Originally posted by Speedy Parker
50 years of failed BS and you want to argue like that?
Why don't you make yourself useful in life?
To be fair, Mack makes some salient points in that scene and I actually kinda agree with him. It was a compliment as much as it was also me memeing on you.
Originally posted by HTS
To be fair, Mack makes some salient points in that scene and I actually kinda agree with him. It was a compliment as much as it was also me memeing on you.
It was lost on me as I don't watch TV programs. Only reruns of old shit streaming when I want to fall asleep.
LOL That is kind of my take on a lot of science. Most of it is theory, a good portion is working theory, and the rest is paid for misinformation. In 200 years people will surely laugh about what we accept as scientific fact in many areas.
The so-called "experts" insisted up and down in the '50s and '60s that Thalidomide was perfectly safe, calling everyone who disagreed with them uneducated fools, and they fought for years in the courts, while they created a worldwide catastrophe, with the result of over 20,000 deformed babies. Then, when they were exposed for the frauds and buffoons they really were, they just said, "whoops... our bad", and continued to demand respect, credibility and obedience. Lots more of those very same clowns around today, and in much larger numbers, and they are exponentially more dangerous to society than they were back then.
Originally posted by -SpectraL
The so-called "experts" insisted up and down in the '50s and '60s that Thalidomide was perfectly safe, calling everyone who disagreed with them uneducated fools, and they fought for years in the courts, while they created a worldwide catastrophe, with the result of over 20,000 deformed babies. Then, when they were exposed for the frauds and buffoons they really were, they just said, "whoops… our bad", and continued to demand respect, credibility and obedience. Lots more of those very same clowns around today, and in much larger numbers, and they are exponentially more dangerous to society than they were back then.
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
Originally posted by netstat
Your thread title says 50 years of failed scientific predictions, the things you have cited are not scientific predictions. I was encouraging you to look up what the most authoritative scientific body has actually predicted and claimed so you can compare it against reality but evidently you're too dense.
The title said herp derp
Is that how you get your information? Do you just read the healine and say, "Teh article say herp derp"? You missed the point even after it was pointed out to you.