DNA clears man who served 37 years in prison for 1983 crime...

1. 2020-08-28 at 1:32 PM UTC

   #21
   Jiggaboo_Johnson Black Hole

   Originally posted by Wariat no it twkes almsot nothing to comvict someone in Amerika jsut hearsay or one perosn saying somehting and lying or having a grudge. on the other hand it twkes much evidence not jsut innocence to be elt out ever.

   
   non sequitur.
2. 2020-08-28 at 1:37 PM UTC

   #22
   Wariat Marine/Preteen Biologist
   dna isnt enough it usually twkes multiple tiers of evidence. or placimg the other perosn at the crime whose dna was found instead.
3. 2020-08-28 at 1:41 PM UTC

   #23
   Jiggaboo_Johnson Black Hole

   Originally posted by Wariat dna isnt enough it usually twkes multiple tiers of evidence. or placimg the other perosn at the crime whose dna was found instead.

   
   Which is basically what I said, DNA evidence alone isn't enough to convict or exonerate someone..or shouldn't be.
4. 2020-08-28 at 1:50 PM UTC

   #24
   

   STER0S Space Nigga [the disappointingly unanticipated slab]
   i wonder what his first real meal was
5. 2020-08-28 at 1:50 PM UTC

   #25
   

   STER0S Space Nigga [the disappointingly unanticipated slab]
   i wonder what his first real meal was after getting out of hell.
6. 2020-08-28 at 1:56 PM UTC

   #26
   Jiggaboo_Johnson Black Hole

   Originally posted by STER0S i wonder what his first real meal was after getting out of hell.

   
   As for former volunteer prison visitor my experience was they want to go to Macdonalds.
7. 2020-08-28 at 2:01 PM UTC

   #27
   

   Sudo Black Hole [my hereto riemannian peach]

   Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson Which is basically what I said, DNA evidence alone isn't enough to convict or exonerate someone..or shouldn't be.

   
   Why not? If a lady is found dead in the woods with my semen all over her and no reasonable explanation as to why my semen would be everywhere around her, I'd say thats enough to convict.
   
   Likewise, if it shows someone elses semen, I think its a leap to say the original suspect was there holding them down while someone else raped her
8. 2020-08-28 at 2:09 PM UTC

   #28
   WellHung Black Hole

   Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson DNA doesn't prove or disprove much.
   
   DNA evidence is just that, evidence, not proof.
   
   If the Jizz found on said dead person doesn't match the person who is locked up for the crime…it doesn't necessarily mean he is innocent…it just means she could have fucked someone else earlier and the murderer used a joe bag.

   
   but it means he shouldnt have been justifiably convicted...because there was no evidence to do so.