User Controls
Massive and aesthetic ANFO explosion at Beirut Port
-
2020-08-07 at 5:13 AM UTC
Originally posted by Speedy Parker .
You are a man with tits and a broken dick who lives in a basement and has no real knowledge. We had this system in the 1/13th HQ battery before it was mothballed. Its called the W54 "Davy Crockett" Atomic Projectile and is the smallest nuclear warhead ever recorded.. The last 3 detonations in the video are the W54. Notice the shrooms?
Conventional explosives of a large enough yield and even volcanoes create mushroom clouds. It's not something unique to nukes, see:
It's fluid dynamics. So saying "there was no mushroom cloud, therefore it wasn't a nuke" is stupid. One because there is a mushroom cloud, and two because the presence of a mushroom cloud would not prove it was a nuke even if it had been.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2020-08-07 at 5:38 AM UTC
Originally posted by HTS Conventional explosives of a large enough yield and even volcanoes create mushroom clouds. It's not something unique to nukes, see:
It's fluid dynamics. So saying "there was no mushroom cloud, therefore it wasn't a nuke" is stupid. One because there is a mushroom cloud, and two because the presence of a mushroom cloud would not prove it was a nuke even if it had been.
That's not a shroom that's a spore. It's a whole different scale. -
2020-08-07 at 5:52 AM UTC
-
2020-08-07 at 5:59 AM UTC
-
2020-08-07 at 6:05 AM UTC
Originally posted by Speedy Parker Bullshit
I mean total bullshit
*whistles innocently*
The video you posted was 3 completely unrelated nuclear tests edited in for effect, in the same manner as all cringey American documentary film making (especially as it related to weapons and war).
But I'm sure you have vast personal knowledge and experience to explain this discrepancy.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2020-08-07 at 6:09 AM UTC
Originally posted by HTS
*whistles innocently*
The video you posted was 3 completely unrelated nuclear tests edited in for effect, in the same manner as all cringey American documentary film making (especially as it related to weapons and war).
But I'm sure you have vast personal knowledge and experience to explain this discrepancy.
Do you know what an operational test is? Do you realize the Crocket could be fitted with many different sized warheads? No of course not. And do you know why you don't know that? Becsue you are a man with tits and a broken dick who lives in a basement. -
2020-08-07 at 6:14 AM UTCImagine unironically linking American documentaries and not realizing that everything about them is incredibly fake and pretty much solely focused on spectacle - from the narration to the footage used - all to keep the HFCS-fattened, mentally weak pharmaceutical fueled American audience members like yourself mildly interested in something that one could theoretically confuse for being educational.
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2020-08-07 at 6:20 AM UTC
Originally posted by Speedy Parker Do you know what an operational test is? Do you realize the Crocket could be fitted with many different sized warheads?
The W54 was a variable sub-kiloton yield warhead design but no iteration had an expected yield larger than the Beirut explosion - least of all the warheads designed for use with the Davy Crockett.
(Which clocked in at a piddling 0.02 kilotons, if literally all of the documentation about them in existence is to be believed.) -
2020-08-07 at 6:22 AM UTCYeah the worst are the ones hosted by some guy dressed up in cheap tac gear and sunglasses forcing their voices down an octave or two and trying to hide their erection when the bomb bay footage startsThe following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2020-08-07 at 6:29 AM UTCIf you want proof that the footage used wasn't of the Davy Crockett though, here it is: at least one of the videos is from Upshot, a completely unrelated series of nuclear artillery tests with yields around 15 kilotons, 7ish times the estimates of the Beirut explosion and 700ish times the yield of a Davy Crockett.
Retard. -
2020-08-07 at 6:42 AM UTC
Originally posted by aldra Yeah the worst are the ones hosted by some guy dressed up in cheap tac gear and sunglasses forcing their voices down an octave or two and trying to hide their erection when the bomb bay footage starts
DENEL's (South African arms company) videos are aesthetic as fuck though:
-
2020-08-07 at 7:09 AM UTC
Originally posted by aldra And at the country's primary port. In the middle of a food supply crisis.
https://www.breakingisraelnews.com/156261/in-2018-netanyahu-threatened-to-blow-up-that-very-missile-site-in-beirut/In an address to the - - UN in 2018, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu warned that the location of Tuesday’s massive explosion in Beirut was in the vicinity of the “secret sites” where Hezbollah converted “inaccurate projectiles” into “precision guided missiles that can target deep inside Israel.”
https://www.timesofisrael.com/netanyahu-hezbollah-shuttered-beirut-missile-sites-after-un-speech/
The sites were about 5 miles south so I don't know how related but
COINCIDENCE -
2020-08-07 at 2:05 PM UTC
Originally posted by HTS The W54 was a variable sub-kiloton yield warhead design but no iteration had an expected yield larger than the Beirut explosion - least of all the warheads designed for use with the Davy Crockett.
(Which clocked in at a piddling 0.02 kilotons, if literally all of the documentation about them in existence is to be believed.)
.79 -
2020-08-07 at 2:07 PM UTCThe following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2020-08-09 at 9:31 PM UTC
-
2020-08-09 at 11:40 PM UTC
