User Controls
Scientists Predict There's 90% Chance Civilization Will Collapse Within 'Decades'
-
2020-08-15 at 4:18 PM UTC
Originally posted by Obbe Thread isn't about the earth being ok thousands of years from now, it is about civilization collapsing.
what is collapsing civilization? warming periods or cooling periods? if the former, did civilization collapse 1000 years ago during the last one? if the latter, did civilization collapse 500 years ago? -
2020-08-15 at 4:22 PM UTC
Originally posted by Kev what is collapsing civilization? warming periods or cooling periods? if the former, did civilization collapse 1000 years ago during the last one? if the latter, did civilization collapse 500 years ago?
What last one?
Did you even notice your graph doesn't have any labels?
It's just a picture of a squiggly line. -
2020-08-15 at 4:31 PM UTC
Originally posted by MORALLY SUPERIOR BEING 2020 IV: Intravenous Soyposting What last one?
Did you even notice your graph doesn't have any labels?
It's just a picture of a squiggly line.
https://www.globalresearch.ca/climate-science-observations-versus-models/16865
It is the same as the one i referred you to earlier, you fucking idiot.
See the name of the link? 3000 BC - present. notice the numbers on the bottom say -3000 on teh very left and 2000 on the very right? what do you think those numbers mean?
now that thats out of the way, look at the rightmost spike, that is todays warming period. what is the most recent spike before that? look on the bottom and notice it is close to where it says 1000 AD. -
2020-08-15 at 4:37 PM UTC
Originally posted by Kev https://www.globalresearch.ca/climate-science-observations-versus-models/16865
It is the same as the one i referred you to earlier, you fucking idiot.
See the name of the link? 3000 BC - present. notice the numbers on the bottom say -3000 on teh very left and 2000 on the very right? what do you think those numbers mean?
now that thats out of the way, look at the rightmost spike, that is todays warming period. what is the most recent spike before that? look on the bottom and notice it is close to where it says 1000 AD.
If the numbers at the bottom are years the graph ends around 1990, 30 years ago. -
2020-08-15 at 4:57 PM UTC
Originally posted by MORALLY SUPERIOR BEING 2020 IV: Intravenous Soyposting If the numbers at the bottom are years the graph ends around 1990, 30 years ago.
Read. the. fucking. article.
2000 BC - 2008 AD.
I linked that graph too early in the thread but it too slipped your mind.
i am not interested in having the same conversation over and over again. go back and read the first few pages.
there is a reason the ice core data only goes to 1900 AD, luckily we can append the thermometer record to it as was done with the above graph. -
2020-08-15 at 5:35 PM UTCThe following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2020-08-15 at 6:02 PM UTC
-
2020-08-15 at 8:03 PM UTC
-
2020-08-15 at 8:17 PM UTC
Originally posted by ORACLE https://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus/
notice they only talk about the past century without taking the billions of years of history into account.
the climate was not born 100 years ago. -
2020-08-15 at 8:33 PM UTC
-
2020-08-15 at 8:50 PM UTC
-
2020-08-15 at 8:56 PM UTC
Originally posted by ORACLE ???
I dont understand your confusion. did you read your own link you just gave me?
Originally posted by -SpectraL It's called cherry picking data.
exactly, propaganda 101. i can scientifically prove that in the last 6 hours, the temperature went up from 50f to 90f outside, which is alarmingly fast, in a week we will all be boiling dead!
except yesterday and today are within most peoples memory spans so nobody would fall for that. centuries that nobody will live to see on the other hand...The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2020-08-15 at 8:59 PM UTC
-
2020-08-15 at 9:06 PM UTC
-
2020-08-15 at 9:08 PM UTCIt's kinda interesting watching Obbe and Faggot losing to some retarded boomer.
-
2020-08-15 at 9:17 PM UTC
Originally posted by ORACLE Retard what does "the climate wasn't born 100 years ago" fucking mean?
It means your link that says the climate has been warming for the past 100 years means jack shit considering the climate has been warming and cooling for billions of years. what is special about the past 100 years? -
2020-08-15 at 9:38 PM UTC
Originally posted by ORACLE Retard what does "the climate wasn't born 100 years ago" fucking mean?
H means scope, dummy. When you look at data, you can have a narrow scope, or a broad scope. If you want to push a partisan agenda, you look at the narrow scope. When you want to look at the truth, you look at the broad scope. This is not rocket science, buddy. -
2020-08-15 at 9:56 PM UTC
This video goes into how past changes in the earth's atmospheric chemistry have been insanely destructive. -
2020-08-15 at 11:04 PM UTC
Originally posted by ORACLE Classic example ^ of a retarded pseud who has never once studied economics. You can tell he didn't even take a 101 course in a college setting, or failed it.
Only mongoloids with subnormal brain function would say this who never read/understand/remember the CONSTANT reminder of "ceteris paribus" in Econ 101 courses whenever they explained simple supply curves, which is supposed to remind you that everything being explained is just a series of toy models that are being used to explain isolated concepts and NONE of which apply in real markets, because no, you can't hold everything else constant.
But actually learning to model markets would take hard work and study. So just substitute actual knowledge with parroting some retarded alt right YouTuber's less-than-101 take on economy.
^ BET.
bangladeshi economic theory,The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2020-08-16 at 1:57 AM UTC
Originally posted by Kev It means your link that says the climate has been warming for the past 100 years means jack shit considering the climate has been warming and cooling for billions of years. what is special about the past 100 years?
It has one chart showing indisputable evidence of climate change since we started collecting rigorous climate data. How does that invalidate anything said below the fucking flavor text?
