User Controls

Seattle announces they are going to take back CHOP zone.

  1. Speedy Parker Black Hole
    Originally posted by MexicanMasterRace Of what? You're just getting riled up for no reason because people are exercising their right to protest.

    You do not have the right to protest. They are not protesting they are rioting.
  2. Originally posted by Speedy Parker You do not have the right to protest. They are not protesting they are rioting.



    This is what the government tries to do EVERY major protest. Paint others with their light.

    The fact is some people will always riot no matter what the protest is about.

    The same people protesting are not the same ones rioting. And besides, random civilians arent the ones who are supposed to uphold the law. Cops are. And they're abusing that power nationwide.
  3. Technologist victim of incest
    Originally posted by MexicanMasterRace Of what? You're just getting riled up for no reason because people are exercising their right to protest.

    It makes them “uncomfortable”.
  4. Speedy Parker Black Hole
    Originally posted by MexicanMasterRace

    This is what the government tries to do EVERY major protest. Paint others with their light.

    The fact is some people will always riot no matter what the protest is about.

    The same people protesting are not the same ones rioting. And besides, random civilians arent the ones who are supposed to uphold the law. Cops are. And they're abusing that power nationwide.

    You do not have the right to protest.
  5. Originally posted by Speedy Parker You do not have the right to protest.

  6. First Amendment: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
  7. I guess the second ammendment is the only one that matters, huh?
  8. Originally posted by MexicanMasterRace I guess the second ammendment is the only one that matters, huh?

    Well how else do you think we are supposed to be able to fight for the other amendments?
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  9. Speedy Parker Black Hole
    Originally posted by MexicanMasterRace

    Show me in the U.S. Constition where I am wrong
  10. Archer513 African Astronaut
    Originally posted by MexicanMasterRace ; or the right of the people PEACEABLY to assemble
  11. Originally posted by frala Well how else do you think we are supposed to be able to fight for the other amendments?


    Bitch, do you see anybody fighting the government with guns? No. That whole 'militia to overthrow the government' thing might have worked in the 1700's but it does not work in the 2000's when the government has tanks, drones, sonic weapons, etc. Stuff you can't get and couldn't operate even if you could.

    Absolutely fucking nobody is overthrowing the government without also controlling the military. So what does the right to own guns really matter? You aren't overthrowing the government. You aren't going to be protecting your free speech with guns. This is idealistic John Locke shit that does not apply to the 21st century.

    Guns are exclusively for self defense, hunting/sport, and murder. That's what people use guns for. And the only reason you need them for self defense is because guns are legal in the first place. No guns, no reason to own one for self defense.
  12. Technologist victim of incest
    Originally posted by MexicanMasterRace Bitch, do you see anybody fighting the government with guns? No. That whole 'militia to overthrow the government' thing might have worked in the 1700's but it does not work in the 2000's when the government has tanks, drones, sonic weapons, etc. Stuff you can't get and couldn't operate even if you could.

    Absolutely fucking nobody is overthrowing the government without also controlling the military. So what does the right to own guns really matter? You aren't overthrowing the government. You aren't going to be protecting your free speech with guns. This is idealistic John Locke shit that does not apply to the 21st century.

    Guns are exclusively for self defense, hunting/sport, and murder. That's what people use guns for. And the only reason you need them for self defense is because guns are legal in the first place. No guns, no reason to own one for self defense.

    Pretty sure that was sarcasm from LaLa G-man!
  13. I couldn't tell, people actually say shit like that lol.
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  14. Speedy Parker Black Hole
    Originally posted by MexicanMasterRace I couldn't tell, people actually say shit like that lol.

    Because it's true
  15. Originally posted by Speedy Parker Because it's true

  16. aldra JIDF Controlled Opposition
    it was all fun and games until they turned up to the mayor's house
  17. Originally posted by aldra it was all fun and games until they turned up to the mayor's house

    They should've dragged out the mayor and killed him/her.
  18. aldra JIDF Controlled Opposition
    Originally posted by MexicanMasterRace They should've dragged out the mayor and killed him/her.

    would've been funny, but I don't know why they went after her anyway. she was the one keeping CHOP/CHAZ/whatever open, saying it was a 'summer of love' and 'democracy in action' and stuff
  19. Originally posted by frala Well how else do you think we are supposed to be able to fight for the other amendments?

    yea but without the first, you'd just ended up with means to fight for,

    but not the end in which to fight for.
  20. Originally posted by aldra would've been funny, but I don't know why they went after her anyway. she was the one keeping CHOP/CHAZ/whatever open, saying it was a 'summer of love' and 'democracy in action' and stuff



    Shows how small your understanding of this is.
Jump to Top