User Controls
Scientists Predict There's 90% Chance Civilization Will Collapse Within 'Decades'
-
2020-08-04 at 5:17 AM UTCWith that said, just because we can't predict it, doesn't mean we shouldn't take certain precautions to maintain a healthy climate. However shutting down the country permanently like corona did for a while there, as the climate alarmists want, is just insane.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2020-08-04 at 5:24 AM UTC
Originally posted by Splam With that said, just because we can't predict it, doesn't mean we shouldn't take certain precautions to maintain a healthy climate. However shutting down the country permanently like corona did for a while there, as the climate alarmists want, is just insane.
I dont think any sensible person says we shouldnt crack down on pollution or deforestation, but predicting the weather (much less changing it) is not possible. should we burn less fossil fuels? probably, but i am yet to hear of a better alternative. so far, their best solution seems to be cutting down entire forests to use them as biofuel, euphemistically called "green energy" so they dont have to burn as much oil from the ground.
do i even need to go on a long rant to drive the point home of how fucking retarded that is?
i dont know about you but i would rather we deplete some tar deep underground than our source of life. -
2020-08-04 at 6:25 AM UTC
Originally posted by Kev ok, let us take it at face value. why then are temperatures not correlating?
Great, so we and our grandchildren will never live to corroborate your prophecy? typical.
make a 10 year, 5 year, even 1 year prediction and see what happens. climate alarmists have been doing it for decades. in the 1970s they thought we would be in an ice age by 2000 based on the trends at the time, in 1990 they said snow would be a thing of the past by 2008, in 2000 they said the earth would be gone in 20 years. all sorts of scary hockey stick graphs that all ended up way off reality.
observing the climate and recording the data is a hard science. but predicting it, as we have seen so many times, is impossible.
Are you really this dumb?
My 10 year prophecy is that CO2 will continue to accumulate.
Is that hard to understand?
Just cos Al Gore is a crook and Greta Thurnberg likes shoving herring up her ass doesn't invalidate the simple fact that the chemistry of Earth's atmosphere is changing.
This fact obviously frightens you. -
2020-08-04 at 7:02 AM UTC
Originally posted by MORALLY SUPERIOR BEING 2020 IV: Intravenous Soyposting Are you really this dumb?
My 10 year prophecy is that CO2 will continue to accumulate.
Maybe you will be right, maybe you wont. remember in 2000 they made apocalyptic predictions for 2020 based on the trend at the time. little did they know that the temperature would stagnate from then on, even drop. for all you know the CO2 will stop accumulating.
and you didnt answer my question, why didnt temperatures correlate with the increased co2? did you look at the graph? the middle ages warming period was a lot warmer than today.Is that hard to understand?
no but anyone would be a fool to believe it. remember the 2020 prediction made in 2000, it was far off course from reality now that we are alive to see 2020. the climate will change (no shit), but who is to say which direction it will change? we have no control of it, is that hard to understand?Just cos Al Gore is a crook and Greta Thurnberg likes shoving herring up her ass doesn't invalidate the simple fact that the chemistry of Earth's atmosphere is changing.
This fact obviously frightens you.
What a genius observation, the climate is changing! yeah, no shit, it always has been. i accept it and also accept that there is nothing i can do about it except adapt. crying about an ice age wont help me stay warm in it, nor will crying about the current interglacial period keep me cool.
you are projecting your fear onto me.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2020-08-04 at 7:06 AM UTC
Originally posted by Kev Maybe you will be right, maybe you wont. remember in 2000 they made apocalyptic predictions for 2020 based on the trend at the time. little did they know that the temperature would stagnate from then on, even drop. for all you know the CO2 will stop accumulating.
Why would that happen?
We know where the CO2 that is accumulating is coming from - burning oil, coal and gas.
If we keep burning oil, coal and gas at the current rate, CO2 will keep accumulating at the current rate.
Simple cause and effect shouldn't cause anyone this level of mental disturbance. -
2020-08-04 at 7:08 AM UTC
Originally posted by MORALLY SUPERIOR BEING 2020 IV: Intravenous Soyposting Why would that happen?
We know where the CO2 that is accumulating is coming from - burning oil, coal and gas.
If we keep burning oil, coal and gas at the current rate, CO2 will keep accumulating at the current rate.
Simple cause and effect shouldn't cause anyone this level of mental disturbance.
fucking christ, i ask for the third time:and you didnt answer my question, why didnt temperatures correlate with the increased co2? did you look at the graph i posted? the middle ages warming period was a lot warmer than today.
answer this time. thanks. -
2020-08-04 at 7:13 AM UTC
Originally posted by Kev fucking christ, i ask for the third time:
answer this time. thanks.
I'm sorry, you are all over the place with your arguments and I find them a little hard to follow.
