leak Methane Forever
Just one orphaned site in California could have emitted more than 30 tons of methane. There are millions more like it
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2020-09-17/abandoned-gas-wells-are-left-to-spew-methane-for-eternity?srnd=premium
Filthy ghouls. -
2020-09-18 at 1:33 AM UTC
-
2020-09-18 at 5:30 AM UTC
Originally posted by vindicktive vinny
rohingya doesnt understand the scientifique process.
until and unless you have 3 similar earths, one with humans in it, one without, amd the 3rd one acting as control, and observed climate change more in the earth with humans in it,
any claims that humans changed this earths climate are just pure kiddy phantasies and wishful homoerotic speculations.
Mental illness and also University of Mongoloid graduate doesn't understand statistics. -
2020-09-18 at 6:06 AM UTC
Originally posted by Kev That is also false, lets look at a more recent part of the graph, the past few thousand years instead of million:
I see nothing unusual or unnatural about todays warming period. the temperature grew at a faster in the medieval warming period than today, without indistrualization. every peak preceding it was even more dramatic than the one before it.
AGAIN FUCKING ILLITERACY. HOLY SHIT YOU MONGOLOID IDIOT RETARD. How long ago does this graph end? It's written on there faggot, read it.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2020-09-18 at 11:50 AM UTCThe latest crisis: Low-income students are dropping out of college this fall in alarming numbers
https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2020/09/16/college-enrollment-down/ -
2020-09-18 at 1:36 PM UTC
Originally posted by Obbe The latest crisis: Low-income students are dropping out of college this fall in alarming numbers
https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2020/09/16/college-enrollment-down/
Good, they won't get an overpriced liberal indoctrination.
