User Controls
Poll: Trump 2020?
- No
-
Fuck no
- Absolutely not
Trump on testing for the Coronavirus
-
2020-06-25 at 7:15 PM UTC
-
2020-06-25 at 7:16 PM UTC
-
2020-06-25 at 7:23 PM UTC
-
2020-06-25 at 8:11 PM UTC
-
2020-06-25 at 8:11 PM UTC
-
2020-06-26 at 1:27 AM UTC
-
2020-06-26 at 3:35 AM UTC
-
2020-06-27 at 1:51 PM UTC
Originally posted by MexicanMasterRace that's 79,000 in an entire year. Over 80k in winter only? Lol no.
When do you think most people get the flu? in the summer?Corona killed 120,000 in THREE MONTHS and that's with masks and with lockdowns.
Sweden didnt do a lockdown, neither did Japan or Iceland. Their fatality rates were not significantly different.Never mind that that was the highest recorded number since 2009. AND that's with 48 million infected, WITH a vaccine. America is at about 2.5 million RECORDED cases for COVID-19.
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/04/21/health/coronavirus-antibodies-california.htmlOn Monday, officials in Los Angeles County released preliminary results of a study that suggest roughly 4.1 percent of the county’s adult population has already had the coronavirus, which translates to between 221,000 and 442,000 people, factoring in adjustments for statistical margin of error.
That’s a much, much higher number than confirmed case counts indicate. (As of early Tuesday morning, the county had 13,816 cases.)
Los Angeles County. 10 million people, 4.1%, that means 410,000 people have contracted covid19.
The official death toll at time of writing was 617.
That is a fatality rate of 0.15%. the fatality rate of your average flu is between 0.10-0.20%. At the time, LA county had 13,816 confirmed cases but when they did this random testing the real number turned out to be 410,000. Thats 30 times higher infection rate than the media told you.
You say 2.5 million, when we time that by 30 we get 75 million. So 125000 deaths out of 75 million is a 0.17% fatality rate.
Of course, the numbers will be different depending on the area. When they did random testing in New york, 21% turned out to be infected.What the fuck do you think is going to happen when this spreads?
99.85% of the population will be just fine and 99% who will die from it will be chronically ill old people as we have seen in Italy https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8130479/99-patients-killed-coronavirus-Italy-existing-illnesses-study-finds.html and UK https://www.bbc.com/news/health-52308783 where that number was 91%.
The average age was 80. I think you and me and most of us will be just fine. -
2020-06-27 at 1:53 PM UTCHoly shit you have never taken a statistics class. Good job making up shit but that doesn't make it true.
-
2020-06-27 at 2 PM UTC
-
2020-06-27 at 2:20 PM UTC
Originally posted by Kev I posted the link, see for yourself. Are those scientists who conducted the random testing lying?
I didn't say that retard. I said you're interpreting the data wildly and incorrectly. You clearly don't know how to read this kind of data. I'm seriously thinking you did not take a statistics class in high school or at least college... not that I think you've graduated from either.
Tell me, did you? Or would you like me to explain in detail how utterly retarded you're being? -
2020-06-27 at 3:22 PM UTCWhen the clueless idiots say they are going to stop this virus, they are lying to you. This virus can't be stopped. Claiming they are going to stop this virus is as dishonest as them saying they are going to stop the common flu. They can't even do that with their bogus and dangerous "flu vaccine". Truth is, EVERYONE is going to get the COVID-19, and these utter fools are not going to stop it from accomplishing that. The sick, the well, the healthy, the not healthy, the old, the young, the vulnerable, the not vulnerable, the handicapped, the medical workers, the bankers, the poor, the rich... nobody can stop the virus from reaching the entirety of the population. These morons are flat out lying to you by claiming otherwise. You have a brain, use it.
-
2020-06-27 at 7:30 PM UTC
Originally posted by MexicanMasterRace I didn't say that retard. I said you're interpreting the data wildly and incorrectly.
You did not refute my math in any way. Demonstrate exactly what i "made up". You changed "made shit up" to "interpreting incorrectly". who knows what it will be in the third post.You clearly don't know how to read this kind of data. I'm seriously thinking you did not take a statistics class in high school or at least college… not that I think you've graduated from either.
https://fallacyinlogic.com/ad-hominem-fallacy/
https://fallacyinlogic.com/appeal-to-authority-fallacy/Tell me, did you? Or would you like me to explain in detail how utterly retarded you're being?
https://fallacyinlogic.com/ad-hominem-fallacy/