I don't know anything about the medieval warm period, except that it probably wasn't caused by increases in CO2. There are many things that affect the climate, and we can't do anything about most of them, for instance if the sun decides to heat up a little and insolation increases for a few years there is nothing we can do about it besides adjust.
However that is not the same thing as burning geological amounts of fossil fuels and then shrugging when CO2 starts to rise, as if we couldn't possibly understand how those two things could possibly be linked. -
2020-08-04 at 7:14 AM UTCThe following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2020-08-04 at 10:54 AM UTC
Originally posted by HTS The X and Y axes are just labelled X axis and Y axis.
Its from this page. https://www.globalresearch.ca/climate-science-observations-versus-models/16865
The X axis is 1000 years, it is the global temperature from 2000 BC to 2008 AD.
The same graph from that page, 2000 BC to 1900 AD. -
2020-08-04 at 10:56 AM UTCThis is just fear mongering to get the public to accept agends 2030 and the NWO
-
2020-08-04 at 11:01 AM UTC
Originally posted by MORALLY SUPERIOR BEING 2020 IV: Intravenous Soyposting There are many things that affect the climate, and we can't do anything about most of them, for instance if the sun decides to heat up a little and insolation increases for a few years there is nothing we can do about it besides adjust.
You have figured it out! we have a winner!However that is not the same thing as burning geological amounts of fossil fuels and then shrugging when CO2 starts to rise, as if we couldn't possibly understand how those two things could possibly be linked.
Except they are not linked, just look at the temperature graph again, notice the COOLING trend and tell me they are somehow linked. every warming peak we have had before (before we had fossil fuels) has been hotter than this one. the further you go back in time, the worse they were.
if you are worried about burning too much fossil fuel, which is a reasonable concern, why oh why are you worried about WARMING of all things? -
2020-08-04 at 12:36 PM UTCdark ages are coming
-
2020-08-04 at 12:37 PM UTC
-
2020-08-04 at 1:05 PM UTC
-
2020-08-04 at 2:54 PM UTCGlobal warming is our fault durrr
-
2020-08-04 at 3:44 PM UTC
Originally posted by Splam With that said, just because we can't predict it, doesn't mean we shouldn't take certain precautions to maintain a healthy climate. However shutting down the country permanently like corona did for a while there, as the climate alarmists want, is just insane.
theres no such thing as a 'healthy climate'
id like to see you define a healthy climate. -
2020-08-04 at 5:53 PM UTCedited for privacy
-
2020-08-05 at 12:34 AM UTCActually, if the sun decides to heat up, there is something we can do about it.
It's called weather control. Supposedly government research agencies have been onto it since the 60's.
If we can control exactly how much co2, ho2, methane, ozone, etc. is in the atmosphere, and where it is, we could not only create perfect climates to suit our needs, we would never have to worry about global warming again.
Imagine Mondays are the rain day. Tuesday and Wednesdays you get snow for skiing. Then Thursday to Sunday is warm and sunny. Or something like it's always cold on the mountains. Always sunny at the beach.
Putting research on eliminating our emissions etc. is the wrong way to go. The proper way to go is looking forward. How the hell can we control this thing (the climate) which in reality is the thing that has control over us.
Originally posted by vindicktive vinny
theres no such thing as a 'healthy climate'
id like to see you define a healthy climate.
Yes there is, 'tard. If it suits our needs, its healthy for us. If it kills us, it's bad. Same would apply to other species, especially species we may benefit from. -
2020-08-05 at 12:36 AM UTC
Originally posted by Splam Actually, if the sun decides to heat up, there is something we can do about it.
It's called weather control. Supposedly government research agencies have been onto it since the 60's.
If we can control exactly how much co2, ho2, methane, ozone, etc. is in the atmosphere, and where it is, we could not only create perfect climates to suit our needs, we would never have to worry about global warming again.
Imagine Mondays are the rain day. Tuesday and Wednesdays you get snow for skiing. Then Thursday to Sunday is warm and sunny. Or something like it's always cold on the mountains. Always sunny at the beach.
Putting research on eliminating our emissions etc. is the wrong way to go. The proper way to go is looking forward. How the hell can we control this thing (the climate) which in reality is the thing that has control over us.
If they could do that could they not also fabricate actual global warming and blame it cow farts and other ridiculous shit? -
2020-08-05 at 12:39 AM UTCI don't think they ever managed to do so Speedy.
Imagine a nuclear bomb. It releases a bunch of bad chemicals right. And we can use it to fuck up the climate.
If there's a tool that allows you to fuck up the climate, theoretically there must be a tool that allows you to fix the climate.
Imagine a big flower bomb that restores oxygen to the air and nitrogen to the soil or something.
