User Controls
Cops raid St. Louis gun-mansion lawyers who blamed "white people" for standoff with BLM mob
-
2020-07-22 at 5:46 PM UTC
Originally posted by Technologist This is why.
From Missouri statutes:
https://revisor.mo.gov/main/OneSection.aspx?section=571.030
Law of necessity. In order to prevent loss of life or limb, it was necessary to break said law.
That is if the traditional self defence law fails you.
But breaking down a gate more than justified self defence. Even "fighting words" may justify self defence. -
2020-07-22 at 5:48 PM UTCThe prosecutor, Kim Gardner, thinks she is the mayor of St. Louis and is always stirring up shit around here.
I can't blame those individuals for letting an angry mob know that they would be very mistaken (after breaking down a gate and trespassing on a private street and private property) that my house was not the place to start any bullshit. -
2020-07-22 at 5:50 PM UTC
Originally posted by Splam Law of necessity. In order to prevent loss of life or limb, it was necessary to break said law.
That is if the traditional self defence law fails you.
But breaking down a gate more than justified self defence. Even "fighting words" may justify self defence.
Yeah, not saying I agree with them being prosecuted, that’s why I was looking into it more thoroughly today. But, that is the statute the state attorney is using as a reason to prosecute. -
2020-07-22 at 5:53 PM UTCI know the Governor is against prosecution and, I believe, has mentioned that he will clear them if convicted.
-
2020-07-22 at 6:04 PM UTCI heard that prosecutor let all the rioters out of jail and that she’s being investigated for misconduct
Prosecutor should not be an elected official. Should be appointed by the state ag
Why you have all these prosecutors pandering to the criminals. city’s are pure shit holes... -
2020-07-22 at 6:13 PM UTC
Originally posted by Archer513 I’m just waiting on all the white boys to jump in
That’s what the lefties really want. The whole basis of their bullshitbis white supremacy groups.
I’d just let these mofo’s burn their cities down
They are, along with the corporations that coddle these communist chimpout crews -
2020-07-22 at 6:36 PM UTC
Originally posted by Technologist This is why.
From Missouri statutes:
https://revisor.mo.gov/main/OneSection.aspx?section=571.030
I'd imagine that refers to a public place not on your own property...if it was taken literally you wouldn't be allowed to go to the gun range without being guilty of "brandishing a weapon" according to that statute...whoever wrote it did a piss poor job of qualifying/clarifying it as it could be "stretched" to any situation.
I doubt that would stand up in court vs a person defending themselves and their property on their own property. -
2020-07-22 at 6:41 PM UTCMissouri is an open carry state. You are legal to walk down the street carrying an AR-15 and a six gun strapped to your leg if you so desire.
Personally, I'd like to see that law repealed as I'm sure it is part of the problem, especially in our cities. -
2020-07-22 at 6:53 PM UTC
Originally posted by stl1 Missouri is an open carry state. You are legal to walk down the street carrying an AR-15 and a six gun strapped to your leg if you so desire.
Personally, I'd like to see that law repealed as I'm sure it is part of the problem, especially in our cities.
Not really relevant. Carrying and brandishing are two different things...but again on your own private property it shouldn't matter what the fuck you do with it, especially when faced with a threat as they were.
Still being charged and being found guilty are 2 different things too. They'll probably end up suing when the courts kick it out and getting a payday out of this. -
2020-07-22 at 6:57 PM UTCIt is relevant to the fact that the McCluskey's were aware of the law and thus further worried about their safety because of the likelihood of a protester carrying a weapon.
-
2020-07-22 at 6:57 PM UTCProtecting your own property isn't "threatening" in any legal sense I have ever heard of.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2020-07-22 at 7:02 PM UTC
Originally posted by stl1 It is relevant to the fact that the McCluskey's were aware of the law and thus further worried about their safety because of the likelihood of a protester carrying a weapon.
Again carrying and brandishing are completely different things. You can open carry here in Texas but you can't brandish a weapon...so no it's not relevant mentioning the open carry law. -
2020-07-22 at 7:03 PM UTC
-
2020-07-22 at 9:11 PM UTC
-
2020-07-22 at 9:32 PM UTC
-
2020-07-23 at 12:24 AM UTCthis just in :
St. Louis Prosecutor's Office Busted Altering Evidence; Reassembled Non-Operable McCloskey Pistol To Classify As Lethal
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/patricia-mccloskey-pistol-was-non-operable-prop-so-prosecutors-office-ordered-it
lolololllooolo -
2020-07-23 at 12:49 AM UTC
-
2020-07-23 at 1:14 AM UTC
-
2020-07-23 at 2:31 AM UTC
-
2020-07-23 at 5:28 PM UTC
