50 Years of Failed Scientific Apocalyptic Predictions

1. 2020-09-11 at 5:55 AM UTC

   #41
   

   Speedy Parker Black Hole

   Originally posted by netstat You made a thread ostensibly trying to claim that scientific predictions were wrong then referenced a whole bunch of non-scientific sources. So what, this is a bait and switch that I'm somehow a dumbass for not picking up on? You don't really mean science made bad predictions even though you explicitly say this, you actually mean 'the machine' whatever the fuck that is misled people? Nah, I think you're just a moron who has a hard time keeping your argument straight, who wanders all over the place while trying to dodge facts you don't like.

   
   OK so the news sources that you support and draw on for reliable information are wrong? Because if you look at the sources it's all from well known left leaning publications. It's the same thing as today. You are just to egotistical to admit you have been lied to and believed the lie. Even when faced with proof they have been lying for over 50 years. Man you must be a real mess inside.
2. 2020-09-11 at 6:05 AM UTC

   #42
   

   HTS highlight reel

   Originally posted by Speedy Parker
   
   (MORE)…

   
   
   
   

   Originally posted by Speedy Parker

   
   I will say upfront I'm not as much of a climate change/global warming skeptic as Speedy, but can someone explain to me why this Time article is referencing a 2.7°F cooling trend that occurred from "the 1940s" to the time it was written, and why a 0.38°C (0.68°F, if my math serves) increase over a similar span of time afterward (1981 to 2010) is alarming? Sounds like the warming trend over the last 40 years hasn't even accounted for 1/3rd of the cooling that occurred over the 40 years that immediately preceded it. 🤔
   
   Someone please tell me why this isn't... like... a thing? Tell me why this isn't real please. I don't wanna be a climate denying boomer.
   The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!

   • -SpectraL
3. 2020-09-11 at 6:07 AM UTC

   #43
   netstat African Astronaut
   edited for privacy
4. 2020-09-11 at 6:15 AM UTC

   #44
   netstat African Astronaut
   edited for privacy
   The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!

   • HTS
5. 2020-09-11 at 6:18 AM UTC

   #45
   netstat African Astronaut
   edited for privacy
6. 2020-09-11 at 6:29 AM UTC

   #46
   

   Speedy Parker Black Hole

   Originally posted by netstat Also the number in that article is off by like an order of magnitude
   
   

   
   Says you, why don't you publish an article on that theory.
7. 2020-09-11 at 6:40 AM UTC

   #47
   netstat African Astronaut
   edited for privacy
8. 2020-09-11 at 8:33 AM UTC

   #48
   

   vindicktive vinny Black Hole

   Originally posted by netstat Don't need to, that data is freely available in any of the recent IPCC reports.

   
   have you compared the data thry release today with those that they released 6 years ago ?
9. 2020-09-11 at 11 AM UTC

   #49
   

   -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
   We also need to compare the data with the data for the past six thousand years.
10. 2020-09-11 at 12:57 PM UTC

    #50
    

    Obbe Alan What? [annoy my right-angled speediness]
    Alternative thread title:
    
    
11. 2020-09-11 at 1:12 PM UTC

    #51
    

    Speedy Parker Black Hole
    50 years of bullshit and some of these idiots still line up for another helping.
12. 2020-09-11 at 1:15 PM UTC

    #52
    Soyboy 2020 IV: Intravenous Soyposting African Astronaut [scrub the quick-drying deinonychus]

    Originally posted by Speedy Parker 50 years of bullshit and some of these idiots still line up for another helping.

    
    Science is a religion for a lot of these people. When you criticise a scientist's predictions or a test a theory, they take it like you are insulting their religion.
13. 2020-09-11 at 1:17 PM UTC

    #53
    

    Speedy Parker Black Hole

    Originally posted by MORALLY SUPERIOR BEING 2020 IV: Intravenous Soyposting Science is a religion for a lot of these people. When you criticise a scientist's predictions or a test a theory, they take it like you are insulting their religion.

    
    I must be. Because it would take an unshakable faith to believe this bullshit.
14. 2020-09-11 at 1:23 PM UTC

    #54
    Soyboy 2020 IV: Intravenous Soyposting African Astronaut [scrub the quick-drying deinonychus]

    Originally posted by Speedy Parker I must be. Because it would take an unshakable faith to believe this bullshit.

    
    Haven't you noticed that the beliefs of a lot of people have nothing to do with reality.
15. 2020-09-11 at 1:25 PM UTC

    #55
    

    Speedy Parker Black Hole

    Originally posted by MORALLY SUPERIOR BEING 2020 IV: Intravenous Soyposting Haven't you noticed that the beliefs of a lot of people have nothing to do with reality.

    
    I sure have...
16. 2020-09-11 at 4:14 PM UTC

    #56
    netstat African Astronaut
    edited for privacy
17. 2020-09-11 at 4:46 PM UTC

    #57
    

    Speedy Parker Black Hole

    Originally posted by netstat It sure would be nice to be able to handwave away any information I don't like, ignore research and cherrypick newspaper articles to uphold my views but unfortunately I'm not as prone to delusion as many.

    
    Cherry pick? It's more like picking up nuts that keep falling from the trees.