User Controls
New surveillance footage shows Armed Robbery walking around construction site
-
2020-05-17 at 4:56 PM UTC*Ted Bundy waves*
-
2020-05-17 at 4:59 PM UTC
-
2020-05-17 at 5 PM UTCStar is upset that I outed him for being just as ignorant as a hood nigger lol.
Gonna have a long look in the mirror today huh star? -
2020-05-17 at 5 PM UTC
-
2020-05-17 at 5:02 PM UTC*Jeff Dahmer waves (and takes a bite out another person's buttocks)*
-
2020-05-17 at 5:03 PM UTC
-
2020-05-17 at 5:06 PM UTC
-
2020-05-17 at 5:10 PM UTC
-
2020-05-17 at 5:10 PM UTC
Originally posted by Technologist There is absolutely no proof that Arbery has robbed anyone. So it doesn’t really matter how many burglaries have been in that neighborhood.
You just never give up no matter how many times you are wrong. Way to go tiger. SMH
Robbery and Burglary are two separate offenses.
As shown by two separate video sources there was more than enough for probable cause to permit a citizens arrest for burglary as he clearly and without authority and with the intent to commit a felony or theft therein, entered and remained within an unoccupied, or vacant dwelling house of another designed for use as the dwelling of another.Universal Citation: GA Code § 16-7-1 (2014)
(a) As used in this Code section, the term:
(1) "Dwelling" means any building, structure, or portion thereof which is designed or intended for occupancy for residential use.
(2) "Railroad car" shall also include trailers on flatcars, containers on flatcars, trailers on railroad property, or containers on railroad property.
(b) A person commits the offense of burglary in the first degree when, without authority and with the intent to commit a felony or theft therein, he or she enters or remains within an occupied, unoccupied, or vacant dwelling house of another or any building, vehicle, railroad car, watercraft, aircraft, or other such structure designed for use as the dwelling of another. A person who commits the offense of burglary in the first degree shall be guilty of a felony and, upon conviction thereof, shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one nor more than 20 years. Upon the second conviction for burglary in the first degree, the defendant shall be guilty of a felony and shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than two nor more than 20 years. Upon the third and all subsequent convictions for burglary in the first degree, the defendant shall be guilty of a felony and shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than five nor more than 25 years.
© A person commits the offense of burglary in the second degree when, without authority and with the intent to commit a felony or theft therein, he or she enters or remains within an occupied, unoccupied, or vacant building, structure, vehicle, railroad car, watercraft, or aircraft. A person who commits the offense of burglary in the second degree shall be guilty of a felony and, upon conviction thereof, shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one nor more than five years. Upon the second and all subsequent convictions for burglary in the second degree, the defendant shall be guilty of a felony and shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one nor more than eight years.
(d) Upon a fourth and all subsequent convictions for a crime of burglary in any degree, adjudication of guilt or imposition of sentence shall not be suspended, probated, deferred, or withheld.O.C.G.A. 16-8-40 (2010)
16-8-40. Robbery
(a) A person commits the offense of robbery when, with intent to commit theft, he takes property of another from the person or the immediate presence of another:
(1) By use of force;
(2) By intimidation, by the use of threat or coercion, or by placing such person in fear of immediate serious bodily injury to himself or to another; or
(3) By sudden snatching.
(b) A person convicted of the offense of robbery shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one nor more than 20 years.
© Notwithstanding any other provision of this Code section, any person who commits the offense of robbery against a person who is 65 years of age or older shall, upon conviction thereof, be punished by imprisonment for not less than five nor more than 20 years. -
2020-05-17 at 5:12 PM UTC
Originally posted by Cathay Coof Oh, the one where he attacked two armed citizens who attempted to confront him?
no...it was a white gentleman and his young son out for an afternoon drive, practicing their second amendment rights, and some feral nigger ran up to them, attacked the gentlemans young son, whereupon the son was forced to defend himself by putting down a wild animal that ventured too close to civilization for the betterment of humanity. -
2020-05-17 at 5:12 PM UTC
Originally posted by Cathay Coof Oh, the one where he attacked two armed citizens who attempted to confront him?
Imagine two black guys approached a white guy with a gun.
Would the white guy be wrong to pull his gun first?
In both instances I think the people approaching with guns drawn are in the wrong. You do not approach strangers with your gun drawn. -
2020-05-17 at 5:14 PM UTC
Originally posted by Speedy Parker You just never give up no matter how many times you are wrong. Way to go tiger. SMH
Robbery and Burglary are two separate offenses.
As shown by two separate video sources there was more than enough for probable cause to permit a citizens arrest for burglary as he clearly and without authority and with the intent to commit a felony or theft therein, entered and remained within an unoccupied, or vacant dwelling house of another designed for use as the dwelling of another.
the easiest way for a layperson to remember the difference between robbery and burglary is a robbery requires a live person being involved...a burglary is against property with no people present.
the points really go up when its a residential dwelling...with people in it...and the term 'home invasion' gets worked into the equation. thats some long-term nigger-U time, right there. -
2020-05-17 at 5:15 PM UTC
Originally posted by MexicanMasterRace Imagine two black guys approached a white guy with a gun.
Would the white guy be wrong to pull his gun first?
In both instances I think the people approaching with guns drawn are in the wrong. You do not approach strangers with your gun drawn.
they were parked on the side of the road. the nigger approached and attacked the white gentleman and his young son -
2020-05-17 at 5:16 PM UTC
-
2020-05-17 at 5:17 PM UTC
Originally posted by MexicanMasterRace Imagine two black guys approached a white guy with a gun.
Would the white guy be wrong to pull his gun first?
In both instances I think the people approaching with guns drawn are in the wrong. You do not approach strangers with your gun drawn.
You have watched too much Westworld, tard. -
2020-05-17 at 5:25 PM UTC
Originally posted by -SpectraL Not quite. The one guy pointed a weapon at the unarmed guy, so the unarmed guy made a grab for it.
its on video. the nigger and young son were several feet apart. of 360 degrees of direction to run, the nigger intentionally maneuvered toward the drivers side of the truck, changed direction 90 degrees, and attacked the young son.
its on video. -
2020-05-17 at 5:25 PM UTCcant answer the question because you know it would out you as an illogical bigot? Cool.
-
2020-05-17 at 5:26 PM UTC
-
2020-05-17 at 6:13 PM UTCIf someone has a weapon pointed at you, you have all the right in the world to try and take it from them. Kinda stupid thing to do, when you have no weapon yourself, but it is an option on the table. Nothing wrong with it, except the odds factor.
-
2020-05-17 at 6:50 PM UTC
