User Controls
Scientists Predict There's 90% Chance Civilization Will Collapse Within 'Decades'
-
2020-08-05 at 12:40 AM UTCMuch sooner than that. In fact, it's already upon us.
-
2020-08-05 at 12:54 AM UTC
Originally posted by Splam I don't think they ever managed to do so Speedy.
Imagine a nuclear bomb. It releases a bunch of bad chemicals right. And we can use it to fuck up the climate.
If there's a tool that allows you to fuck up the climate, theoretically there must be a tool that allows you to fix the climate.
Imagine a big flower bomb that restores oxygen to the air and nitrogen to the soil or something.
I don't know if they have or haven't but if they did ask yourself, "Do I think they would use it for purely altruistic purposes?" -
2020-08-05 at 2:46 PM UTC
Originally posted by Splam Yes there is, 'tard. If it suits our needs, its healthy for us. If it kills us, it's bad. Same would apply to other species, especially species we may benefit from.
do you have any supporting evidences that prove the presence of humans on this planet is healthy for this earth. -
2020-08-05 at 2:59 PM UTC
Originally posted by Splam If we can control exactly how much co2, ho2, methane, ozone, etc. is in the atmosphere
Thats a big if. If you were god, you could change the weather. luckily, you are a puny mass of nothingness that will live shortly and die like everything else.Actually, if the sun decides to heat up, there is something we can do about it.
Delusions of grandeur. -
2020-08-05 at 10:35 PM UTCEveryone keeps complaining that this has been the hottest summer on record, instead of enjoying the coolest summer of the next 30 years.
-
2020-08-06 at 12:25 AM UTC
-
2020-08-06 at 4:27 AM UTC
Originally posted by vindicktive vinny do you have any supporting evidences that prove the presence of humans on this planet is healthy for this earth.
The term health cannot apply to the earth. The earth doesn't care if we litter it with plastic, for all we know, it's plastic that it wants.
A "healthy" climate is by definition a climate suited to our needs. The climate, during earth's 4 billion year history, has never been stable. In the end, it's us that must adapt, not the climate.
Anyhow you're still retarded for not comprehending what it means by having a "healthy" climate. It cannot refer to the earth. The earth has no pulse. -
2020-08-06 at 4:56 AM UTC
-
2020-08-06 at 1:31 PM UTC
Originally posted by Splam The term health cannot apply to the earth. The earth doesn't care if we litter it with plastic, for all we know, it's plastic that it wants.
A "healthy" climate is by definition a climate suited to our needs. The climate, during earth's 4 billion year history, has never been stable. In the end, it's us that must adapt, not the climate.
Anyhow you're still retarded for not comprehending what it means by having a "healthy" climate. It cannot refer to the earth. The earth has no pulse.
why should something thats suitable for our needs and conducive to our propagation be considered 'healthy' when we ourselves arent necessarily healthy for this planet ? -
2020-08-06 at 1:33 PM UTChave not enjoyed this summer at all, whther its the warmest or coolest, havent enjoyed spring either
-
2020-08-06 at 10:16 PM UTC
Originally posted by vindicktive vinny why should something thats suitable for our needs and conducive to our propagation be considered 'healthy' when we ourselves arent necessarily healthy for this planet ?
Ding exactly what I tell environmentalists. If they cared so much, they'd better off themselves.
In reality they only care about themselves and the utopian idea of a 100% stable climate that we never have to adapt to. Not once do they consider what the rock we're living on wants. And more likely than not, that is for the cancerous growth that is humanity to be gone!The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2020-08-06 at 10:20 PM UTCIt seems like people more or less admit the climate is getting warmer, and human activity is the cause.
-
2020-08-06 at 10:21 PM UTC
-
2020-08-06 at 10:25 PM UTC
-
2020-08-07 at 1:02 AM UTC
Originally posted by Splam Ding exactly what I tell environmentalists. If they cared so much, they'd better off themselves.
In reality they only care about themselves and the utopian idea of a 100% stable climate that we never have to adapt to. Not once do they consider what the rock we're living on wants. And more likely than not, that is for the cancerous growth that is humanity to be gone!
"The planet" isn't sentient and has no desires. -
2020-08-07 at 1:32 AM UTC
-
2020-08-07 at 1:44 AM UTC
-
2020-08-07 at 1:05 PM UTC
The last fully intact ice shelf in the Canadian Arctic has collapsed, losing more than 40% of its area in just two days at the end of July, researchers said on Thursday.
The Milne Ice Shelf is at the fringe of Ellesmere Island, in the sparsely populated northern Canadian territory of Nunavut.
“Above normal air temperatures, offshore winds and open water in front of the ice shelf are all part of the recipe for ice shelf break up,” the Canadian Ice Service said on Twitter when it announced the loss on Sunday.
“Entire cities are that size. These are big pieces of ice,” said Luke Copland, a glaciologist at the University of Ottawa who was part of the research team studying the Milne Ice Shelf.
The shelf’s area shrank by about 80 square kilometers. By comparison, the island of Manhattan in New York covers roughly 60 square kilometers.
“This was the largest remaining intact ice shelf, and it’s disintegrated, basically,” Copland said.
https://m.hindustantimes.com/world-news/canada-s-last-fully-intact-arctic-ice-shelf-collapses/story-sIcnbxddqNCXcmbwJrmBFK.html -
2020-08-07 at 1:53 PM UTClol hindustan times?
-
2020-08-07 at 1:55 PM UTCStan was a really famous guy over there.
